Cross-lingual Semantic Parsing with Categorial Grammars

Humans communicate using natural language. We need to make sure that computers can understand us so that they can act on our spoken commands or independently gain new insights from knowledge that is written down as text. A “semantic parser” is a program that translates natural-language sentences into computer commands or logical formulas–something a computer can work with. Despite much recent progress on semantic parsing, most research focuses on English, and semantic parsers for other languages cannot keep up with the developments. My thesis aims to help close this gap. It investigates “cross-lingual learning” methods by which a computer can automatically adapt a semantic parser to another language, such as Dutch. The computer learns by looking at example sentences and their translations, e.g., “She likes to read books”/”Ze leest graag boeken”. Even with many such examples, learning which word means what and how word meanings combine into sentence meanings is a challenge, because translations are rarely word-for-word. They exhibit grammatical differences and non-literalities. My thesis presents a method for tackling these challenges based on the grammar formalism Combinatory Categorial Grammar. It shows that this is a suitable formalism for this purpose, that many structural differences between sentences and their translations can be dealt with in this framework, and that a (rudimentary) semantic parser for Dutch can be learned cross-lingually based on one for English. I also investigate methods for building large corpora of texts annotated with logical formulas to further study and improve semantic parsers

Research in the Language, Information and Computation Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania

This report takes its name from the Computational Linguistics Feedback Forum (CLiFF), an informal discussion group for students and faculty. However the scope of the research covered in this report is broader than the title might suggest; this is the yearly report of the LINC Lab, the Language, Information and Computation Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania. It may at first be hard to see the threads that bind together the work presented here, work by faculty, graduate students and postdocs in the Computer Science and Linguistics Departments, and the Institute for Research in Cognitive Science. It includes prototypical Natural Language fields such as: Combinatorial Categorial Grammars, Tree Adjoining Grammars, syntactic parsing and the syntax-semantics interface; but it extends to statistical methods, plan inference, instruction understanding, intonation, causal reasoning, free word order languages, geometric reasoning, medical informatics, connectionism, and language acquisition. Naturally, this introduction cannot spell out all the connections between these abstracts; we invite you to explore them on your own. In fact, with this issue it’s easier than ever to do so: this document is accessible on the “information superhighway”. Just call up http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~cliff-group/94/cliffnotes.html In addition, you can find many of the papers referenced in the CLiFF Notes on the net. Most can be obtained by following links from the authors’ abstracts in the web version of this report. The abstracts describe the researchers’ many areas of investigation, explain their shared concerns, and present some interesting work in Cognitive Science. We hope its new online format makes the CLiFF Notes a more useful and interesting guide to Computational Linguistics activity at Penn

CLiFF Notes: Research in the Language Information and Computation Laboratory of The University of Pennsylvania

This report takes its name from the Computational Linguistics Feedback Forum (CLIFF), an informal discussion group for students and faculty. However the scope of the research covered in this report is broader than the title might suggest; this is the yearly report of the LINC Lab, the Language, Information and Computation Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania. It may at first be hard to see the threads that bind together the work presented here, work by faculty, graduate students and postdocs in the Computer Science, Psychology, and Linguistics Departments, and the Institute for Research in Cognitive Science. It includes prototypical Natural Language fields such as: Combinatorial Categorial Grammars, Tree Adjoining Grammars, syntactic parsing and the syntax-semantics interface; but it extends to statistical methods, plan inference, instruction understanding, intonation, causal reasoning, free word order languages, geometric reasoning, medical informatics, connectionism, and language acquisition. With 48 individual contributors and six projects represented, this is the largest LINC Lab collection to date, and the most diverse

CLiFF Notes: Research in the Language, Information and Computation Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania

One concern of the Computer Graphics Research Lab is in simulating human task behavior and understanding why the visualization of the appearance, capabilities and performance of humans is so challenging. Our research has produced a system, called Jack, for the definition, manipulation, animation and human factors analysis of simulated human figures. Jack permits the envisionment of human motion by interactive specification and simultaneous execution of multiple constraints, and is sensitive to such issues as body shape and size, linkage, and plausible motions. Enhanced control is provided by natural behaviors such as looking, reaching, balancing, lifting, stepping, walking, grasping, and so on. Although intended for highly interactive applications, Jack is a foundation for other research. The very ubiquitousness of other people in our lives poses a tantalizing challenge to the computational modeler: people are at once the most common object around us, and yet the most structurally complex. Their everyday movements are amazingly fluid, yet demanding to reproduce, with actions driven not just mechanically by muscles and bones but also cognitively by beliefs and intentions. Our motor systems manage to learn how to make us move without leaving us the burden or pleasure of knowing how we did it. Likewise we learn how to describe the actions and behaviors of others without consciously struggling with the processes of perception, recognition, and language. Present technology lets us approach human appearance and motion through computer graphics modeling and three dimensional animation, but there is considerable distance to go before purely synthesized figures trick our senses. We seek to build computational models of human like figures which manifest animacy and convincing behavior. Towards this end, we: Create an interactive computer graphics human model; Endow it with reasonable biomechanical properties; Provide it with human like behaviors; Use this simulated figure as an agent to effect changes in its world; Describe and guide its tasks through natural language instructions. There are presently no perfect solutions to any of these problems; ultimately, however, we should be able to give our surrogate human directions that, in conjunction with suitable symbolic reasoning processes, make it appear to behave in a natural, appropriate, and intelligent fashion. Compromises will be essential, due to limits in computation, throughput of display hardware, and demands of real-time interaction, but our algorithms aim to balance the physical device constraints with carefully crafted models, general solutions, and thoughtful organization. The Jack software is built on Silicon Graphics Iris 4D workstations because those systems have 3-D graphics features that greatly aid the process of interacting with highly articulated figures such as the human body. Of course, graphics capabilities themselves do not make a usable system. Our research has therefore focused on software to make the manipulation of a simulated human figure easy for a rather specific user population: human factors design engineers or ergonomics analysts involved in visualizing and assessing human motor performance, fit, reach, view, and other physical tasks in a workplace environment. The software also happens to be quite usable by others, including graduate students and animators. The point, however, is that program design has tried to take into account a wide variety of physical problem oriented tasks, rather than just offer a computer graphics and animation tool for the already computer sophisticated or skilled animator. As an alternative to interactive specification, a simulation system allows a convenient temporal and spatial parallel programming language for behaviors. The Graphics Lab is working with the Natural Language Group to explore the possibility of using natural language instructions, such as those found in assembly or maintenance manuals, to drive the behavior of our animated human agents. (See the CLiFF note entry for the AnimNL group for details.) Even though Jack is under continual development, it has nonetheless already proved to be a substantial computational tool in analyzing human abilities in physical workplaces. It is being applied to actual problems involving space vehicle inhabitants, helicopter pilots, maintenance technicians, foot soldiers, and tractor drivers. This broad range of applications is precisely the target we intended to reach. The general capabilities embedded in Jack attempt to mirror certain aspects of human performance, rather than the specific requirements of the corresponding workplace. We view the Jack system as the basis of a virtual animated agent that can carry out tasks and instructions in a simulated 3D environment. While we have not yet fooled anyone into believing that the Jack figure is real , its behaviors are becoming more reasonable and its repertoire of actions more extensive. When interactive control becomes more labor intensive than natural language instructional control, we will have reached a significant milestone toward an intelligent agent

Continually improving grounded natural language understanding through human-robot dialog

As robots become ubiquitous in homes and workplaces such as hospitals and factories, they must be able to communicate with humans. Several kinds of knowledge are required to understand and respond to a human's natural language commands and questions. If a person requests an assistant robot to take me to Alice's office, the robot must know that Alice is a person who owns some unique office, and that take me means it should navigate there. Similarly, if a person requests bring me the heavy, green mug, the robot must have accurate mental models of the physical concepts heavy, green, and mug. To avoid forcing humans to use key phrases or words robots already know, this thesis focuses on helping robots understanding new language constructs through interactions with humans and with the world around them. To understand a command in natural language, a robot must first convert that command to an internal representation that it can reason with. Semantic parsing is a method for performing this conversion, and the target representation is often semantic forms represented as predicate logic with lambda calculus. Traditional semantic parsing relies on hand-crafted resources from a human expert: an ontology of concepts, a lexicon connecting language to those concepts, and training examples of language with abstract meanings. One thrust of this thesis is to perform semantic parsing with sparse initial data. We use the conversations between a robot and human users to induce pairs of natural language utterances with the target semantic forms a robot discovers through its questions, reducing the annotation effort of creating training examples for parsing. We use this data to build more dialog-capable robots in new domains with much less expert human effort (Thomason et al., 2015; Padmakumar et al., 2017). Meanings of many language concepts are bound to the physical world. Understanding object properties and categories, such as heavy, green, and mug requires interacting with and perceiving the physical world. Embodied robots can use manipulation capabilities, such as pushing, picking up, and dropping objects to gather sensory data about them. This data can be used to understand non-visual concepts like heavy and empty (e.g. get the empty carton of milk from the fridge), and assist with concepts that have both visual and non-visual expression (e.g. tall things look big and also exert force sooner than short things when pressed down on). A second thrust of this thesis focuses on strategies for learning these concepts using multi-modal sensory information. We use human-in-the-loop learning to get labels between concept words and actual objects in the environment (Thomason et al., 2016, 2017). We also explore ways to tease out polysemy and synonymy in concept words (Thomason and Mooney, 2017) such as light, which can refer to a weight or a color, the latter sense being synonymous with pale. Additionally, pushing, picking up, and dropping objects to gather sensory information is prohibitively time-consuming, so we investigate strategies for using linguistic information and human input to expedite exploration when learning a new concept (Thomason et al., 2018). Finally, we build an integrated agent with both parsing and perception capabilities that learns from conversations with users to improve both components over time. We demonstrate that parser learning from conversations (Thomason et al., 2015) can be combined with multi-modal perception (Thomason et al., 2016) using predicate-object labels gathered through opportunistic active learning (Thomason et al., 2017) during those conversations to improve performance for understanding natural language commands from humans. Human users also qualitatively rate this integrated learning agent as more usable after it has improved from conversation-based learning.Computer Science

Artificial general intelligence: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Artificial General Intelligence, AGI 2009, Arlington, Virginia, USA, March 6-9, 2009

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) research focuses on the original and ultimate goal of AI – to create broad human-like and transhuman intelligence, by exploring all available paths, including theoretical and experimental computer science, cognitive science, neuroscience, and innovative interdisciplinary methodologies. Due to the difficulty of this task, for the last few decades the majority of AI researchers have focused on what has been called narrow AI – the production of AI systems displaying intelligence regarding specific, highly constrained tasks. In recent years, however, more and more researchers have recognized the necessity – and feasibility – of returning to the original goals of the field. Increasingly, there is a call for a transition back to confronting the more difficult issues of human level intelligence and more broadly artificial general intelligence

A usage-based model for the acquisition of syntactic constructions and its application in spoken language understanding

Gaspers J. A usage-based model for the acquisition of syntactic constructions and its application in spoken language understanding. Bielefeld: Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld; 2014