93,588 research outputs found
Algorithm Portfolio for Individual-based Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithms
Surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms (SAEAs) are powerful optimisation
tools for computationally expensive problems (CEPs). However, a randomly
selected algorithm may fail in solving unknown problems due to no free lunch
theorems, and it will cause more computational resource if we re-run the
algorithm or try other algorithms to get a much solution, which is more serious
in CEPs. In this paper, we consider an algorithm portfolio for SAEAs to reduce
the risk of choosing an inappropriate algorithm for CEPs. We propose two
portfolio frameworks for very expensive problems in which the maximal number of
fitness evaluations is only 5 times of the problem's dimension. One framework
named Par-IBSAEA runs all algorithm candidates in parallel and a more
sophisticated framework named UCB-IBSAEA employs the Upper Confidence Bound
(UCB) policy from reinforcement learning to help select the most appropriate
algorithm at each iteration. An effective reward definition is proposed for the
UCB policy. We consider three state-of-the-art individual-based SAEAs on
different problems and compare them to the portfolios built from their
instances on several benchmark problems given limited computation budgets. Our
experimental studies demonstrate that our proposed portfolio frameworks
significantly outperform any single algorithm on the set of benchmark problems
An island based hybrid evolutionary algorithm for optimization
This is a post-print version of the article - Copyright @ 2008 Springer-VerlagEvolutionary computation has become an important problem solving methodology among the set of search and optimization techniques. Recently, more and more different evolutionary techniques have been developed, especially hybrid evolutionary algorithms. This paper proposes an island based hybrid evolutionary algorithm (IHEA) for optimization, which is based on Particle swarm optimization (PSO), Fast Evolutionary Programming (FEP), and Estimation of Distribution Algorithm (EDA). Within IHEA, an island model is designed to cooperatively search for the global optima in search space. By combining the strengths of the three component algorithms, IHEA greatly improves the optimization performance of the three basic algorithms. Experimental results demonstrate that IHEA outperforms all the three component algorithms on the test problems.This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of UK under Grant EP/E060722/1
Recommended from our members
Shuffled Complex-Self Adaptive Hybrid EvoLution (SC-SAHEL) optimization framework
Simplicity and flexibility of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms have attracted lots of attention in the field of optimization. Different optimization methods, however, hold algorithm-specific strengths and limitations, and selecting the best-performing algorithm for a specific problem is a tedious task. We introduce a new hybrid optimization framework, entitled Shuffled Complex-Self Adaptive Hybrid EvoLution (SC-SAHEL), which combines the strengths of different evolutionary algorithms (EAs) in a parallel computing scheme. SC-SAHEL explores performance of different EAs, such as the capability to escape local attractions, speed, convergence, etc., during population evolution as each individual EA suits differently to various response surfaces. The SC-SAHEL algorithm is benchmarked over 29 conceptual test functions, and a real-world hydropower reservoir model case study. Results show that the hybrid SC-SAHEL algorithm is rigorous and effective in finding global optimum for a majority of test cases, and that it is computationally efficient in comparison to algorithms with individual EA
The Sampling-and-Learning Framework: A Statistical View of Evolutionary Algorithms
Evolutionary algorithms (EAs), a large class of general purpose optimization
algorithms inspired from the natural phenomena, are widely used in various
industrial optimizations and often show excellent performance. This paper
presents an attempt towards revealing their general power from a statistical
view of EAs. By summarizing a large range of EAs into the sampling-and-learning
framework, we show that the framework directly admits a general analysis on the
probable-absolute-approximate (PAA) query complexity. We particularly focus on
the framework with the learning subroutine being restricted as a binary
classification, which results in the sampling-and-classification (SAC)
algorithms. With the help of the learning theory, we obtain a general upper
bound on the PAA query complexity of SAC algorithms. We further compare SAC
algorithms with the uniform search in different situations. Under the
error-target independence condition, we show that SAC algorithms can achieve
polynomial speedup to the uniform search, but not super-polynomial speedup.
Under the one-side-error condition, we show that super-polynomial speedup can
be achieved. This work only touches the surface of the framework. Its power
under other conditions is still open
SQG-Differential Evolution for difficult optimization problems under a tight function evaluation budget
In the context of industrial engineering, it is important to integrate
efficient computational optimization methods in the product development
process. Some of the most challenging simulation-based engineering design
optimization problems are characterized by: a large number of design variables,
the absence of analytical gradients, highly non-linear objectives and a limited
function evaluation budget. Although a huge variety of different optimization
algorithms is available, the development and selection of efficient algorithms
for problems with these industrial relevant characteristics, remains a
challenge. In this communication, a hybrid variant of Differential Evolution
(DE) is introduced which combines aspects of Stochastic Quasi-Gradient (SQG)
methods within the framework of DE, in order to improve optimization efficiency
on problems with the previously mentioned characteristics. The performance of
the resulting derivative-free algorithm is compared with other state-of-the-art
DE variants on 25 commonly used benchmark functions, under tight function
evaluation budget constraints of 1000 evaluations. The experimental results
indicate that the new algorithm performs excellent on the 'difficult' (high
dimensional, multi-modal, inseparable) test functions. The operations used in
the proposed mutation scheme, are computationally inexpensive, and can be
easily implemented in existing differential evolution variants or other
population-based optimization algorithms by a few lines of program code as an
non-invasive optional setting. Besides the applicability of the presented
algorithm by itself, the described concepts can serve as a useful and
interesting addition to the algorithmic operators in the frameworks of
heuristics and evolutionary optimization and computing
Analysis of Different Types of Regret in Continuous Noisy Optimization
The performance measure of an algorithm is a crucial part of its analysis.
The performance can be determined by the study on the convergence rate of the
algorithm in question. It is necessary to study some (hopefully convergent)
sequence that will measure how "good" is the approximated optimum compared to
the real optimum. The concept of Regret is widely used in the bandit literature
for assessing the performance of an algorithm. The same concept is also used in
the framework of optimization algorithms, sometimes under other names or
without a specific name. And the numerical evaluation of convergence rate of
noisy algorithms often involves approximations of regrets. We discuss here two
types of approximations of Simple Regret used in practice for the evaluation of
algorithms for noisy optimization. We use specific algorithms of different
nature and the noisy sphere function to show the following results. The
approximation of Simple Regret, termed here Approximate Simple Regret, used in
some optimization testbeds, fails to estimate the Simple Regret convergence
rate. We also discuss a recent new approximation of Simple Regret, that we term
Robust Simple Regret, and show its advantages and disadvantages.Comment: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016, Jul 2016,
Denver, United States. 201
- …