75,004 research outputs found
Shape Interaction Matrix Revisited and Robustified: Efficient Subspace Clustering with Corrupted and Incomplete Data
The Shape Interaction Matrix (SIM) is one of the earliest approaches to
performing subspace clustering (i.e., separating points drawn from a union of
subspaces). In this paper, we revisit the SIM and reveal its connections to
several recent subspace clustering methods. Our analysis lets us derive a
simple, yet effective algorithm to robustify the SIM and make it applicable to
realistic scenarios where the data is corrupted by noise. We justify our method
by intuitive examples and the matrix perturbation theory. We then show how this
approach can be extended to handle missing data, thus yielding an efficient and
general subspace clustering algorithm. We demonstrate the benefits of our
approach over state-of-the-art subspace clustering methods on several
challenging motion segmentation and face clustering problems, where the data
includes corrupted and missing measurements.Comment: This is an extended version of our iccv15 pape
Community Detection via Maximization of Modularity and Its Variants
In this paper, we first discuss the definition of modularity (Q) used as a
metric for community quality and then we review the modularity maximization
approaches which were used for community detection in the last decade. Then, we
discuss two opposite yet coexisting problems of modularity optimization: in
some cases, it tends to favor small communities over large ones while in
others, large communities over small ones (so called the resolution limit
problem). Next, we overview several community quality metrics proposed to solve
the resolution limit problem and discuss Modularity Density (Qds) which
simultaneously avoids the two problems of modularity. Finally, we introduce two
novel fine-tuned community detection algorithms that iteratively attempt to
improve the community quality measurements by splitting and merging the given
network community structure. The first of them, referred to as Fine-tuned Q, is
based on modularity (Q) while the second one is based on Modularity Density
(Qds) and denoted as Fine-tuned Qds. Then, we compare the greedy algorithm of
modularity maximization (denoted as Greedy Q), Fine-tuned Q, and Fine-tuned Qds
on four real networks, and also on the classical clique network and the LFR
benchmark networks, each of which is instantiated by a wide range of
parameters. The results indicate that Fine-tuned Qds is the most effective
among the three algorithms discussed. Moreover, we show that Fine-tuned Qds can
be applied to the communities detected by other algorithms to significantly
improve their results
- …