4,888 research outputs found

    Global semantic typing for inductive and coinductive computing

    Get PDF
    Inductive and coinductive types are commonly construed as ontological (Church-style) types, denoting canonical data-sets such as natural numbers, lists, and streams. For various purposes, notably the study of programs in the context of global semantics, it is preferable to think of types as semantical properties (Curry-style). Intrinsic theories were introduced in the late 1990s to provide a purely logical framework for reasoning about programs and their semantic types. We extend them here to data given by any combination of inductive and coinductive definitions. This approach is of interest because it fits tightly with syntactic, semantic, and proof theoretic fundamentals of formal logic, with potential applications in implicit computational complexity as well as extraction of programs from proofs. We prove a Canonicity Theorem, showing that the global definition of program typing, via the usual (Tarskian) semantics of first-order logic, agrees with their operational semantics in the intended model. Finally, we show that every intrinsic theory is interpretable in a conservative extension of first-order arithmetic. This means that quantification over infinite data objects does not lead, on its own, to proof-theoretic strength beyond that of Peano Arithmetic. Intrinsic theories are perfectly amenable to formulas-as-types Curry-Howard morphisms, and were used to characterize major computational complexity classes Their extensions described here have similar potential which has already been applied

    A uniform approach to fundamental sequences and hierarchies

    Get PDF
    In this article we give a unifying approach to the theory of fundamental sequences and their related Hardy hierarchies of number-theoretic functions and we show the equivalence of the new approach with the classical one

    Infinite terms and recursion in higher types

    Get PDF

    On axiom schemes for T-provably Δ1 formulas

    Get PDF
    This paper investigates the status of the fragments of Peano Arithmetic obtained by restricting induction, collection and least number axiom schemes to formulas which are Δ1 provably in an arithmetic theory T. In particular, we determine the provably total computable functions of this kind of theories. As an application, we obtain a reduction of the problem whether IΔ0+¬exp implies BΣ1 to a purely recursion-theoretic question.Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación MTM2008–0643

    Hilbert's Program Then and Now

    Get PDF
    Hilbert's program was an ambitious and wide-ranging project in the philosophy and foundations of mathematics. In order to "dispose of the foundational questions in mathematics once and for all, "Hilbert proposed a two-pronged approach in 1921: first, classical mathematics should be formalized in axiomatic systems; second, using only restricted, "finitary" means, one should give proofs of the consistency of these axiomatic systems. Although Godel's incompleteness theorems show that the program as originally conceived cannot be carried out, it had many partial successes, and generated important advances in logical theory and meta-theory, both at the time and since. The article discusses the historical background and development of Hilbert's program, its philosophical underpinnings and consequences, and its subsequent development and influences since the 1930s.Comment: 43 page

    Short Proofs for Slow Consistency

    Full text link
    Let Con(T) ⁣ ⁣x\operatorname{Con}(\mathbf T)\!\restriction\!x denote the finite consistency statement "there are no proofs of contradiction in T\mathbf T with x\leq x symbols". For a large class of natural theories T\mathbf T, Pudl\'ak has shown that the lengths of the shortest proofs of Con(T) ⁣ ⁣n\operatorname{Con}(\mathbf T)\!\restriction\!n in the theory T\mathbf T itself are bounded by a polynomial in nn. At the same time he conjectures that T\mathbf T does not have polynomial proofs of the finite consistency statements Con(T+Con(T)) ⁣ ⁣n\operatorname{Con}(\mathbf T+\operatorname{Con}(\mathbf T))\!\restriction\!n. In contrast we show that Peano arithmetic (PA\mathbf{PA}) has polynomial proofs of Con(PA+Con(PA)) ⁣ ⁣n\operatorname{Con}(\mathbf{PA}+\operatorname{Con}^*(\mathbf{PA}))\!\restriction\!n, where Con(PA)\operatorname{Con}^*(\mathbf{PA}) is the slow consistency statement for Peano arithmetic, introduced by S.-D. Friedman, Rathjen and Weiermann. We also obtain a new proof of the result that the usual consistency statement Con(PA)\operatorname{Con}(\mathbf{PA}) is equivalent to ε0\varepsilon_0 iterations of slow consistency. Our argument is proof-theoretic, while previous investigations of slow consistency relied on non-standard models of arithmetic

    A Categorical Construction of Bachmann-Howard Fixed Points

    Full text link
    Peter Aczel has given a categorical construction for fixed points of normal functors, i.e. dilators which preserve initial segments. For a general dilator XTXX\mapsto T_X we cannot expect to obtain a well-founded fixed point, as the order type of TXT_X may always exceed the order type of XX. In the present paper we show how to construct a Bachmann-Howard fixed point of TT, i.e. an order BH(T)\operatorname{BH}(T) with an "almost" order preserving collapse ϑ:TBH(T)BH(T)\vartheta:T_{\operatorname{BH}(T)}\rightarrow\operatorname{BH}(T). Building on previous work, we show that Π11\Pi^1_1-comprehension is equivalent to the assertion that BH(T)\operatorname{BH}(T) is well-founded for any dilator TT.Comment: This version has been accepted for publication in the Bulletin of the London Mathematical Societ

    Computability and analysis: the legacy of Alan Turing

    Full text link
    We discuss the legacy of Alan Turing and his impact on computability and analysis.Comment: 49 page
    corecore