3,663 research outputs found

    Distant total sum distinguishing index of graphs

    Full text link
    Let c:VE{1,2,,k}c:V\cup E\to\{1,2,\ldots,k\} be a proper total colouring of a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) with maximum degree Δ\Delta. We say vertices u,vVu,v\in V are sum distinguished if c(u)+euc(e)c(v)+evc(e)c(u)+\sum_{e\ni u}c(e)\neq c(v)+\sum_{e\ni v}c(e). By χ"Σ,r(G)\chi"_{\Sigma,r}(G) we denote the least integer kk admitting such a colouring cc for which every u,vVu,v\in V, uvu\neq v, at distance at most rr from each other are sum distinguished in GG. For every positive integer rr an infinite family of examples is known with χ"Σ,r(G)=Ω(Δr1)\chi"_{\Sigma,r}(G)=\Omega(\Delta^{r-1}). In this paper we prove that χ"Σ,r(G)(2+o(1))Δr1\chi"_{\Sigma,r}(G)\leq (2+o(1))\Delta^{r-1} for every integer r3r\geq 3 and each graph GG, while χ"Σ,2(G)(18+o(1))Δ\chi"_{\Sigma,2}(G)\leq (18+o(1))\Delta.Comment: 10 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1703.0037

    Linear bounds on nowhere-zero group irregularity strength and nowhere-zero group sum chromatic number of graphs

    Full text link
    We investigate the \textit{group irregularity strength}, sg(G)s_g(G), of a graph, i.e. the least integer kk such that taking any Abelian group G\mathcal{G} of order kk, there exists a function f:E(G)Gf:E(G)\rightarrow \mathcal{G} so that the sums of edge labels incident with every vertex are distinct. So far the best upper bound on sg(G)s_g(G) for a general graph GG was exponential in ncn-c, where nn is the order of GG and cc denotes the number of its components. In this note we prove that sg(G)s_g(G) is linear in nn, namely not greater than 2n2n. In fact, we prove a stronger result, as we additionally forbid the identity element of a group to be an edge label or the sum of labels around a vertex. We consider also locally irregular labelings where we require only sums of adjacent vertices to be distinct. For the corresponding graph invariant we prove the general upper bound: Δ(G)+col(G)1\Delta(G)+{\rm col}(G)-1 (where col(G){\rm col}(G) is the coloring number of GG) in the case when we do not use the identity element as an edge label, and a slightly worse one if we additionally forbid it as the sum of labels around a vertex. In the both cases we also provide a sharp upper bound for trees and a constant upper bound for the family of planar graphs

    A note on asymptotically optimal neighbour sum distinguishing colourings

    Full text link
    The least kk admitting a proper edge colouring c:E{1,2,,k}c:E\to\{1,2,\ldots,k\} of a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) without isolated edges such that euc(e)evc(e)\sum_{e\ni u}c(e)\neq \sum_{e\ni v}c(e) for every uvEuv\in E is denoted by χΣ(G)\chi'_{\Sigma}(G). It has been conjectured that χΣ(G)Δ+2\chi'_{\Sigma}(G)\leq \Delta + 2 for every connected graph of order at least three different from the cycle C5C_5, where Δ\Delta is the maximum degree of GG. It is known that χΣ(G)=Δ+O(Δ56ln16Δ)\chi'_{\Sigma}(G) = \Delta + O(\Delta^\frac{5}{6}\ln^\frac{1}{6}\Delta) for a graph GG without isolated edges. We improve this upper bound to χΣ(G)=Δ+O(Δ12)\chi'_{\Sigma}(G) = \Delta + O(\Delta^\frac{1}{2}) using a simpler approach involving a combinatorial algorithm enhanced by the probabilistic method. The same upper bound is provided for the total version of this problem as well.Comment: 9 page

    Distant sum distinguishing index of graphs

    Full text link
    Consider a positive integer rr and a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) with maximum degree Δ\Delta and without isolated edges. The least kk so that a proper edge colouring c:E{1,2,,k}c:E\to\{1,2,\ldots,k\} exists such that euc(e)evc(e)\sum_{e\ni u}c(e)\neq \sum_{e\ni v}c(e) for every pair of distinct vertices u,vu,v at distance at most rr in GG is denoted by χΣ,r(G)\chi'_{\Sigma,r}(G). For r=1r=1 it has been proved that χΣ,1(G)=(1+o(1))Δ\chi'_{\Sigma,1}(G)=(1+o(1))\Delta. For any r2r\geq 2 in turn an infinite family of graphs is known with χΣ,r(G)=Ω(Δr1)\chi'_{\Sigma,r}(G)=\Omega(\Delta^{r-1}). We prove that on the other hand, χΣ,r(G)=O(Δr1)\chi'_{\Sigma,r}(G)=O(\Delta^{r-1}) for r2r\geq 2. In particular we show that χΣ,r(G)6Δr1\chi'_{\Sigma,r}(G)\leq 6\Delta^{r-1} if r4r\geq 4.Comment: 10 page

    Distant sum distinguishing index of graphs with bounded minimum degree

    Full text link
    For any graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) with maximum degree Δ\Delta and without isolated edges, and a positive integer rr, by χΣ,r(G)\chi'_{\Sigma,r}(G) we denote the rr-distant sum distinguishing index of GG. This is the least integer kk for which a proper edge colouring c:E{1,2,,k}c:E\to\{1,2,\ldots,k\} exists such that euc(e)evc(e)\sum_{e\ni u}c(e)\neq \sum_{e\ni v}c(e) for every pair of distinct vertices u,vu,v at distance at most rr in GG. It was conjectured that χΣ,r(G)(1+o(1))Δr1\chi'_{\Sigma,r}(G)\leq (1+o(1))\Delta^{r-1} for every r3r\geq 3. Thus far it has been in particular proved that χΣ,r(G)6Δr1\chi'_{\Sigma,r}(G)\leq 6\Delta^{r-1} if r4r\geq 4. Combining probabilistic and constructive approach, we show that this can be improved to χΣ,r(G)(4+o(1))Δr1\chi'_{\Sigma,r}(G)\leq (4+o(1))\Delta^{r-1} if the minimum degree of GG equals at least ln8Δ\ln^8\Delta.Comment: 12 page

    Sequence variations of the 1-2-3 Conjecture and irregularity strength

    Full text link
    Karonski, Luczak, and Thomason (2004) conjectured that, for any connected graph G on at least three vertices, there exists an edge weighting from {1,2,3} such that adjacent vertices receive different sums of incident edge weights. Bartnicki, Grytczuk, and Niwcyk (2009) made a stronger conjecture, that each edge's weight may be chosen from an arbitrary list of size 3 rather than {1,2,3}. We examine a variation of these conjectures, where each vertex is coloured with a sequence of edge weights. Such a colouring relies on an ordering of the graph's edges, and so two variations arise -- one where we may choose any ordering of the edges and one where the ordering is fixed. In the former case, we bound the list size required for any graph. In the latter, we obtain a bound on list sizes for graphs with sufficiently large minimum degree. We also extend our methods to a list variation of irregularity strength, where each vertex receives a distinct sequence of edge weights.Comment: Accepted to Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Scienc

    Total Vertex Irregularity Strength of Forests

    Full text link
    We investigate a graph parameter called the total vertex irregularity strength (tvs(G)tvs(G)), i.e. the minimal ss such that there is a labeling w:E(G)V(G){1,2,..,s}w: E(G)\cup V(G)\rightarrow \{1,2,..,s\} of the edges and vertices of GG giving distinct weighted degrees wtG(v):=w(v)+veE(G)w(e)wt_G(v):=w(v)+\sum_{v\in e \in E(G)}w(e) for every pair of vertices of GG. We prove that tvs(F)=(n1+1)/2tvs(F)=\lceil (n_1+1)/2 \rceil for every forest FF with no vertices of degree 2 and no isolated vertices, where n1n_1 is the number of pendant vertices in FF. Stronger results for trees were recently proved by Nurdin et al.Comment: The stronger results for trees were recently proved by Nurdin et al. (Nurdin, Baskoro E.T., Salman A.N.M., Gaos N.N., On the Total Vertex Irregularity Strength of Trees, Discrete Mathematics 310 (2010), 3043-3048.). However we decided to publish our paper for two reasons. Firstly, we consider more general case of forests, not only trees. Secondly, we use different proof techniqu

    On the neighbour sum distinguishing index of planar graphs

    Full text link
    Let cc be a proper edge colouring of a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) with integers 1,2,,k1,2,\ldots,k. Then kΔ(G)k\geq \Delta(G), while by Vizing's theorem, no more than k=Δ(G)+1k=\Delta(G)+1 is necessary for constructing such cc. On the course of investigating irregularities in graphs, it has been moreover conjectured that only slightly larger kk, i.e., k=Δ(G)+2k=\Delta(G)+2 enables enforcing additional strong feature of cc, namely that it attributes distinct sums of incident colours to adjacent vertices in GG if only this graph has no isolated edges and is not isomorphic to C5C_5. We prove the conjecture is valid for planar graphs of sufficiently large maximum degree. In fact even stronger statement holds, as the necessary number of colours stemming from the result of Vizing is proved to be sufficient for this family of graphs. Specifically, our main result states that every planar graph GG of maximum degree at least 2828 which contains no isolated edges admits a proper edge colouring c:E{1,2,,Δ(G)+1}c:E\to\{1,2,\ldots,\Delta(G)+1\} such that euc(e)evc(e)\sum_{e\ni u}c(e)\neq \sum_{e\ni v}c(e) for every edge uvuv of GG.Comment: 22 page

    Group twin coloring of graphs

    Full text link
    For a given graph GG, the least integer k2k\geq 2 such that for every Abelian group G\mathcal{G} of order kk there exists a proper edge labeling f:E(G)Gf:E(G)\rightarrow \mathcal{G} so that xN(u)f(xu)xN(v)f(xv)\sum_{x\in N(u)}f(xu)\neq \sum_{x\in N(v)}f(xv) for each edge uvE(G)uv\in E(G) is called the \textit{group twin chromatic index} of GG and denoted by χg(G)\chi'_g(G). This graph invariant is related to a few well-known problems in the field of neighbor distinguishing graph colorings. We conjecture that χg(G)Δ(G)+3\chi'_g(G)\leq \Delta(G)+3 for all graphs without isolated edges, where Δ(G)\Delta(G) is the maximum degree of GG, and provide an infinite family of connected graph (trees) for which the equality holds. We prove that this conjecture is valid for all trees, and then apply this result as the base case for proving a general upper bound for all graphs GG without isolated edges: χg(G)2(Δ(G)+col(G))5\chi'_g(G)\leq 2(\Delta(G)+{\rm col}(G))-5, where col(G){\rm col}(G) denotes the coloring number of GG. This improves the best known upper bound known previously only for the case of cyclic groups Zk\mathbb{Z}_k

    New results on eigenvalues and degree deviation

    Full text link
    Let GG be a graph. In a famous paper Collatz and Sinogowitz had proposed to measure its deviation from regularity by the difference of the (adjacency) spectral radius and the average degree: ϵ(G)=ρ(G)2mn\epsilon(G)=\rho(G)-\frac{2m}{n}. We obtain here a new upper bound on ϵ(G)\epsilon(G) which seems to consistently outperform the best known upper bound to date, due to Nikiforov. The method of proof may also be of independent interest, as we use notions from numerical analysis to re-cast the estimation of ϵ(G)\epsilon(G) as a special case of the estimation of the difference between Rayleigh quotients of proximal vectors
    corecore