10,881 research outputs found

    Reoptimization of Some Maximum Weight Induced Hereditary Subgraph Problems

    Get PDF
    The reoptimization issue studied in this paper can be described as follows: given an instance I of some problem Π, an optimal solution OPT for Π in I and an instance Iâ€Č resulting from a local perturbation of I that consists of insertions or removals of a small number of data, we wish to use OPT in order to solve Π in I', either optimally or by guaranteeing an approximation ratio better than that guaranteed by an ex nihilo computation and with running time better than that needed for such a computation. We use this setting in order to study weighted versions of several representatives of a broad class of problems known in the literature as maximum induced hereditary subgraph problems. The main problems studied are max independent set, max k-colorable subgraph and max split subgraph under vertex insertions and deletion

    From Gap-ETH to FPT-Inapproximability: Clique, Dominating Set, and More

    Full text link
    We consider questions that arise from the intersection between the areas of polynomial-time approximation algorithms, subexponential-time algorithms, and fixed-parameter tractable algorithms. The questions, which have been asked several times (e.g., [Marx08, FGMS12, DF13]), are whether there is a non-trivial FPT-approximation algorithm for the Maximum Clique (Clique) and Minimum Dominating Set (DomSet) problems parameterized by the size of the optimal solution. In particular, letting OPT\text{OPT} be the optimum and NN be the size of the input, is there an algorithm that runs in t(OPT)poly(N)t(\text{OPT})\text{poly}(N) time and outputs a solution of size f(OPT)f(\text{OPT}), for any functions tt and ff that are independent of NN (for Clique, we want f(OPT)=ω(1)f(\text{OPT})=\omega(1))? In this paper, we show that both Clique and DomSet admit no non-trivial FPT-approximation algorithm, i.e., there is no o(OPT)o(\text{OPT})-FPT-approximation algorithm for Clique and no f(OPT)f(\text{OPT})-FPT-approximation algorithm for DomSet, for any function ff (e.g., this holds even if ff is the Ackermann function). In fact, our results imply something even stronger: The best way to solve Clique and DomSet, even approximately, is to essentially enumerate all possibilities. Our results hold under the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH) [Dinur16, MR16], which states that no 2o(n)2^{o(n)}-time algorithm can distinguish between a satisfiable 3SAT formula and one which is not even (1−ϔ)(1 - \epsilon)-satisfiable for some constant Ï”>0\epsilon > 0. Besides Clique and DomSet, we also rule out non-trivial FPT-approximation for Maximum Balanced Biclique, Maximum Subgraphs with Hereditary Properties, and Maximum Induced Matching in bipartite graphs. Additionally, we rule out ko(1)k^{o(1)}-FPT-approximation algorithm for Densest kk-Subgraph although this ratio does not yet match the trivial O(k)O(k)-approximation algorithm.Comment: 43 pages. To appear in FOCS'1

    Near-Optimal Approximate Shortest Paths and Transshipment in Distributed and Streaming Models

    Full text link
    We present a method for solving the transshipment problem - also known as uncapacitated minimum cost flow - up to a multiplicative error of 1+Δ1 + \varepsilon in undirected graphs with non-negative edge weights using a tailored gradient descent algorithm. Using O~(⋅)\tilde{O}(\cdot) to hide polylogarithmic factors in nn (the number of nodes in the graph), our gradient descent algorithm takes O~(Δ−2)\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}) iterations, and in each iteration it solves an instance of the transshipment problem up to a multiplicative error of polylog⁥n\operatorname{polylog} n. In particular, this allows us to perform a single iteration by computing a solution on a sparse spanner of logarithmic stretch. Using a randomized rounding scheme, we can further extend the method to finding approximate solutions for the single-source shortest paths (SSSP) problem. As a consequence, we improve upon prior work by obtaining the following results: (1) Broadcast CONGEST model: (1+Δ)(1 + \varepsilon)-approximate SSSP using O~((n+D)Δ−3)\tilde{O}((\sqrt{n} + D)\varepsilon^{-3}) rounds, where D D is the (hop) diameter of the network. (2) Broadcast congested clique model: (1+Δ)(1 + \varepsilon)-approximate transshipment and SSSP using O~(Δ−2)\tilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-2}) rounds. (3) Multipass streaming model: (1+Δ)(1 + \varepsilon)-approximate transshipment and SSSP using O~(n)\tilde{O}(n) space and O~(Δ−2)\tilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-2}) passes. The previously fastest SSSP algorithms for these models leverage sparse hop sets. We bypass the hop set construction; computing a spanner is sufficient with our method. The above bounds assume non-negative edge weights that are polynomially bounded in nn; for general non-negative weights, running times scale with the logarithm of the maximum ratio between non-zero weights.Comment: Accepted to SIAM Journal on Computing. Preliminary version in DISC 2017. Abstract shortened to fit arXiv's limitation to 1920 character

    A cutting-plane approach to the edge-weighted maximal clique problem

    Get PDF
    We investigated the computational performance of a cutting-plane algorithm for the problem of determining a maximal subclique in an edge-weighted complete graph. Our numerical results are contrasted with reports on closely related problems for which cutting-plane approaches perform well in instances of moderate size. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that our approach already in the case of n = 15 or N = 25 nodes in the underlying graph typically neither produces an integral solution nor yields a good approximation to the true optimal objective function value. This result seems to shed some doubt on the universal applicability of cuttingplane approaches as an efficient means to solve linear (0, 1)-programming problems of moderate size

    Parameterized Approximation Schemes using Graph Widths

    Full text link
    Combining the techniques of approximation algorithms and parameterized complexity has long been considered a promising research area, but relatively few results are currently known. In this paper we study the parameterized approximability of a number of problems which are known to be hard to solve exactly when parameterized by treewidth or clique-width. Our main contribution is to present a natural randomized rounding technique that extends well-known ideas and can be used for both of these widths. Applying this very generic technique we obtain approximation schemes for a number of problems, evading both polynomial-time inapproximability and parameterized intractability bounds

    Super-Fast Distributed Algorithms for Metric Facility Location

    Full text link
    This paper presents a distributed O(1)-approximation algorithm, with expected-O(log⁥log⁥n)O(\log \log n) running time, in the CONGEST\mathcal{CONGEST} model for the metric facility location problem on a size-nn clique network. Though metric facility location has been considered by a number of researchers in low-diameter settings, this is the first sub-logarithmic-round algorithm for the problem that yields an O(1)-approximation in the setting of non-uniform facility opening costs. In order to obtain this result, our paper makes three main technical contributions. First, we show a new lower bound for metric facility location, extending the lower bound of B\u{a}doiu et al. (ICALP 2005) that applies only to the special case of uniform facility opening costs. Next, we demonstrate a reduction of the distributed metric facility location problem to the problem of computing an O(1)-ruling set of an appropriate spanning subgraph. Finally, we present a sub-logarithmic-round (in expectation) algorithm for computing a 2-ruling set in a spanning subgraph of a clique. Our algorithm accomplishes this by using a combination of randomized and deterministic sparsification.Comment: 15 pages, 2 figures. This is the full version of a paper that appeared in ICALP 201
    • 

    corecore