A National Dialogue on Health Information Technology and Privacy

Increasingly, government leaders recognize that solving the complex problems facing America today will require more than simply keeping citizens informed. Meeting challenges like rising health care costs, climate change and energy independence requires increased level of collaboration. Traditionally, government agencies have operated in silos -- separated not only from citizens, but from each other, as well. Nevertheless, some have begun to reach across and outside of government to access the collective brainpower of organizations, stakeholders and individuals.The National Dialogue on Health Information Technology and Privacy was one such initiative. It was conceived by leaders in government who sought to demonstrate that it is not only possible, but beneficial and economical, to engage openly and broadly on an issue that is both national in scope and deeply relevant to the everyday lives of citizens. The results of this first-of-its-kind online event are captured in this report, together with important lessons learned along the way.This report served as a call to action. On his first full day in office, President Obama put government on notice that this new, more collaborative model can no longer be confined to the efforts of early adopters. He called upon every executive department and agency to "harness new technology" and make government "transparent, participatory, and collaborative." Government is quickly transitioning to a new generation of managers and leaders, for whom online collaboration is not a new frontier but a fact of everyday life. We owe it to them -- and the citizens we serve -- to recognize and embrace the myriad tools available to fulfill the promise of good government in the 21st Century.Key FindingsThe Panel recommended that the Administration give stakeholders the opportunity to further participate in the discussion of heath IT and privacy through broader outreach and by helping the public to understand the value of a person-centered view of healthcare information technology

Management: A continuing bibliography with indexes

This biliography lists 919 reports, articles, and other documents introduced into the NASA scientific and technical information system in 1981

Robustness of Multiple Objective Decision Analysis Preference Functions

This research investigated value and utility functions in multiobjective decision analysis to examine the relationship between them in a military decision making context. The impact of these differences was examined to improve implementation efficiency. The robustness of the decision model was examined with respect to the preference functions to reduce the time burden imposed on the decision maker. Data for decision making in a military context supports the distinction between value and utility functions. Relationships between value and utility functions and risk attitudes were found to be complex. Elicitation error was significantly smaller than the difference between value and utility functions. Risk attitudes were generally neither constant across the domain of the evaluation measure nor consistent between evaluation measures. An improved measure of differences between preference functions, the weighted root means square, is introduced and a goodness of fit criterion established. An improved measure of risk attitudes employing utility functions is developed. Response Surface Methodology was applied to improve the efficiency of decision analysis utility model applications through establishing the robustness of decision models to the preference functions. An algorithm was developed and employs this information to provide a hybrid value-utility model that offers increased elicitation efficiency

TOWARDS BETTER OUTCOMES FOR FAMILIES WITH TRANSITION-AGE YOUTH OR YOUNG ADULTS WITH ASD: A MIXED METHODS STUDY FROM A PARENT’S PERSPECTIVE

The after-high-school outcomes for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their families are less than desirable. The current study employed an exploratory sequential mixed methods design in order to enhance understanding of the family adaptation process during transition. First, a qualitative study was conducted in order to understand the stressors, external and internal support, coping strategies, and family adaptation outcomes during transition, from a parent’s perspective, using the ABCX model. Thirteen parents of adolescents and young adults with ASD were interviewed. These parents reported a continually high level of stress due to normative strains and ASD-related demands. They clearly described the tangible, emotional, informational, and internal resources both received and needed. Parents, as active agents in their children’s lives, have their own views towards transition, philosophy, and ways of coping. Even though many of them reported negative experiences, these parents also found new meanings and happiness in their lives. Based on the literature review and the qualitative results, a quantitative study was then developed, which applied the ABCX model to understand the predictors of good parent transition outcomes and investigate the mediating mechanism between stressors and parent transition outcomes. At the indicator level, autism severity, mental health crisis/challenging behaviors, filial obligation, general social support, transition planning quality, parent-teacher alliance, parenting efficacy, problem-focused coping, avoidance-focused coping, and optimism were important predictors of the four benchmarks of parents’ outcomes (i.e., parents’ burden, parents’ transition experience, parents’ subjective health, and family quality of life). At the structural level, optimism, emotion-coping strategies, and resources mediated the relationships between stressors and parents’ outcomes. Research and practical applications are discussed. Findings across the two studies led to identification of key factors that influence the outcomes of parents of adolescents and young adults with ASD, as well as an understanding of the complex relationships among the predictors. The results build upon existing empirical and theoretical work related to the transition of families of adolescents and young adults with ASD. Recommendations for future research and clinical practices are discussed

Methodological aspects of a decision aid for transportation choices under uncertainty

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil Engineering, 1982.MICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ENGINEERING.Bibliography: leaves 253-266.by Hani Sobhi Mahmassani.Ph.D

An analysis of judgemental bias in housing choice

Buying a home is among the most important choices that any individual is likely to make in their lifetime. It has lasting consequences for happiness, well-being and personal finances. Yet, given the infrequency with which such decisions are made; the difficulty getting information from an opaque and decentralised marketplace; and the high transactions costs involved, there is a significant risk that decision making may depart from the high standard imposed by the normative economic concept of 'rational choice'. This thesis uses the insights of the economic theory of choice - from behavioural economics in particular - to examine housing choice from a new perspective. It considers the potential for estate agents, knowingly or otherwise, to exploit behavioural biases in decision making to influence preference and, ultimately, choices over housing. This naturally is of interest to estate agents and policy makers involved in housing markets; but most importantly to individuals as decision makers: making better decisions relies on understanding when and where vulnerability to manipulation may lie. Using evidence from a series of classroom experiments with 280 student volunteers and from two online surveys with over 4,000 adult respondents, significant areas where individuals may be consistently vulnerable to manipulation of judgement are found and recorded. In particular, both student and adult respondents are susceptible to biases involving manipulation of the decision making context, known as the choice frame. Students also tend to rely on arbitrary `anchor' points to make value estimates, which results in significantly impaired judgements, even in the presence of incentives for accuracy. Finally, evidence of a significant new form of behavioural bias is found, in which elements of the choice frame have an unexpectedly negative impact on perceptions. This new bias is persistent across several experimental scenarios and is labelled the 'choice pollution effect'

Central Washington University Undergraduate/Graduate Catalog 2005-2006

https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/catalogs/1275/thumbnail.jp