Testing Small Set Expansion in General Graphs

We consider the problem of testing small set expansion for general graphs. A graph $G$ is a $(k,\phi)$-expander if every subset of volume at most $k$ has conductance at least $\phi$. Small set expansion has recently received significant attention due to its close connection to the unique games conjecture, the local graph partitioning algorithms and locally testable codes. We give testers with two-sided error and one-sided error in the adjacency list model that allows degree and neighbor queries to the oracle of the input graph. The testers take as input an $n$-vertex graph $G$, a volume bound $k$, an expansion bound $\phi$ and a distance parameter $\varepsilon>0$. For the two-sided error tester, with probability at least $2/3$, it accepts the graph if it is a $(k,\phi)$-expander and rejects the graph if it is $\varepsilon$-far from any $(k^*,\phi^*)$-expander, where $k^*=\Theta(k\varepsilon)$ and $\phi^*=\Theta(\frac{\phi^4}{\min\{\log(4m/k),\log n\}\cdot(\ln k)})$. The query complexity and running time of the tester are $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{m}\phi^{-4}\varepsilon^{-2})$, where $m$ is the number of edges of the graph. For the one-sided error tester, it accepts every $(k,\phi)$-expander, and with probability at least $2/3$, rejects every graph that is $\varepsilon$-far from $(k^*,\phi^*)$-expander, where $k^*=O(k^{1-\xi})$ and $\phi^*=O(\xi\phi^2)$ for any $0<\xi<1$. The query complexity and running time of this tester are $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{\frac{n}{\varepsilon^3}}+\frac{k}{\varepsilon \phi^4})$. We also give a two-sided error tester with smaller gap between $\phi^*$ and $\phi$ in the rotation map model that allows (neighbor, index) queries and degree queries.Comment: 23 pages; STACS 201

Orthogonal Graph Drawing with Inflexible Edges

We consider the problem of creating plane orthogonal drawings of 4-planar graphs (planar graphs with maximum degree 4) with constraints on the number of bends per edge. More precisely, we have a flexibility function assigning to each edge $e$ a natural number $\mathrm{flex}(e)$, its flexibility. The problem FlexDraw asks whether there exists an orthogonal drawing such that each edge $e$ has at most $\mathrm{flex}(e)$ bends. It is known that FlexDraw is NP-hard if $\mathrm{flex}(e) = 0$ for every edge $e$. On the other hand, FlexDraw can be solved efficiently if $\mathrm{flex}(e) \ge 1$ and is trivial if $\mathrm{flex}(e) \ge 2$ for every edge $e$. To close the gap between the NP-hardness for $\mathrm{flex}(e) = 0$ and the efficient algorithm for $\mathrm{flex}(e) \ge 1$, we investigate the computational complexity of FlexDraw in case only few edges are inflexible (i.e., have flexibility~$0$). We show that for any $\varepsilon > 0$ FlexDraw is NP-complete for instances with $O(n^\varepsilon)$ inflexible edges with pairwise distance $\Omega(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ (including the case where they induce a matching). On the other hand, we give an FPT-algorithm with running time $O(2^k\cdot n \cdot T_{\mathrm{flow}}(n))$, where $T_{\mathrm{flow}}(n)$ is the time necessary to compute a maximum flow in a planar flow network with multiple sources and sinks, and $k$ is the number of inflexible edges having at least one endpoint of degree 4.Comment: 23 pages, 5 figure

Classification of Minimal Separating Sets in Low Genus Surfaces

Consider a surface $S$ and let $M\subset S$. If $S\setminus M$ is not connected, then we say $M$ \emph{separates} $S$, and we refer to $M$ as a \emph{separating set} of $S$. If $M$ separates $S$, and no proper subset of $M$ separates $S$, then we say $M$ is a \emph{minimal separating set} of $S$. In this paper we use methods of computational combinatorial topology to classify the minimal separating sets of the orientable surfaces of genus $g=2$ and $g=3$. The classification for genus 0 and 1 was done in earlier work, using methods of algebraic topology.Comment: 24 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables (11 pages