39 research outputs found

    New Subset Selection Algorithms for Low Rank Approximation: Offline and Online

    Full text link
    Subset selection for the rank kk approximation of an nΓ—dn\times d matrix AA offers improvements in the interpretability of matrices, as well as a variety of computational savings. This problem is well-understood when the error measure is the Frobenius norm, with various tight algorithms known even in challenging models such as the online model, where an algorithm must select the column subset irrevocably when the columns arrive one by one. In contrast, for other matrix losses, optimal trade-offs between the subset size and approximation quality have not been settled, even in the offline setting. We give a number of results towards closing these gaps. In the offline setting, we achieve nearly optimal bicriteria algorithms in two settings. First, we remove a k\sqrt k factor from a result of [SWZ19] when the loss function is any entrywise loss with an approximate triangle inequality and at least linear growth. Our result is tight for the β„“1\ell_1 loss. We give a similar improvement for entrywise β„“p\ell_p losses for p>2p>2, improving a previous distortion of k1βˆ’1/pk^{1-1/p} to k1/2βˆ’1/pk^{1/2-1/p}. Our results come from a technique which replaces the use of a well-conditioned basis with a slightly larger spanning set for which any vector can be expressed as a linear combination with small Euclidean norm. We show that this technique also gives the first oblivious β„“p\ell_p subspace embeddings for 1<p<21<p<2 with O~(d1/p)\tilde O(d^{1/p}) distortion, which is nearly optimal and closes a long line of work. In the online setting, we give the first online subset selection algorithm for β„“p\ell_p subspace approximation and entrywise β„“p\ell_p low rank approximation by implementing sensitivity sampling online, which is challenging due to the sequential nature of sensitivity sampling. Our main technique is an online algorithm for detecting when an approximately optimal subspace changes substantially.Comment: To appear in STOC 2023; abstract shortene

    High-Dimensional Geometric Streaming in Polynomial Space

    Full text link
    Many existing algorithms for streaming geometric data analysis have been plagued by exponential dependencies in the space complexity, which are undesirable for processing high-dimensional data sets. In particular, once dβ‰₯log⁑nd\geq\log n, there are no known non-trivial streaming algorithms for problems such as maintaining convex hulls and L\"owner-John ellipsoids of nn points, despite a long line of work in streaming computational geometry since [AHV04]. We simultaneously improve these results to poly(d,log⁑n)\mathrm{poly}(d,\log n) bits of space by trading off with a poly(d,log⁑n)\mathrm{poly}(d,\log n) factor distortion. We achieve these results in a unified manner, by designing the first streaming algorithm for maintaining a coreset for β„“βˆž\ell_\infty subspace embeddings with poly(d,log⁑n)\mathrm{poly}(d,\log n) space and poly(d,log⁑n)\mathrm{poly}(d,\log n) distortion. Our algorithm also gives similar guarantees in the \emph{online coreset} model. Along the way, we sharpen results for online numerical linear algebra by replacing a log condition number dependence with a log⁑n\log n dependence, answering a question of [BDM+20]. Our techniques provide a novel connection between leverage scores, a fundamental object in numerical linear algebra, and computational geometry. For β„“p\ell_p subspace embeddings, we give nearly optimal trade-offs between space and distortion for one-pass streaming algorithms. For instance, we give a deterministic coreset using O(d2log⁑n)O(d^2\log n) space and O((dlog⁑n)1/2βˆ’1/p)O((d\log n)^{1/2-1/p}) distortion for p>2p>2, whereas previous deterministic algorithms incurred a poly(n)\mathrm{poly}(n) factor in the space or the distortion [CDW18]. Our techniques have implications in the offline setting, where we give optimal trade-offs between the space complexity and distortion of subspace sketch data structures. To do this, we give an elementary proof of a "change of density" theorem of [LT80] and make it algorithmic.Comment: Abstract shortened to meet arXiv limits; v2 fix statements concerning online condition numbe
    corecore