National Center for Genome Analysis Program Year 3 Report – September 15, 2013 – September 14, 2014

On September 15, 2011, Indiana University (IU) received three years of support to establish the National Center for Genome Analysis Support (NCGAS). This technical report describes the activities of the third 12 months of NCGASThe facilities supported by the Research Technologies division at Indiana University are supported by a number of grants. The authors would like to acknowledge that although the National Center for Genome Analysis Support is funded by NSF 1062432, our work would not be possible without the generous support of the following awards received by our parent organization, the Pervasive Technology Institute at Indiana University. • The Indiana University Pervasive Technology Institute was supported in part by two grants from the Lilly Endowment, Inc. • NCGAS has also been supported directly by the Indiana METACyt Initiative. The Indiana METACyt Initiative of Indiana University is supported in part by the Lilly Endowment, Inc. • This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CNS-0521433. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF)

ML-MEDIC: A Preliminary Study of an Interactive Visual Analysis Tool Facilitating Clinical Applications of Machine Learning for Precision Medicine

Accessible interactive tools that integrate machine learning methods with clinical research and reduce the programming experience required are needed to move science forward. Here, we present Machine Learning for Medical Exploration and Data-Inspired Care (ML-MEDIC), a point-and-click, interactive tool with a visual interface for facilitating machine learning and statistical analyses in clinical research. We deployed ML-MEDIC in the American Heart Association (AHA) Precision Medicine Platform to provide secure internet access and facilitate collaboration. ML-MEDIC’s efficacy for facilitating the adoption of machine learning was evaluated through two case studies in collaboration with clinical domain experts. A domain expert review was also conducted to obtain an impression of the usability and potential limitations

Tools and data services registry: a community effort to document bioinformatics resources

Life sciences are yielding huge data sets that underpin scientific discoveries fundamental to improvement in human health, agriculture and the environment. In support of these discoveries, a plethora of databases and tools are deployed, in technically complex and diverse implementations, across a spectrum of scientific disciplines. The corpus of documentation of these resources is fragmented across the Web, with much redundancy, and has lacked a common standard of information. The outcome is that scientists must often struggle to find, understand, compare and use the best resources for the task at hand. Here we present a community-driven curation effort, supported by ELIXIR—the European infrastructure for biological information—that aspires to a comprehensive and consistent registry of information about bioinformatics resources. The sustainable upkeep of this Tools and Data Services Registry is assured by a curation effort driven by and tailored to local needs, and shared amongst a network of engaged partners. As of November 2015, the registry includes 1785 resources, with depositions from 126 individual registrations including 52 institutional providers and 74 individuals. With community support, the registry can become a standard for dissemination of information about bioinformatics resources: we welcome everyone to join us in this common endeavour. The registry is freely available at https://bio.tools

Tools and data services registry: a community effort to document bioinformatics resources.

Life sciences are yielding huge data sets that underpin scientific discoveries fundamental to improvement in human health, agriculture and the environment. In support of these discoveries, a plethora of databases and tools are deployed, in technically complex and diverse implementations, across a spectrum of scientific disciplines. The corpus of documentation of these resources is fragmented across the Web, with much redundancy, and has lacked a common standard of information. The outcome is that scientists must often struggle to find, understand, compare and use the best resources for the task at hand.Here we present a community-driven curation effort, supported by ELIXIR-the European infrastructure for biological information-that aspires to a comprehensive and consistent registry of information about bioinformatics resources. The sustainable upkeep of this Tools and Data Services Registry is assured by a curation effort driven by and tailored to local needs, and shared amongst a network of engaged partners.As of November 2015, the registry includes 1785 resources, with depositions from 126 individual registrations including 52 institutional providers and 74 individuals. With community support, the registry can become a standard for dissemination of information about bioinformatics resources: we welcome everyone to join us in this common endeavour. The registry is freely available at https://bio.tools

Tools and data services registry: a community effort to document bioinformatics resources

Life sciences are yielding huge data sets that underpin scientific discoveries fundamental to improvement in human health, agriculture and the environment. In support of these discoveries, a plethora of databases and tools are deployed, in technically complex and diverse implementations, across a spectrum of scientific disciplines. The corpus of documentation of these resources is fragmented across the Web, with much redundancy, and has lacked a common standard of information. The outcome is that scientists must often struggle to find, understand, compare and use the best resources for the task at hand. Here we present a community-driven curation effort, supported by ELIXIR––the European infrastructure for biological information––that aspires to a comprehensive and consistent registry of information about bioinformatics resources. The sustainable upkeep of this Tools and Data Services Registry is assured by a curation effort driven by and tailored to local needs, and shared amongst a network of engaged partners. As of November 2015, the registry includes 1785 resources, with depositions from 126 individual registrations including 52 institutional providers and 74 individuals. With community support, the registry can become a standard for dissemination of information about bioinformatics resources: we welcome everyone to join us in this common endeavour. The registry is freely available at https://bio.tools.publishedVersio

African researchers' perceptions and expectations of the benefits of genomics research in Africa : a qualitative study

Introduction: Genomics research raises a number of ethical, legal and social issues (ELSI), one of which is the concept of benefit sharing. While benefits and benefit sharing are difficult to discuss because of questions on what needs to be shared, with whom and by whom, it cannot be pushed to the side-lines especially as it is a way of promoting justice in health research and of ensuring that research is of social value to study communities. In this study, we explored the perceptions and expectations of African genomics scientists on the benefits of genomics research to Africa. Method: This was a qualitative study and we adopted a grounded theory approach. I conducted 17 in-depth interviews with genomics researchers in Africa to explore their perceptions of benefits and benefit sharing in genomics research in Africa. Transcripts of interviews were imported into QSR-NVivo 10 for thematic analysis. A thematic analysis of informed consent documents used in 13 genomics studies in Africa was also done to explore how research benefits are documented. Results: Research collaboration, research capacity building and access to genomics medicine were perceived to be the main benefits of African genomics science (AGS). In terms of research collaboration, there were perceived fears of exploitation of African researchers and research participants, and the non-sustainability of AGS. To address the problem of exploitation, African researchers expressed the need for fairness in AGS through transparency and equity in research collaborations, enhancing research oversight, African ownership and leadership of AGS, community engagement and research capacity building. In terms of genomics medicine, African genomics researchers perceived that AGS would have an impact on healthcare in Africa in the area of diagnosis, pharmacogenomics and public health. However, there were concerns around access to genomics medicine by African populations, lack of capacity for genomics medicine in Africa and the need for AGS to focus on Africa's healthcare priorities. There was however limited awareness of the concept of benefit sharing among African genomics researchers though they perceived it is as an important concept for AGS. Interviewees suggested that benefit sharing could be in the form of research capacity building, feedback of study findings, science education, community projects and the sharing of profits