103,231 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Prospects and problems for European legal cooperation concerning prisoners
Ranking and Selecting Multi-Hop Knowledge Paths to Better Predict Human Needs
To make machines better understand sentiments, research needs to move from
polarity identification to understanding the reasons that underlie the
expression of sentiment. Categorizing the goals or needs of humans is one way
to explain the expression of sentiment in text. Humans are good at
understanding situations described in natural language and can easily connect
them to the character's psychological needs using commonsense knowledge. We
present a novel method to extract, rank, filter and select multi-hop relation
paths from a commonsense knowledge resource to interpret the expression of
sentiment in terms of their underlying human needs. We efficiently integrate
the acquired knowledge paths in a neural model that interfaces context
representations with knowledge using a gated attention mechanism. We assess the
model's performance on a recently published dataset for categorizing human
needs. Selectively integrating knowledge paths boosts performance and
establishes a new state-of-the-art. Our model offers interpretability through
the learned attention map over commonsense knowledge paths. Human evaluation
highlights the relevance of the encoded knowledge
Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse
The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational
linguistics, is to design methods capable of analyzing people's argumentation.
In this article, we go beyond the state of the art in several ways. (i) We deal
with actual Web data and take up the challenges given by the variety of
registers, multiple domains, and unrestricted noisy user-generated Web
discourse. (ii) We bridge the gap between normative argumentation theories and
argumentation phenomena encountered in actual data by adapting an argumentation
model tested in an extensive annotation study. (iii) We create a new gold
standard corpus (90k tokens in 340 documents) and experiment with several
machine learning methods to identify argument components. We offer the data,
source codes, and annotation guidelines to the community under free licenses.
Our findings show that argumentation mining in user-generated Web discourse is
a feasible but challenging task.Comment: Cite as: Habernal, I. & Gurevych, I. (2017). Argumentation Mining in
User-Generated Web Discourse. Computational Linguistics 43(1), pp. 125-17
- …