Survey of Rough and Fuzzy Hybridization

In this research existing barriers and the influence of product’s functional lifecycle on the adoption of circular revenue models in the civil and non-residential building sector was investigated. A revenue model, i.e. how revenues are generated in a business model, becomes circular if it is used to extend producer responsibility to create financial incentives for producers to benefit from making their product more circular. For example, leasing or a buy-back scheme in theory creates an incentive for producers to, amongst others, make the product last longer, to be maintained more easily and to be returned. In the Dutch national policy documents there is a call for the development of circular revenue models to extend producer responsibility in the construction sector, as the construction sector is highlighted as a key sector in terms of environmental impact. Adopting circular revenue models in the construction has so far not been research, however expectations about barriers towards adopting circular revenue models can be derived from related literature. The civil and non-residential building sub-sector of the construction sector is of special interest as this subsector has specific characteristics that were expected to create barriers towards adopting circular revenue models: ownership rights and the long functional lifecycle of products (e.g. buildings). This led to the main research question: “What are the barriers to the adoption of circular revenue models in the civil- and non-residential building sector?” The long functional lifecycle of buildings is of special interest as literature suggests that buildings are made from products with different functional lifecycles. This led to led to an additional sub question: “What is the influence of product’s functional lifecycle on the adoption of circular revenue models in the civil and non-residential building sector?” To answer both research questions, the research was split up into three phases. First, semi-structured interviews were held with practitioners, e.g. companies that have adopted, or are working on adopting, circular revenue models. Based upon the results, a second round of interviews was held with experts to better understand the barriers and gather more in-depth insights. The topics chosen for this round were based on the results from the practitioners. The third research phase was a focus group session held primarily with respondents from the expert and practitioner interviews. During the focus group preliminary results were presented and several topics were discussed. During this research 25 barriers, such as a maximum duration for contracts, short-term thinking and the adoption of measurement methods, towards adopting circular revenue models in the civil and non-residential building sector were found, which fit under five main categories in order of importance: financial, sector-specific, regulatory, organisational and technical barriers. Furthermore, seven additional barriers were found when adopting circular revenue models in which producers retain ownership. This shows that there are many barriers that hinder the adoption of circular revenue models in the civil and non-residential building sector, especially when adopting circular revenue models where producers retain ownership. Furthermore, during this research it was found that the shorter the functional lifecycle of building layers, the more easy the adoption of circular revenue models becomes, because, amongst others, financing for longer that 15 years is difficult and two parties to not like to be mutually dependents upon each other over long time periods. In increasing order of difficulty circular revenue models can be adopted to the building layers with longer functional lifecycles: space plan, services, skin and structure. During the research a consensus amongst respondents was identified that circular revenue models should not be adopted to the structure, as the functional lifecycle was too long. In addition to the functional lifecycle, four additional variables were identified that emphasise why the adoption of circular revenue models to building layers with shorter functional lifecycles is more interesting: ratio CAPEX/OPEX, flexibility of products, focus on investor or user and complexity of products

Fuzzy-rough set and fuzzy ID3 decision approaches to knowledge discovery in datasets

Fuzzy rough sets are the generalization of traditional rough sets to deal with both fuzziness and vagueness in data. The existing researches on fuzzy rough sets mainly concentrate on the construction of approximation operators. Less effort has been put on the knowledge discovery in datasets with fuzzy rough sets. This paper mainly focuses on knowledge discovery in datasets with fuzzy rough sets. After analyzing the previous works on knowledge discovery with fuzzy rough sets, we introduce formal concepts of attribute reduction with fuzzy rough sets and completely study the structure of attribute reduction

An overview of decision table literature 1982-1995.

This report gives an overview of the literature on decision tables over the past 15 years. As much as possible, for each reference, an author supplied abstract, a number of keywords and a classification are provided. In some cases own comments are added. The purpose of these comments is to show where, how and why decision tables are used. The literature is classified according to application area, theoretical versus practical character, year of publication, country or origin (not necessarily country of publication) and the language of the document. After a description of the scope of the interview, classification results and the classification by topic are presented. The main body of the paper is the ordered list of publications with abstract, classification and comments.

Rough set and rule-based multicriteria decision aiding

The aim of multicriteria decision aiding is to give the decision maker a recommendation concerning a set of objects evaluated from multiple points of view called criteria. Since a rational decision maker acts with respect to his/her value system, in order to recommend the most-preferred decision, one must identify decision maker's preferences. In this paper, we focus on preference discovery from data concerning some past decisions of the decision maker. We consider the preference model in the form of a set of "if..., then..." decision rules discovered from the data by inductive learning. To structure the data prior to induction of rules, we use the Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (DRSA). DRSA is a methodology for reasoning about data, which handles ordinal evaluations of objects on considered criteria and monotonic relationships between these evaluations and the decision. We review applications of DRSA to a large variety of multicriteria decision problems

Weighted logics for artificial intelligence : an introductory discussion

International audienceBefore presenting the contents of the special issue, we propose a structured introductory overview of a landscape of the weighted logics (in a general sense) that can be found in the Artificial Intelligence literature, highlighting their fundamental differences and their application areas