157 research outputs found

    Prostate cancer radiogenomics—from imaging to molecular characterization

    Get PDF
    Radiomics and genomics represent two of the most promising fields of cancer research, designed to improve the risk stratification and disease management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Radiomics involves a conversion of imaging derivate quantitative features using manual or automated algorithms, enhancing existing data through mathematical analysis. This could increase the clinical value in PCa management. To extract features from imaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the empiric nature of the analysis using machine learning and artificial intelligence could help make the best clinical decisions. Genomics information can be explained or decoded by radiomics. The development of methodologies can create more-efficient predictive models and can better characterize the molecular features of PCa. Additionally, the identification of new imaging biomarkers can overcome the known heterogeneity of PCa, by non-invasive radio-logical assessment of the whole specific organ. In the future, the validation of recent findings, in large, randomized cohorts of PCa patients, can establish the role of radiogenomics. Briefly, we aimed to review the current literature of highly quantitative and qualitative results from well-de-signed studies for the diagnoses, treatment, and follow-up of prostate cancer, based on radiomics, genomics and radiogenomics research

    Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review

    Get PDF
    : Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common worldwide diagnosed malignancy in male population. The diagnosis, the identification of aggressive disease, and the post-treatment follow-up needs a more comprehensive and holistic approach. Radiomics is the extraction and interpretation of images phenotypes in a quantitative manner. Radiomics may give an advantage through advancements in imaging modalities and through the potential power of artificial intelligence techniques by translating those features into clinical outcome prediction. This article gives an overview on the current evidence of methodology and reviews the available literature on radiomics in PCa patients, highlighting its potential for personalized treatment and future applications

    Radiomics and prostate MRI: Current role and future applications

    Get PDF
    Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is widely used as a triage test for men at a risk of prostate cancer. However, the traditional role of mpMRI was confined to prostate cancer staging. Radiomics is the quantitative extraction and analysis of minable data from medical images; it is emerging as a promising tool to detect and categorize prostate lesions. In this paper we review the role of radiomics applied to prostate mpMRI in detection and localization of prostate cancer, prediction of Gleason score and PI-RADS classification, prediction of extracapsular extension and of biochemical recurrence. We also provide a future perspective of artificial intelligence (machine learning and deep learning) applied to the field of prostate cancer

    Multi-parametric MR Imaging Biomarkers Associated to Clinical Outcomes in Gliomas: A Systematic Review

    Full text link
    [EN] Purpose: To systematically review evidence regarding the association of multi-parametric biomarkers with clinical outcomes and their capacity to explain relevant subcompartments of gliomas. Materials and Methods: Scopus database was searched for original journal papers from January 1st, 2007 to February 20th , 2017 according to PRISMA. Four hundred forty-nine abstracts of papers were reviewed and scored independently by two out of six authors. Based on those papers we analyzed associations between biomarkers, subcompartments within the tumor lesion, and clinical outcomes. From all the articles analyzed, the twenty-seven papers with the highest scores were highlighted to represent the evidence about MR imaging biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes. Similarly, eighteen studies defining subcompartments within the tumor region were also highlighted to represent the evidence of MR imaging biomarkers. Their reports were critically appraised according to the QUADAS-2 criteria. Results: It has been demonstrated that multi-parametric biomarkers are prepared for surrogating diagnosis, grading, segmentation, overall survival, progression-free survival, recurrence, molecular profiling and response to treatment in gliomas. Quantifications and radiomics features obtained from morphological exams (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1c), PWI (including DSC and DCE), diffusion (DWI, DTI) and chemical shift imaging (CSI) are the preferred MR biomarkers associated to clinical outcomes. Subcompartments relative to the peritumoral region, invasion, infiltration, proliferation, mass effect and pseudo flush, relapse compartments, gross tumor volumes, and high-risk regions have been defined to characterize the heterogeneity. For the majority of pairwise cooccurrences, we found no evidence to assert that observed co-occurrences were significantly different from their expected co-occurrences (Binomial test with False Discovery Rate correction, alpha=0.05). The co-occurrence among terms in the studied papers was found to be driven by their individual prevalence and trends in the literature. Conclusion: Combinations of MR imaging biomarkers from morphological, PWI, DWI and CSI exams have demonstrated their capability to predict clinical outcomes in different management moments of gliomas. Whereas morphologic-derived compartments have been mostly studied during the last ten years, new multi-parametric MRI approaches have also been proposed to discover specific subcompartments of the tumors. MR biomarkers from those subcompartments show the local behavior within the heterogeneous tumor and may quantify the prognosis and response to treatment of gliomas.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry for Investigation, Development and Innovation project with identification number DPI2016-80054-R.Oltra-Sastre, M.; Fuster García, E.; Juan -Albarracín, J.; Sáez Silvestre, C.; Perez-Girbes, A.; Sanz-Requena, R.; Revert-Ventura, A.... (2019). Multi-parametric MR Imaging Biomarkers Associated to Clinical Outcomes in Gliomas: A Systematic Review. Current Medical Imaging Reviews. 15(10):933-947. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405615666190109100503S9339471510Louis D.N.; Perry A.; Reifenberger G.; The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016,131(6),803-820Ostrom Q.T.; Gittleman H.; Fulop J.; CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro-oncol 2015,17(Suppl. 4),iv1-iv62Yachida S.; Jones S.; Bozic I.; Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature 2010,467(7319),1114-1117Gerlinger M.; Rowan A.J.; Horswell S.; Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012,366(10),883-892Sottoriva A.; Spiteri I.; Piccirillo S.G.M.; Intratumor heterogeneityin human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013,110(10),4009-4014Whiting P.F.; Rutjes A.W.; Westwood M.E.; QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011,155(8),529-536Stupp R.; Mason W.P.; van den Bent M.J.; Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005,352(10),987-996Ponte K.F.; Berro D.H.; Collet S.; In vivo relationship between hypoxia and angiogenesis in human glioblastoma: a multimodal imaging study. J Nucl Med 2017,58(10),1574-1579Pope W.B.; Kim H.J.; Huo J.; Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: ADC histogram analysis predicts response to bevacizumab treatment. Radiology 2009,252(1),182-189Mörén L.; Bergenheim A.T.; Ghasimi S.; Brännström T.; Johansson M.; Antti H.; Metabolomic screening of tumor tissue and serum in glioma patients reveals diagnostic and prognostic information. Metabolites 2015,5(3),502-520Prager A.J.; Martinez N.; Beal K.; Omuro A.; Zhang Z.; Young R.J.; Diffusion and perfusion MRI to differentiate treatment-related changes including pseudoprogression from recurrent tumors in high-grade gliomas with histopathologic evidence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015,36(5),877-885Kickingereder P.; Burth S.; Wick A.; Radiomic profiling of glioblastoma: identifying an imaging predictor of patient survival with improved performance over established clinical and radiologic risk models. Radiology 2016,280(3),880-889Yoo R-E.; Choi S.H.; Cho H.R.; Tumor blood flow from arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI: a key parameter in distinguishing high-grade gliomas from primary cerebral lymphomas, and in predicting genetic biomarkers in high-grade gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013,38(4),852-860Liberman G.; Louzoun Y.; Aizenstein O.; Automatic multi-modal MR tissue classification for the assessment of response to bevacizumab in patients with glioblastoma. Eur J Radiol 2013,82(2),e87-e94Ramadan S.; Andronesi O.C.; Stanwell P.; Lin A.P.; Sorensen A.G.; Mountford C.E.; Use of in vivo two-dimensional MR spectroscopy to compare the biochemistry of the human brain to that of glioblastoma. Radiology 2011,259(2),540-549Xintao H.; Wong K.K.; Young G.S.; Guo L.; Wong S.T.; Support vector machine multi-parametric MRI identification of pseudoprogression from tumor recurrence in patients with resected glioblastoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011,33(2),296Ingrisch M.; Schneider M.J.; Nörenberg D.; Radiomic Analysis reveals prognostic information in T1-weighted baseline magnetic resonance imaging in patients with glioblastoma. Invest Radiol 2017,52(6),360-366Ulyte A.; Katsaros V.K.; Liouta E.; Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters for high-grade glioma patients. Neuroradiology 2016,58(12),1197-1208O’Neill A.F.; Qin L.; Wen P.Y.; de Groot J.F.; Van den Abbeele A.D.; Yap J.T.; Demonstration of DCE-MRI as an early pharmacodynamic biomarker of response to VEGF Trap in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2016,130(3),495-503Kickingereder P.; Bonekamp D.; Nowosielski M.; Radiogenomics of glioblastoma: machine learning-based classification of molecular characteristics by using multiparametric and multiregional mr imaging features. Radiology 2016,281(3),907-918Roberto S-R.; Antonio R-V.; Luis M-B.; Angel A-B.; Gracián G-M.; Quantitative mr perfusion parameters related to survival time in high-grade gliomas. European Radiology 2013,23(12),3456-3465Jain R.; Poisson L.; Narang J.; Genomic mapping and survival prediction in glioblastoma: molecular subclassification strengthened by hemodynamic imaging biomarkers. Radiology 2013,267(1),212-220Fathi K.A.; Mohseni M.; Rezaei S.; Bakhshandehpour G.; Saligheh R.H.; Multi-parametric (ADC/PWI/T2-W) image fusion approach for accurate semi-automatic segmentation of tumorous regions in glioblastoma multiforme. MAGMA 2015,28(1),13-22Caulo M.; Panara V.; Tortora D.; Data-driven grading of brain gliomas: a multiparametric MR imaging study. Radiology 2014,272(2),494-503Alexiou G.A.; Zikou A.; Tsiouris S.; Comparison of diffusion tensor, dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI and (99m)Tc-Tetrofosmin brain SPECT for the detection of recurrent high-grade glioma. Magn Reson Imaging 2014,32(7),854-859Van Cauter S.; De Keyzer F.; Sima D.M.; Integrating diffusion kurtosis imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI, and short echo time chemical shift imaging for grading gliomas. Neuro-oncol 2014,16(7),1010-1021Seeger A.; Braun C.; Skardelly M.; Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease. Acad Radiol 2013,20(12),1557-1565Chawalparit O.; Sangruchi T.; Witthiwej T.; Diagnostic performance of advanced mri in differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas in a setting of routine service. J Med Assoc Thai 2013,96(10),1365-1373Li Y.; Lupo J.M.; Parvataneni R.; Survival analysis in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma using pre- and postradiotherapy MR spectroscopic imaging. Neuro-oncol 2013,15(5),607-617Shankar J.J.S.; Woulfe J.; Silva V.D.; Nguyen T.B.; Evaluation of perfusion CT in grading and prognostication of high-grade gliomas at diagnosis: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013,200(5)Zinn P.O.; Mahajan B.; Sathyan P.; Radiogenomic mapping of edema/cellular invasion MRI-phenotypes in glioblastoma multiforme. PLoS One 2011,6(10)Matsusue E.; Fink J.R.; Rockhill J.K.; Ogawa T.; Maravilla K.R.; Distinction between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR imaging. Neuroradiology 2010,52(4),297-306Juan-Albarracín J.; Fuster-Garcia E.; Manjón J.V.; Automated glioblastoma segmentation based on a multiparametric structured unsupervised classification. PLoS One 2015,10(5)Itakura H.; Achrol A.S.; Mitchell L.A.; Magnetic resonance image features identify glioblastoma phenotypic subtypes with distinct molecular pathway activities. Sci Transl Med 2015,7(303)Ion-Margineanu A.; Van Cauter S.; Sima D.M.; Tumour relapse prediction using multiparametric MR data recorded during follow-up of GBM patients. BioMed Res Int 2015,2015Durst C.R.; Raghavan P.; Shaffrey M.E.; Multimodal MR imaging model to predict tumor infiltration in patients with gliomas. Neuroradiology 2014,56(2),107-115Yoon J.H.; Kim J.H.; Kang W.J.; Grading of cerebral glioma with multi-parametric MR Imaging and 18F-FDG-PET: concordance and accuracy. European Radiol 2014,24(2),380-389Demerath T.; Simon-Gabriel C.P.; Kellner E.; Mesoscopic imaging of glioblastomas: are diffusion, perfusion and spectroscopic measures influenced by the radiogenetic phenotype? Neuroradiol J 2017,30(1),36-47Qin L.; Li X.; Stroiney A.; Advanced MRI assessment to predict benefit of anti-programmed cell death 1 protein immunotherapy response in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuroradiology 2017,59(2),135-145Boult J.K.R.; Borri M.; Jury A.; Investigating intracranial tumour growth patterns with multiparametric MRI incorporating Gd-DTPA and USPIO-enhanced imaging. NMR Biomed 2016,29(11),1608-1617Server A.; Kulle B.; Gadmar Ø.B.; Josefsen R.; Kumar T.; Nakstad P.H.; Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas. Eur J Radiol 2011,80(2),462-470Chang P.D.; Chow D.S.; Yang P.H.; Filippi C.G.; Lignelli A.; Predicting glioblastoma recurrence by early changes in the apparent diffusion coefficient value and signal intensity on FLAIR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017,208(1),57-65Yi C.; Shangjie R.; Volume of high-risk intratumoralsubregions at multi-parametric MR imaging predicts overall survival and complements molecular analysis of glioblastoma. Eur Radiol 2017,27,3583-3592Khalifa J.; Tensaouti F.; Chaltiel L.; Identification of a candidate biomarker from perfusion MRI to anticipate glioblastoma progression after chemoradiation. Eur Radiol 2016,26(11),4194-4203Prateek P.; Jay P.; Partovi S.; Madabhushi A.; Tiwari P.; Radiomic features from the peritumoral brain parenchyma on treatment-naïve multi-parametric MR imaging predict long versus short-term survival in glioblastomamultiforme: preliminary findings. Eur Radiol 2017,27(10),4188-4197Lemasson B.; Chenevert T.L.; Lawrence T.S.; Impact of perfusion map analysis on early survival prediction accuracy in glioma patients. Transl Oncol 2013,6(6),766-774Inano R.; Oishi N.; Kunieda T.; Visualization of heterogeneity and regional grading of gliomas by multiple features using magnetic resonance-based clustered images. Sci Rep 2016,6,30344Delgado-Goñi T.; Ortega-Martorell S.; Ciezka M.; MRSI-based molecular imaging of therapy response to temozolomide in preclinical glioblastoma using source analysis. NMR Biomed 2016,29(6),732-743Cui Y.; Tha K.K.; Terasaka S.; Prognostic imaging biomarkers in glioblastoma: development and independent validation on the basis of multiregion and quantitative analysis of MR images. Radiology 2016,278(2),546-553Price S.J.; Young A.M.H.; Scotton W.J.; Multimodal MRI can identify perfusion and metabolic changes in the invasive margin of glioblastomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016,43(2),487-494Sauwen N.; Acou M.; Van Cauter S.; Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI. Neuroimage Clin 2016,12,753-764Jena A.; Taneja S.; Gambhir A.; Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis: single-session multiparametric approach using simultaneous O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET/MRI. Clin Nucl Med 2016,41(5),e228-e236Kim H.S.; Goh M.J.; Kim N.; Choi C.G.; Kim S.J.; Kim J.H.; Which combination of MR imaging modalities is best for predicting recurrent glioblastoma? Study of diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility. Radiology 2014,273(3),831-843Christoforidis G.A.; Yang M.; Abduljalil A.; “Tumoral pseudoblush” identified within gliomas at high-spatial-resolution ultrahigh-field-strength gradient-echo MR imaging corresponds to microvascularity at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 2012,264(1),210-217Wang S.; Kim S.; Chawla S.; Differentiation between glioblastomas, solitary brain metastases, and primary cerebral lymphomas using diffusion tensor and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011,32(3),507-514Hanahan D.; Weinberg R.A.; Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011,144(5),646-674Macdonald D.R.; Cascino T.L.; Schold S.C.; Cairncross J.G.; Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 1990,8(7),1277-1280Wen P.Y.; Macdonald D.R.; Reardon D.A.; Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 2010,28(11),1963-1972Sorensen A.G.; Batchelor T.T.; Wen P.Y.; Zhang W-T.; Jain R.K.; Response criteria for glioma. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2008,5(11),634-644Rosenkrantz A.B.; Friedman K.; Chandarana H.; Current status of hybrid PET/MRI in oncologic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016,206(1),162-172Castiglioni I.; Gallivanone F.; Canevari C.; Hybrid PET/MRI for In vivo imaging of cancer: current clinical experiences and recent advances. Curr Med Imaging 2016,12,106Mainta I.C.; Perani D.; Delattre B.M.A.; FDG PET/MR imaging in major neurocognitive disorders. Curr Alzheimer Res 2017,14,186-197Marner L.; Henriksen O.M.; Lundemann M.; Larsen V.A.; Law I.; Clinical PET/MRI in neurooncology: opportunities and challenges from a single-institution perspective. Clin Transl Imaging 2017,5(2),135-149R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2015. Available from: https://www.R-project.org

    Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications

    Get PDF
    Judgement, as one of the core tenets of medicine, relies upon the integration of multilayered data with nuanced decision making. Cancer offers a unique context for medical decisions given not only its variegated forms with evolution of disease but also the need to take into account the individual condition of patients, their ability to receive treatment, and their responses to treatment. Challenges remain in the accurate detection, characterization, and monitoring of cancers despite improved technologies. Radiographic assessment of disease most commonly relies upon visual evaluations, the interpretations of which may be augmented by advanced computational analyses. In particular, artificial intelligence (AI) promises to make great strides in the qualitative interpretation of cancer imaging by expert clinicians, including volumetric delineation of tumors over time, extrapolation of the tumor genotype and biological course from its radiographic phenotype, prediction of clinical outcome, and assessment of the impact of disease and treatment on adjacent organs. AI may automate processes in the initial interpretation of images and shift the clinical workflow of radiographic detection, management decisions on whether or not to administer an intervention, and subsequent observation to a yet to be envisioned paradigm. Here, the authors review the current state of AI as applied to medical imaging of cancer and describe advances in 4 tumor types (lung, brain, breast, and prostate) to illustrate how common clinical problems are being addressed. Although most studies evaluating AI applications in oncology to date have not been vigorously validated for reproducibility and generalizability, the results do highlight increasingly concerted efforts in pushing AI technology to clinical use and to impact future directions in cancer care

    Quantitative analysis with machine learning models for multi-parametric brain imaging data

    Get PDF
    Gliomas are considered to be the most common primary adult malignant brain tumor. With the dramatic increases in computational power and improvements in image analysis algorithms, computer-aided medical image analysis has been introduced into clinical applications. Precision tumor grading and genotyping play an indispensable role in clinical diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Gliomas diagnostic procedures include histopathological imaging tests, molecular imaging scans and tumor grading. Pathologic review of tumor morphology in histologic sections is the traditional method for cancer classification and grading, yet human study has limitations that can result in low reproducibility and inter-observer agreement. Compared with histopathological images, Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging present the different structure and functional features, which might serve as noninvasive surrogates for tumor genotypes. Therefore, computer-aided image analysis has been adopted in clinical application, which might partially overcome these shortcomings due to its capacity to quantitatively and reproducibly measure multilevel features on multi-parametric medical information. Imaging features obtained from a single modal image do not fully represent the disease, so quantitative imaging features, including morphological, structural, cellular and molecular level features, derived from multi-modality medical images should be integrated into computer-aided medical image analysis. The image quality differentiation between multi-modality images is a challenge in the field of computer-aided medical image analysis. In this thesis, we aim to integrate the quantitative imaging data obtained from multiple modalities into mathematical models of tumor prediction response to achieve additional insights into practical predictive value. Our major contributions in this thesis are: 1. Firstly, to resolve the imaging quality difference and observer-dependent in histological image diagnosis, we proposed an automated machine-learning brain tumor-grading platform to investigate contributions of multi-parameters from multimodal data including imaging parameters or features from Whole Slide Images (WSI) and the proliferation marker KI-67. For each WSI, we extract both visual parameters such as morphology parameters and sub-visual parameters including first-order and second-order features. A quantitative interpretable machine learning approach (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) was followed to measure the contribution of features for single case. Most grading systems based on machine learning models are considered “black boxes,” whereas with this system the clinically trusted reasoning could be revealed. The quantitative analysis and explanation may assist clinicians to better understand the disease and accordingly to choose optimal treatments for improving clinical outcomes. 2. Based on the automated brain tumor-grading platform we propose, multimodal Magnetic Resonance Images (MRIs) have been introduced in our research. A new imaging–tissue correlation based approach called RA-PA-Thomics was proposed to predict the IDH genotype. Inspired by the concept of image fusion, we integrate multimodal MRIs and the scans of histopathological images for indirect, fast, and cost saving IDH genotyping. The proposed model has been verified by multiple evaluation criteria for the integrated data set and compared to the results in the prior art. The experimental data set includes public data sets and image information from two hospitals. Experimental results indicate that the model provided improves the accuracy of glioma grading and genotyping

    A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging

    Get PDF
    A multitude of studies have explored the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in providing diagnostic support to radiologists, pathologists, and urologists in prostate cancer detection, risk-stratification, and management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of relevant literature regarding the use of AI models in (1) detecting prostate cancer on radiology images (magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging), (2) detecting prostate cancer on histopathology images of prostate biopsy tissue, and (3) assisting in supporting tasks for prostate cancer detection (prostate gland segmentation, MRI-histopathology registration, MRI-ultrasound registration). We discuss both the potential of these AI models to assist in the clinical workflow of prostate cancer diagnosis, as well as the current limitations including variability in training data sets, algorithms, and evaluation criteria. We also discuss ongoing challenges and what is needed to bridge the gap between academic research on AI for prostate cancer and commercial solutions that improve routine clinical care

    State of the Art in Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Get PDF
    The most common liver malignancy is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is also associated with high mortality. Often HCC develops in a chronic liver disease setting, and early diagnosis as well as accurate screening of high-risk patients is crucial for appropriate and effective management of these patients. While imaging characteristics of HCC are well-defined in the diagnostic phase, challenging cases still occur, and current prognostic and predictive models are limited in their accuracy. Radiomics and machine learning (ML) offer new tools to address these issues and may lead to scientific breakthroughs with the potential to impact clinical practice and improve patient outcomes. In this review, we will present an overview of these technologies in the setting of HCC imaging across different modalities and a range of applications. These include lesion segmentation, diagnosis, prognostic modeling and prediction of treatment response. Finally, limitations preventing clinical application of radiomics and ML at the present time are discussed, together with necessary future developments to bring the field forward and outside of a purely academic endeavor
    corecore