A methodology for the generation of efficient error detection mechanisms

A dependable software system must contain error detection mechanisms and error recovery mechanisms. Software components for the detection of errors are typically designed based on a system specification or the experience of software engineers, with their efficiency typically being measured using fault injection and metrics such as coverage and latency. In this paper, we introduce a methodology for the design of highly efficient error detection mechanisms. The proposed methodology combines fault injection analysis and data mining techniques in order to generate predicates for efficient error detection mechanisms. The results presented demonstrate the viability of the methodology as an approach for the development of efficient error detection mechanisms, as the predicates generated yield a true positive rate of almost 100% and a false positive rate very close to 0% for the detection of failure-inducing states. The main advantage of the proposed methodology over current state-of-the-art approaches is that efficient detectors are obtained by design, rather than by using specification-based detector design or the experience of software engineers

Model-based dependability analysis : state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook

Abstract: Over the past two decades, the study of model-based dependability analysis has gathered significant research interest. Different approaches have been developed to automate and address various limitations of classical dependability techniques to contend with the increasing complexity and challenges of modern safety-critical system. Two leading paradigms have emerged, one which constructs predictive system failure models from component failure models compositionally using the topology of the system. The other utilizes design models - typically state automata - to explore system behaviour through fault injection. This paper reviews a number of prominent techniques under these two paradigms, and provides an insight into their working mechanism, applicability, strengths and challenges, as well as recent developments within these fields. We also discuss the emerging trends on integrated approaches and advanced analysis capabilities. Lastly, we outline the future outlook for model-based dependability analysis

The Art of Fault Injection

Classical greek philosopher considered the foremost virtues to be temperance, justice, courage, and prudence. In this paper we relate these cardinal virtues to the correct methodological approaches that researchers should follow when setting up a fault injection experiment. With this work we try to understand where the "straightforward pathway" lies, in order to highlight those common methodological errors that deeply influence the coherency and the meaningfulness of fault injection experiments. Fault injection is like an art, where the success of the experiments depends on a very delicate balance between modeling, creativity, statistics, and patience

On minimising the maximum expected verification time

Cyber Physical Systems (CPSs) consist of hardware and software components. To verify that the whole (i.e., software + hardware) system meets the given specifications, exhaustive simulation-based approaches (Hardware In the Loop Simulation, HILS) can be effectively used by first generating all relevant simulation scenarios (i.e., sequences of disturbances) and then actually simulating all of them (verification phase). When considering the whole verification activity, we see that the above mentioned verification phase is repeated until no error is found. Accordingly, in order to minimise the time taken by the whole verification activity, in each verification phase we should, ideally, start by simulating scenarios witnessing errors (counterexamples). Of course, to know beforehand the set of such scenarios is not feasible. In this paper we show how to select scenarios so as to minimise the Worst Case Expected Verification Tim

Systematic Model-based Design Assurance and Property-based Fault Injection for Safety Critical Digital Systems

With advances in sensing, wireless communications, computing, control, and automation technologies, we are witnessing the rapid uptake of Cyber-Physical Systems across many applications including connected vehicles, healthcare, energy, manufacturing, smart homes etc. Many of these applications are safety-critical in nature and they depend on the correct and safe execution of software and hardware that are intrinsically subject to faults. These faults can be design faults (Software Faults, Specification faults, etc.) or physically occurring faults (hardware failures, Single-event-upsets, etc.). Both types of faults must be addressed during the design and development of these critical systems. Several safety-critical industries have widely adopted Model-Based Engineering paradigms to manage the design assurance processes of these complex CPSs. This thesis studies the application of IEC 61508 compliant model-based design assurance methodology on a representative safety-critical digital architecture targeted for the Nuclear power generation facilities. The study presents detailed experiences and results to demonstrate the benefits of Model testing in finding design flaws and its relevance to subsequent verification steps in the workflow. Additionally, to study the impact of physical faults on the digital architecture we develop a novel property-based fault injection method that overcomes few deficiencies of traditional fault injection methods. The model-based fault injection approach presented here guarantees high efficiency and near-exhaustive input/state/fault space coverage, by utilizing formal model checking principles to identify fault activation conditions and prove the fault tolerance features. The fault injection framework facilitates automated integration of fault saboteurs throughout the model to enable exhaustive fault location coverage in the model

Quality and Quantity in Robustness-Checking Using Formal Techniques

Fault tolerance is one of the main challenges for future technology scaling to tolerate transient faults. Various techniques at design level are available to catch and handle transient faults, e.g., Triple Modular Redundancy. An important but missing step is to verify the implementation of those techniques since the implementation might be buggy itself. The thesis is focusing on formally verifying digital circuits with respect to fault-tolerant aspects. It considers transient faults and basically checks whether these faults can influence the output behavior of sequential circuits for any kind of scenarios. As a result the designer is pin-pointed directly to critical parts of the design and gets a prove about the absence of faulty behavior for non-critical parts. The focus of the verification is completeness with respect to the analysis. Three issues need to be adequately addressed: 1) cover all input stimuli, 2) all possible transient faults, and, 3) all possibly exponential long (wrt. to number of state bits) propagation paths. All three issues are addressed in different engines. A tool called RobuCheck has been implemented and evaluated on different academic benchmarks from ITC'99 and industrial benchmarks from IBM

Fast and accurate SER estimation for large combinational blocks in early stages of the design

Soft Error Rate (SER) estimation is an important challenge for integrated circuits because of the increased vulnerability brought by technology scaling. This paper presents a methodology to estimate in early stages of the design the susceptibility of combinational circuits to particle strikes. In the core of the framework lies MASkIt , a novel approach that combines signal probabilities with technology characterization to swiftly compute the logical, electrical, and timing masking effects of the circuit under study taking into account all input combinations and pulse widths at once. Signal probabilities are estimated applying a new hybrid approach that integrates heuristics along with selective simulation of reconvergent subnetworks. The experimental results validate our proposed technique, showing a speedup of two orders of magnitude in comparison with traditional fault injection estimation with an average estimation error of 5 percent. Finally, we analyze the vulnerability of the Decoder, Scheduler, ALU, and FPU of an out-of-order, superscalar processor design.This work has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and Feder Funds under grant TIN2013-44375-R, by the Generalitat de Catalunya under grant FI-DGR 2016, and by the FP7 program of the EU under contract FP7-611404 (CLERECO).Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft