810 research outputs found
Parameterized Approximation Algorithms for Bidirected Steiner Network Problems
The Directed Steiner Network (DSN) problem takes as input a directed
edge-weighted graph and a set of
demand pairs. The aim is to compute the cheapest network for
which there is an path for each . It is known
that this problem is notoriously hard as there is no
-approximation algorithm under Gap-ETH, even when parametrizing
the runtime by [Dinur & Manurangsi, ITCS 2018]. In light of this, we
systematically study several special cases of DSN and determine their
parameterized approximability for the parameter .
For the bi-DSN problem, the aim is to compute a planar
optimum solution in a bidirected graph , i.e., for every edge
of the reverse edge exists and has the same weight. This problem
is a generalization of several well-studied special cases. Our main result is
that this problem admits a parameterized approximation scheme (PAS) for . We
also prove that our result is tight in the sense that (a) the runtime of our
PAS cannot be significantly improved, and (b) it is unlikely that a PAS exists
for any generalization of bi-DSN, unless FPT=W[1].
One important special case of DSN is the Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph
(SCSS) problem, for which the solution network needs to strongly
connect a given set of terminals. It has been observed before that for SCSS
a parameterized -approximation exists when parameterized by [Chitnis et
al., IPEC 2013]. We give a tight inapproximability result by showing that for
no parameterized -approximation algorithm exists under
Gap-ETH. Additionally we show that when restricting the input of SCSS to
bidirected graphs, the problem remains NP-hard but becomes FPT for
Hardness of Vertex Deletion and Project Scheduling
Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, we show strong inapproximability
results for two natural vertex deletion problems on directed graphs: for any
integer and arbitrary small , the Feedback Vertex Set
problem and the DAG Vertex Deletion problem are inapproximable within a factor
even on graphs where the vertices can be almost partitioned into
solutions. This gives a more structured and therefore stronger UGC-based
hardness result for the Feedback Vertex Set problem that is also simpler
(albeit using the "It Ain't Over Till It's Over" theorem) than the previous
hardness result.
In comparison to the classical Feedback Vertex Set problem, the DAG Vertex
Deletion problem has received little attention and, although we think it is a
natural and interesting problem, the main motivation for our inapproximability
result stems from its relationship with the classical Discrete Time-Cost
Tradeoff Problem. More specifically, our results imply that the deadline
version is NP-hard to approximate within any constant assuming the Unique Games
Conjecture. This explains the difficulty in obtaining good approximation
algorithms for that problem and further motivates previous alternative
approaches such as bicriteria approximations.Comment: 18 pages, 1 figur
Inapproximability of H-Transversal/Packing
Given an undirected graph G=(V,E) and a fixed pattern graph H with k vertices, we consider the H-Transversal and H-Packing problems. The former asks to find the smallest subset S of vertices such that the subgraph induced by V - S does not have H as a subgraph, and the latter asks to find the maximum number of pairwise disjoint k-subsets S1, ..., Sm such that the subgraph induced by each Si has H as a subgraph.
We prove that if H is 2-connected, H-Transversal and H-Packing are almost as hard to approximate as general k-Hypergraph Vertex Cover and k-Set Packing, so it is NP-hard to approximate them within a factor of Omega(k) and Omega(k / polylog(k)) respectively. We also show that there is a 1-connected H where H-Transversal admits an O(log k)-approximation algorithm, so that the connectivity requirement cannot be relaxed from 2 to 1. For a special case of H-Transversal where H is a (family of) cycles, we mention the implication of our result to the related Feedback Vertex Set problem, and give a different hardness proof for directed graphs
- β¦