Object-Based Supervised Machine Learning Regional-Scale Land-Cover Classification Using High Resolution Remotely Sensed Data

High spatial resolution (HR) (1m – 5m) remotely sensed data in conjunction with supervised machine learning classification are commonly used to construct land-cover classifications. Despite the increasing availability of HR data, most studies investigating HR remotely sensed data and associated classification methods employ relatively small study areas. This work therefore drew on a 2,609 km2, regional-scale study in northeastern West Virginia, USA, to investigates a number of core aspects of HR land-cover supervised classification using machine learning. Issues explored include training sample selection, cross-validation parameter tuning, the choice of machine learning algorithm, training sample set size, and feature selection. A geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) approach was used. The data comprised National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) orthoimagery and LIDAR-derived rasters. Stratified-statistical-based training sampling methods were found to generate higher classification accuracies than deliberative-based sampling. Subset-based sampling, in which training data is collected from a small geographic subset area within the study site, did not notably decrease the classification accuracy. For the five machine learning algorithms investigated, support vector machines (SVM), random forests (RF), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), single-layer perceptron neural networks (NEU), and learning vector quantization (LVQ), increasing the size of the training set typically improved the overall accuracy of the classification. However, RF was consistently more accurate than the other four machine learning algorithms, even when trained from a relatively small training sample set. Recursive feature elimination (RFE), which can be used to reduce the dimensionality of a training set, was found to increase the overall accuracy of both SVM and NEU classification, however the improvement in overall accuracy diminished as sample size increased. RFE resulted in only a small improvement the overall accuracy of RF classification, indicating that RF is generally insensitive to the Hughes Phenomenon. Nevertheless, as feature selection is an optional step in the classification process, and can be discarded if it has a negative effect on classification accuracy, it should be investigated as part of best practice for supervised machine land-cover classification using remotely sensed data

A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: Theories, Tools and Challenges for the Community

In recent years, deep learning (DL), a re-branding of neural networks (NNs), has risen to the top in numerous areas, namely computer vision (CV), speech recognition, natural language processing, etc. Whereas remote sensing (RS) possesses a number of unique challenges, primarily related to sensors and applications, inevitably RS draws from many of the same theories as CV; e.g., statistics, fusion, and machine learning, to name a few. This means that the RS community should be aware of, if not at the leading edge of, of advancements like DL. Herein, we provide the most comprehensive survey of state-of-the-art RS DL research. We also review recent new developments in the DL field that can be used in DL for RS. Namely, we focus on theories, tools and challenges for the RS community. Specifically, we focus on unsolved challenges and opportunities as it relates to (i) inadequate data sets, (ii) human-understandable solutions for modelling physical phenomena, (iii) Big Data, (iv) non-traditional heterogeneous data sources, (v) DL architectures and learning algorithms for spectral, spatial and temporal data, (vi) transfer learning, (vii) an improved theoretical understanding of DL systems, (viii) high barriers to entry, and (ix) training and optimizing the DL.Comment: 64 pages, 411 references. To appear in Journal of Applied Remote Sensin

Mapping urban tree species in a tropical environment using airborne multispectral and LiDAR data

Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geospatial TechnologiesAccurate and up-to-date urban tree inventory is an essential resource for the development of strategies towards sustainable urban planning, as well as for effective management and preservation of biodiversity. Trees contribute to thermal comfort within urban centers by lessening heat island effect and have a direct impact in the reduction of air pollution. However, mapping individual trees species normally involves time-consuming field work over large areas or image interpretation performed by specialists. The integration of airborne LiDAR data with high-spatial resolution and multispectral aerial image is an alternative and effective approach to differentiate tree species at the individual crown level. This thesis aims to investigate the potential of such remotely sensed data to discriminate 5 common urban tree species using traditional Machine Learning classifiers (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and k-Nearest Neighbors) in the tropical environment of Salvador, Brazil. Vegetation indices and texture information were extracted from multispectral imagery, and LiDAR-derived variables for tree crowns, were tested separately and combined to perform tree species classification applying three different classifiers. Random Forest outperformed the other two classifiers, reaching overall accuracy of 82.5% when using combined multispectral and LiDAR data. The results indicate that (1) given the similarity in spectral signature, multispectral data alone is not sufficient to distinguish tropical tree species (only k-NN classifier could detect all species); (2) height values and intensity of crown returns points were the most relevant LiDAR features, combination of both datasets improved accuracy up to 20%; (3) generation of canopy height model derived from LiDAR point cloud is an effective method to delineate individual tree crowns in a semi-automatic approach

Effects of Training Set Size on Supervised Machine-Learning Land-Cover Classification of Large-Area High-Resolution Remotely Sensed Data

The size of the training data set is a major determinant of classification accuracy. Neverthe- less, the collection of a large training data set for supervised classifiers can be a challenge, especially for studies covering a large area, which may be typical of many real-world applied projects. This work investigates how variations in training set size, ranging from a large sample size (n = 10,000) to a very small sample size (n = 40), affect the performance of six supervised machine-learning algo- rithms applied to classify large-area high-spatial-resolution (HR) (1–5 m) remotely sensed data within the context of a geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) approach. GEOBIA, in which adjacent similar pixels are grouped into image-objects that form the unit of the classification, offers the potential benefit of allowing multiple additional variables, such as measures of object geometry and texture, thus increasing the dimensionality of the classification input data. The six supervised machine-learning algorithms are support vector machines (SVM), random forests (RF), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), single-layer perceptron neural networks (NEU), learning vector quantization (LVQ), and gradient-boosted trees (GBM). RF, the algorithm with the highest overall accuracy, was notable for its negligible decrease in overall accuracy, 1.0%, when training sample size decreased from 10,000 to 315 samples. GBM provided similar overall accuracy to RF; however, the algorithm was very expensive in terms of training time and computational resources, especially with large training sets. In contrast to RF and GBM, NEU, and SVM were particularly sensitive to decreasing sample size, with NEU classifications generally producing overall accuracies that were on average slightly higher than SVM classifications for larger sample sizes, but lower than SVM for the smallest sample sizes. NEU however required a longer processing time. The k-NN classifier saw less of a drop in overall accuracy than NEU and SVM as training set size decreased; however, the overall accuracies of k-NN were typically less than RF, NEU, and SVM classifiers. LVQ generally had the lowest overall accuracy of all six methods, but was relatively insensitive to sample size, down to the smallest sample sizes. Overall, due to its relatively high accuracy with small training sample sets, and minimal variations in overall accuracy between very large and small sample sets, as well as relatively short processing time, RF was a good classifier for large-area land-cover classifications of HR remotely sensed data, especially when training data are scarce. However, as performance of different supervised classifiers varies in response to training set size, investigating multiple classification algorithms is recommended to achieve optimal accuracy for a project