On Approximating Restricted Cycle Covers

A cycle cover of a graph is a set of cycles such that every vertex is part of exactly one cycle. An L-cycle cover is a cycle cover in which the length of every cycle is in the set L. The weight of a cycle cover of an edge-weighted graph is the sum of the weights of its edges. We come close to settling the complexity and approximability of computing L-cycle covers. On the one hand, we show that for almost all L, computing L-cycle covers of maximum weight in directed and undirected graphs is APX-hard and NP-hard. Most of our hardness results hold even if the edge weights are restricted to zero and one. On the other hand, we show that the problem of computing L-cycle covers of maximum weight can be approximated within a factor of 2 for undirected graphs and within a factor of 8/3 in the case of directed graphs. This holds for arbitrary sets L.Comment: To appear in SIAM Journal on Computing. Minor change

Deterministic Graph Exploration with Advice

We consider the task of graph exploration. An $n$-node graph has unlabeled nodes, and all ports at any node of degree $d$ are arbitrarily numbered $0,\dots, d-1$. A mobile agent has to visit all nodes and stop. The exploration time is the number of edge traversals. We consider the problem of how much knowledge the agent has to have a priori, in order to explore the graph in a given time, using a deterministic algorithm. This a priori information (advice) is provided to the agent by an oracle, in the form of a binary string, whose length is called the size of advice. We consider two types of oracles. The instance oracle knows the entire instance of the exploration problem, i.e., the port-numbered map of the graph and the starting node of the agent in this map. The map oracle knows the port-numbered map of the graph but does not know the starting node of the agent. We first consider exploration in polynomial time, and determine the exact minimum size of advice to achieve it. This size is $\log\log\log n -\Theta(1)$, for both types of oracles. When advice is large, there are two natural time thresholds: $\Theta(n^2)$ for a map oracle, and $\Theta(n)$ for an instance oracle, that can be achieved with sufficiently large advice. We show that, with a map oracle, time $\Theta(n^2)$ cannot be improved in general, regardless of the size of advice. We also show that the smallest size of advice to achieve this time is larger than $n^\delta$, for any $\delta <1/3$. For an instance oracle, advice of size $O(n\log n)$ is enough to achieve time $O(n)$. We show that, with any advice of size $o(n\log n)$, the time of exploration must be at least $n^\epsilon$, for any $\epsilon <2$, and with any advice of size $O(n)$, the time must be $\Omega(n^2)$. We also investigate minimum advice sufficient for fast exploration of hamiltonian graphs

Preprocessing under uncertainty

In this work we study preprocessing for tractable problems when part of the input is unknown or uncertain. This comes up naturally if, e.g., the load of some machines or the congestion of some roads is not known far enough in advance, or if we have to regularly solve a problem over instances that are largely similar, e.g., daily airport scheduling with few charter flights. Unlike robust optimization, which also studies settings like this, our goal lies not in computing solutions that are (approximately) good for every instantiation. Rather, we seek to preprocess the known parts of the input, to speed up finding an optimal solution once the missing data is known. We present efficient algorithms that given an instance with partially uncertain input generate an instance of size polynomial in the amount of uncertain data that is equivalent for every instantiation of the unknown part. Concretely, we obtain such algorithms for Minimum Spanning Tree, Minimum Weight Matroid Basis, and Maximum Cardinality Bipartite Maxing, where respectively the weight of edges, weight of elements, and the availability of vertices is unknown for part of the input. Furthermore, we show that there are tractable problems, such as Small Connected Vertex Cover, for which one cannot hope to obtain similar results.Comment: 18 page

Directed paths with few or many colors in colored directed graphs

Given a graph $D=(V(D),A(D))$ and a coloring of $D$, not necessarily a proper coloring of either the arcs or the vertices of $D$, we consider the complexity of finding a path of $D$ from a given vertex $s$ to another given vertex $t$ with as few different colors as possible, and of finding one with as many different colors as possible. We show that the first problem is polynomial-time solvable, and that the second problem is NP-hard. \u

Minimum cycle and homology bases of surface embedded graphs

We study the problems of finding a minimum cycle basis (a minimum weight set of cycles that form a basis for the cycle space) and a minimum homology basis (a minimum weight set of cycles that generates the $1$-dimensional ($\mathbb{Z}_2$)-homology classes) of an undirected graph embedded on a surface. The problems are closely related, because the minimum cycle basis of a graph contains its minimum homology basis, and the minimum homology basis of the $1$-skeleton of any graph is exactly its minimum cycle basis. For the minimum cycle basis problem, we give a deterministic $O(n^\omega+2^{2g}n^2+m)$-time algorithm for graphs embedded on an orientable surface of genus $g$. The best known existing algorithms for surface embedded graphs are those for general graphs: an $O(m^\omega)$ time Monte Carlo algorithm and a deterministic $O(nm^2/\log n + n^2 m)$ time algorithm. For the minimum homology basis problem, we give a deterministic $O((g+b)^3 n \log n + m)$-time algorithm for graphs embedded on an orientable or non-orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components, assuming shortest paths are unique, improving on existing algorithms for many values of $g$ and $n$. The assumption of unique shortest paths can be avoided with high probability using randomization or deterministically by increasing the running time of the homology basis algorithm by a factor of $O(\log n)$.Comment: A preliminary version of this work was presented at the 32nd Annual International Symposium on Computational Geometr