Recurrence networks - A novel paradigm for nonlinear time series analysis

This paper presents a new approach for analysing structural properties of time series from complex systems. Starting from the concept of recurrences in phase space, the recurrence matrix of a time series is interpreted as the adjacency matrix of an associated complex network which links different points in time if the evolution of the considered states is very similar. A critical comparison of these recurrence networks with similar existing techniques is presented, revealing strong conceptual benefits of the new approach which can be considered as a unifying framework for transforming time series into complex networks that also includes other methods as special cases. It is demonstrated that there are fundamental relationships between the topological properties of recurrence networks and the statistical properties of the phase space density of the underlying dynamical system. Hence, the network description yields new quantitative characteristics of the dynamical complexity of a time series, which substantially complement existing measures of recurrence quantification analysis

Centrality Metric for Dynamic Networks

Centrality is an important notion in network analysis and is used to measure the degree to which network structure contributes to the importance of a node in a network. While many different centrality measures exist, most of them apply to static networks. Most networks, on the other hand, are dynamic in nature, evolving over time through the addition or deletion of nodes and edges. A popular approach to analyzing such networks represents them by a static network that aggregates all edges observed over some time period. This approach, however, under or overestimates centrality of some nodes. We address this problem by introducing a novel centrality metric for dynamic network analysis. This metric exploits an intuition that in order for one node in a dynamic network to influence another over some period of time, there must exist a path that connects the source and destination nodes through intermediaries at different times. We demonstrate on an example network that the proposed metric leads to a very different ranking than analysis of an equivalent static network. We use dynamic centrality to study a dynamic citations network and contrast results to those reached by static network analysis.Comment: in KDD workshop on Mining and Learning in Graphs (MLG