8 research outputs found
Sense and Affect
Sense and Affect exposes the limits of important recent strands in continental philosophy. It questions the necessity of a certain language of violence, otherness, disruption and pathos saturating Jacques Derrida's texts and the texts of those having a proximity to Derrida's deconstructionist project. This book establishes a connection between such affective terminology and a common, if heterogeneously expressed, theoretical inadequacy binding Derrida and writers such as Lyotard, Foucault, Caputo and Nancy. Their failure to penetrate a presumed irreducibility of suffering in the world is shown to be linked to their dependence on the assumption of an irreducible tension at the origin of meaning. This book develops a fresh method of thought thoroughly unraveling the presuppositions of deconstructive orientations and uncovering a finer silt of the world than is seen via such discourses
Recommended from our members
Effects of U.S. commodity programs on farm growth
The U.S. farm sector has undergone dramatic structural change during the
past fifty years, a chief result being that the number of large farms has increased
relative to the number of small farms. Numerous agricultural policies have been
instituted, with the partial objective of preserving the family farm. At the same
time, a number of studies have attempted to ascertain the contribution of various
forces, including farm programs, toward the observed changes in average farm
size. These studies have tended to concentrate on aggregate effects, ignoring farm-level
and dynamic effects of program and nonprogram factors on farm growth.
The present study overcomes such limitations by utilizing a farm-level
dynamic growth model which links consumption, production, and investment
decisions. Steady-state comparative static and local comparative dynamic analysis
of the dynamic model solutions indicate qualitative effects of program and
nonprogram factors on farm growth. Simulation of quantitative effects are conducted on econometric estimates of the dynamic model solutions, using Kansas
wheat farm data.
Empirical results show that set-aside-percentage-type instruments (required
and voluntary set-aside percentages) induce longrun net equity increases in small
farms and longrun net equity decreases in large farms. In both size classes, set-aside
instruments increase longrun land holdings, the increases being greater in
larger than in smaller farms. After considering effects on rented land, the effect of
set-aside-type instruments on overall scale of operation is negligible.
Payment-rate-type instruments (per-acre deficiency, voluntary and paid
diversion payment rates) increase longrun net equity and consumption in both
small and large farms. They lead to longrun land ownership increases in small
farms and decreases in large farms. However, they lead also to increases in rented
land, the increase being greater in larger than in smaller farms. Net effect on
scale of operation is nonsignificant.
Finally, nonprogram factors affect growth also. Technical change increases
net equity and landholding in large farms more than in small farms. In both large
and small farms, increases in prices of land's substitutes, lead to net equity
increases, whereas increases in prices of complements reduce net equity. In the
longrun, output price increases encourage consumption and reduce net equity
Disclosure and inscription: Heidegger, Derrida, and the technological difference
The relationship of Jacques Derrida and Martin Heidegger has always been complex, encompassing an entanglement of two already immense networks and suspended between proximities and distances from infinitesimal to radical. Its peculiarity is evident in the way in which Derrida strategically inscribes his own text at the margin of Heidegger's thought via a double or cl6tural gesture which articulates the paradox that Derrida writes with Heidegger against Heidegger. One of the most decisive aspects of this gesture is Derrida's deconstruction of Heidegger's claims regarding the relation between technology and philosophy. In "The Question Concerning Technology" and accompanying essays Heidegger opens up a way of reflecting upon the essence of technology moves against its metaphysical determination specifying, moreover, the sense of modern technology as a mode of disclosure. These reflections are, however, ambiguous. Heidegger is one of the first thinkers to confront technology in philosophical terms, and yet he wishes to purify thinking of originary technicity. Technology remains a question, and as a question asked by thinking, thinking is not technical. In other words, thinking for Heidegger, is constituted in its very difference from technology. This is the move that must be deconstructed. In simultaneously repeating and displacing the Heideggerian scheme, Derrida elaborates an infinitesimal and decisive différance between the thinking of Being and his own notion of "writing" (Vecriture) or generalized inscription. What is crucial is that as against Heidegger's Being, the general text is not an essence of technics nor is it a proper thinking opposed to technology. On the contrary, Derrida's main point, among other things, against Heidegger, is that technology has always already begun, that it is originary with respect to the history of Being and thinking. In this study I examine the stakes and implications of Derrida's move along with a possible Heideggerian response. To begin with, I develop a reading of Heidegger's text that shows the import of technology to his work as a whole and its centrality to the thinking of Being as difference. I then take up the question of Derrida's deconstruction of Heidegger's analysis of the history of Being and its technological completion as this is played out in The Post Card and related texts. Following this I revert back to Derrida's now "classic" writings of the late 1960s and early 1970s and explore the arguments that relate contemporary developments in technology, science, and the media to the problematic of writing and to the closure of logocentric metaphysics. The preceding chapters lay the groundwork for me to then offer a critical reading of Derrida's text that locates in the articulations and assumptions of deconstruction certain indications of its belonging, within the horizon of Heidegger's thinking of technology. Finally, I offer a reading of some of Derrida's later texts with the aim of showing that and how deconstruction emerges as an affirmative technology
Disclosure and inscription : Heidegger, Derrida, and the technological difference
The relationship of Jacques Derrida and Martin Heidegger has always been complex, encompassing an entanglement of two already immense networks and suspended between proximities and distances from infinitesimal to radical. Its peculiarity is evident in the way in which Derrida strategically inscribes his own text at the margin of Heidegger's thought via a double or cl6tural gesture which articulates the paradox that Derrida writes with Heidegger against Heidegger. One of the most decisive aspects of this gesture is Derrida's deconstruction of Heidegger's claims regarding the relation between technology and philosophy. In "The Question Concerning Technology" and accompanying essays Heidegger opens up a way of reflecting upon the essence of technology moves against its metaphysical determination specifying, moreover, the sense of modern technology as a mode of disclosure. These reflections are, however, ambiguous. Heidegger is one of the first thinkers to confront technology in philosophical terms, and yet he wishes to purify thinking of originary technicity. Technology remains a question, and as a question asked by thinking, thinking is not technical. In other words, thinking for Heidegger, is constituted in its very difference from technology. This is the move that must be deconstructed. In simultaneously repeating and displacing the Heideggerian scheme, Derrida elaborates an infinitesimal and decisive différance between the thinking of Being and his own notion of "writing" (Vecriture) or generalized inscription. What is crucial is that as against Heidegger's Being, the general text is not an essence of technics nor is it a proper thinking opposed to technology. On the contrary, Derrida's main point, among other things, against Heidegger, is that technology has always already begun, that it is originary with respect to the history of Being and thinking. In this study I examine the stakes and implications of Derrida's move along with a possible Heideggerian response. To begin with, I develop a reading of Heidegger's text that shows the import of technology to his work as a whole and its centrality to the thinking of Being as difference. I then take up the question of Derrida's deconstruction of Heidegger's analysis of the history of Being and its technological completion as this is played out in The Post Card and related texts. Following this I revert back to Derrida's now "classic" writings of the late 1960s and early 1970s and explore the arguments that relate contemporary developments in technology, science, and the media to the problematic of writing and to the closure of logocentric metaphysics. The preceding chapters lay the groundwork for me to then offer a critical reading of Derrida's text that locates in the articulations and assumptions of deconstruction certain indications of its belonging, within the horizon of Heidegger's thinking of technology. Finally, I offer a reading of some of Derrida's later texts with the aim of showing that and how deconstruction emerges as an affirmative technology.EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceArts and Humanities Research Council (Great Britain) (AHRC)GBUnited Kingdo
Viet Nam Generation, Volume 4, Number 3-4
Edited by Dan Duffy and Kali Tal. Contributing editors: Renny Christopher. David DeRose, Alan Farrell. Cynthia Fuchs, William M. King. Bill Shields, Tony Williams, and David Willson
Mystery of the Other, and its reduction in Rahner and Levinas
Karl Rahner, responding to the problems raised by Kant's critical philosophy, sought to
present a Thomistic metaphysics of realism in a modern thought-form through a
reduction of the interrogative thrust of the intellect to its possibility conditions, and so,
like Marechal before him, attain an absolute affirmation of Being. Rahner's
transcendental system, however, would seem to have been overtaken by a more
existential stress in phenomenological thinking.
Emmanuel Levinas, with his thought of the Other and his attempt at an excendence from
Being, would seem at first glance to sit uncomfortably alongside Rahner's system, yet,
a closer reading of both unearths a remarkable convergence in their thinking. The deeper
phenomenological reduction which Levinas undertakes to reveal the inter-subjective
context of consciousness helps to humanise Rahner's approach. This thesis attempts a
fruitful confrontation of both thinkers by, firstly, indicating the tension between
Rahner's own philosophical propaedeutic and his theological writings, particularly on
grace, mystery and the love of God and neighbour, where he affirms that human
existence is ultimately reductio in mysterium and that human fulfilment is to be found
in a personal relationship with a human Other. A second purpose is to show how these
same theological themes can be developed from within Levinas' own thought, and how
his own philosophy can provide a worthwhile context for Christian theology.
The thesis unfolds by considering the various methods - metaphysical,
transcendental and phenomenological - which surround both thinkers (Chapter 1) and
then proceeds to outline their various philosophical influences (Chapter 2). Since the
notion of Being as self-presence is fundamental in Rahner, and since Levinas refuses
a philosophy of presence, Chapter 3 questions the privilege of presence. This will lead,
in its turn, to a rethinking of the notion of subjectivity: the subject is not to be consider
as presence-to-self but as a relationship with the Other (Chapter 4). This relationship is
experienced in Desire (Chapter 5) and in the responsibility experienced before the face
of the Other (Chapter 6). The relation between ethics (the good) and Being is pursued
in chapter 7. Finally, the notion of mystery is indicated as the theme which inspires the
work of both Rahner and Levinas (Chapter 8). Rahner's unmastered mystery will
become Levinas' incomprehensible infinity in the presence of which the subject is called
to response and responsibility
Bowdoin Orient v.121-122, no.1-21 (1991-1992)
https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/bowdoinorient-1990s/1003/thumbnail.jp
The Viet Nam Generation Big Book
An anthology of essays, narrative, poetry and graphics published in lieu of a 1993 issue of Viet Nam Generation, intended to be used as a textbook for teaching about the 1960s. Edited by Dan Duffy and Kali Tal. Contributing editors: Renny Christopher. David DeRose, Alan Farrell. Cynthia Fuchs, William M. King. Bill Shields, Tony Williams, and David Willson