937 research outputs found
The non-unique Universe
The purpose of this paper is to elucidate, by means of concepts and theorems
drawn from mathematical logic, the conditions under which the existence of a
multiverse is a logical necessity in mathematical physics, and the implications
of Godel's incompleteness theorem for theories of everything.
Three conclusions are obtained in the final section: (i) the theory of the
structure of our universe might be an undecidable theory, and this constitutes
a potential epistemological limit for mathematical physics, but because such a
theory must be complete, there is no ontological barrier to the existence of a
final theory of everything; (ii) in terms of mathematical logic, there are two
different types of multiverse: classes of non-isomorphic but elementarily
equivalent models, and classes of model which are both non-isomorphic and
elementarily inequivalent; (iii) for a hypothetical theory of everything to
have only one possible model, and to thereby negate the possible existence of a
multiverse, that theory must be such that it admits only a finite model
Dependent choice, properness, and generic absoluteness
We show that Dependent Choice is a sufficient choice principle for developing the basic theory of proper forcing, and for deriving generic absoluteness for the Chang model in the presence of large cardinals, even with respect to -preserving symmetric submodels of forcing extensions. Hence, not only provides the right framework for developing classical analysis, but is also the right base theory over which to safeguard truth in analysis from the independence phenomenon in the presence of large cardinals. We also investigate some basic consequences of the Proper Forcing Axiom in, and formulate a natural question about the generic absoluteness of the Proper Forcing Axiom in and. Our results confirm as a natural foundation for a significant portion of classical mathematics and provide support to the idea of this theory being also a natural foundation for a large part of set theory
Is the dream solution to the continuum hypothesis attainable?
The dream solution of the continuum hypothesis (CH) would be a solution by
which we settle the continuum hypothesis on the basis of a newly discovered
fundamental principle of set theory, a missing axiom, widely regarded as true.
Such a dream solution would indeed be a solution, since we would all accept the
new axiom along with its consequences. In this article, however, I argue that
such a dream solution to CH is unattainable.
The article is adapted from and expands upon material in my article, "The
set-theoretic multiverse", to appear in the Review of Symbolic Logic (see
arXiv:1108.4223).Comment: This article is based upon an argument I gave during the course of a
three-lecture tutorial on set-theoretic geology at the summer school "Set
Theory and Higher-Order Logic: Foundational Issues and Mathematical
Developments", at the University of London, Birkbeck in August 201
Possible physical universes
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the various types of physical
universe which could exist according to modern mathematical physics. The paper
begins with an introduction that approaches the question from the viewpoint of
ontic structural realism. Section 2 takes the case of the 'multiverse' of
spatially homogeneous universes, and analyses the famous Collins-Hawking
argument, which purports to show that our own universe is a very special member
of this collection. Section 3 considers the multiverse of all solutions to the
Einstein field equations, and continues the discussion of whether the notions
of special and typical can be defined within such a collection
- …