535 research outputs found

    Proceedings of the International Micro Air Vehicles Conference and Flight Competition 2017 (IMAV 2017)

    Get PDF
    The IMAV 2017 conference has been held at ISAE-SUPAERO, Toulouse, France from Sept. 18 to Sept. 21, 2017. More than 250 participants coming from 30 different countries worldwide have presented their latest research activities in the field of drones. 38 papers have been presented during the conference including various topics such as Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics, Propulsion, Autopilots, Sensors, Communication systems, Mission planning techniques, Artificial Intelligence, Human-machine cooperation as applied to drones

    Aerial Vehicles

    Get PDF
    This book contains 35 chapters written by experts in developing techniques for making aerial vehicles more intelligent, more reliable, more flexible in use, and safer in operation.It will also serve as an inspiration for further improvement of the design and application of aeral vehicles. The advanced techniques and research described here may also be applicable to other high-tech areas such as robotics, avionics, vetronics, and space

    CONTENTS

    Get PDF

    Low Speed Flap-bounding in Ornithopters and its Inspiration on the Energy Efficient Flight of Quadrotors

    Get PDF
    Flap-bounding, a form of intermittent flight, is often exhibited by small birds over their entire range of flight speeds. The purpose of flap-bounding is unclear during low to medium speed (2 - 8 m/s) flight from a mechanical-power perspective: aerodynamic models suggest continuous flapping would require less power output and lower cost of transport. This thesis works towards the understanding of the advantages of flap-bounding and tries to employ the underlining principle to design quadrotor maneuver to improve power efficiency. To explore the functional significance of flap-bounding at low speeds, I measured body trajectory and kinematics of wings and tail of zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata, N=2) during flights in a laboratory between two perches. The flights consist of three phases: initial, descending and ascending. Zebra finch first accelerated using continuous flapping, then descended, featuring intermittent bounds. The flight was completed by ascending using nearly-continuous flapping. When exiting bounds in descending phase, they achieved higher than pre-bound forward velocity by swinging body forward similar to pendulum motion with conserved mechanical energy. Takeoffs of black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus, N=3) in the wild was recorded and I found similar kinematics. Our modeling of power output indicates finch achieves higher velocity (13%) with lower cost of transport (9%) when descending, compared with continuous flapping in previously-studied pigeons. To apply the findings to the design of quadrotor motion, a mimicking maneuver was developed that consisted of five phases: projectile drop, drop transition, pendulum swing, rise transition and projectile rise. The quadrotor outputs small amount (4 N) of thrust during projectile drop phase and ramps up the thrust while increasing body pitch angle during the drop transition phase until the thrust enables the quadrotor to advance in pendulum-like motion in the pendulum swing phase. As the quadrotor reaches the symmetric point with respect to the vertical axis of the pendulum motion, it engages in reducing the thrust and pitch angle during the rise transition phase until the thrust is lowered to the same level as the beginning of the maneuver and the body angle of attack minimized (0.2 deg) in the projectile rise phase. The trajectory of the maneuver was optimized to yield minimum cost of transport. The quadrotor moves forward by tracking the cycle of the optimized trajectory repeatedly. Due to the aggressive nature of the maneuver, we developed new algorithms using onboard sensors to determine the estimated position and attitude. By employing nonlinear controller, we showed that cost of transport of the flap-bounding inspired maneuver is lower (28%) than conventional constant forward flight, which makes it the preferable strategy in high speed flight (โ‰ฅ15 m/s)

    Reinforcement Learning to Control Lift Coefficient Using Distributed Sensors on a Wind Tunnel Model

    Get PDF
    Arrays of sensors distributed on the wing of fixed-wing vehicles can provide information not directly available to conventional sensor suites. These arrays of sensors have the potential to improve flight control and overall flight performance of small fixed-wing uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs). This work investigated the feasibility of estimating and controlling aerodynamic coefficients using the experimental readings of distributed pressure and strain sensors across a wing. The study was performed on a one degree-of-freedom model about pitch of a fixed-wing platform instrumented with the distributed sensing system. A series of reinforcement learning (RL) agents were trained in simulation for lift coefficient control, then validated in wind tunnel experiments. The performance of RL-based controllers with different sets of inputs in the observation space were compared with each other and with that of a manually tuned PID controller. Results showed that hybrid RL agents that used both distributed sensing data and conventional sensors performed best across the different tests.</p

    ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ๋‚ ๊ฐœ ์—†๋Š” ๋‚ ๊ฐฏ์ง“ ์ดˆ์†Œํ˜• ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์˜ ์ž์„ธ์กฐ์ ˆ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2020. 8. ๊น€ํ˜„์ง„.์ตœ๊ทผ ์ƒ์ฒด๋ชจ๋ฐฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์ด ์ปค์ง€๋ฉด์„œ ์ƒ๋ช…์ฒด์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์™ธํ˜•, ์›€์ง์ž„, ํ–‰๋™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทธ๋“ค์˜ ์žฅ์ ์„ ๋กœ๋ด‡์— ์ ์šฉ์‹œ์ผœ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํŠน๋ณ„ํ•œ ์ž„๋ฌด๋ฅผ ์ข€ ๋” ํšจ๊ณผ, ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋Š˜์–ด๋‚˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹œ๋„๋Š” ๋ฌด์ธ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์—๋„ ์ ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋‚ ๊ฐฏ์ง“ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ด์— ํ•ด๋‹น๋œ๋‹ค. ๋‚ ๊ฐœ์ง“ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด๋Š” ๋‚ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์šด๋™์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํž˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋น„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด๋กœ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ๋‚ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์œ ๋ฌด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ƒˆ๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋ฐฉํ•œ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด(๋ฏธ์ตํ˜• ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด)์™€ ๊ณค์ถฉ์„ ๋ชจ๋ฐฉํ•œ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด(๋ฌด๋ฏธ์ตํ˜• ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด)๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด๋ฏธ์ตํ˜• ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ œ์ž๋ฆฌ ๋น„ํ–‰์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ž‘๊ณ  ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋ฒผ์›Œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ์ €ํ•ญ๋„ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋‚ ๋ ตํ•œ ๋น„ํ–‰์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ์žฅ์ ์ด ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ˆ˜๋™ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ œ์–ด๋ฉด์ด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์ถ”๋ ฅ ์ƒ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋™์‹œ์— 3์ถ•์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์ œ์–ด ๋ชจ๋ฉ˜ํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋งค์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ํŠน์ง•์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ €์ž์˜ ๋ฏธ์ตํ˜• ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ์ž์œจ ๋น„ํ–‰์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฌด๋ฏธ์ตํ˜• ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค๊ณผ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ €์ž๋Š” ์‹œ์ค‘์—์„œ ํŒ๋งค๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” RC์žฅ๋‚œ๊ฐ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•ด 30 gram ์ดํ•˜์˜ ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  30cm3 ์ด๋‚ด์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ๋ฌด๋ฏธ์ตํ˜• ๋‚ ๊ฐฏ์ง“ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด ๋‚ด๋ถ€์—๋Š” ๊ตฌ๋™๊ธฐ๋กœ DC ๋ชจํ„ฐ์™€ ์„œ๋ณด๋ชจํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ, DC ๋ชจํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋‚ ๊ฐฏ์ง“์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ธฐ์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค๋ฅผ ์ž‘๋™์‹œ์ผœ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์˜ ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ๋ฅผ ์ง€ํƒฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ thrust๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋ฉฐ roll์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ์˜ moment ์ƒ์„ฑ์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์„œ๋ณด๋ชจํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋‚ ๊ฐฏ์ง“์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ขŒ์šฐ thrust์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ pitch ์™€ yaw ์ถ•์œผ๋กœ์˜ ๋ชจ๋ฉ˜ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด ๋‚ด๋ถ€์—๋Š” ์•„๋‘์ด๋…ธ ๋ณด๋“œ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ํƒ‘์žฌ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ธ”๋ฃจํˆฌ์Šค ํ†ต์‹  ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์™ธ๋ถ€์™€ ํ†ต์‹  ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์˜ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ตฌ๋™๊ธฐ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํž˜์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‚ ๊ฐฏ์ง“ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํž˜์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ธก์ •์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด DC๋ชจํ„ฐ ์ž…๋ ฅ ๋Œ€๋น„ thrust ํฌ๊ธฐ, ์„œ๋ณด๋ชจํ„ฐ command ์ž…๋ ฅ ๋Œ€๋น„ moment ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‚ ๊ฐฏ์ง“ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด๋ฅผ ๊ณต์ค‘์— ๋„์šธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ thrust๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ฉ˜ํŠธ ์ƒ์„ฑ ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์˜ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” 3์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์šด๋™๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด roll, pitch, yaw ์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํž˜๊ณผ ํšŒ์ „ ์šด๋™๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ์šด๋™๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์œ ๋„ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์˜ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์•ˆ์ •ํ™”์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•˜๋Š” PID ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์˜ ๊ถค์ ์ถ”์ข… ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์— ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์˜ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋˜๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ค‘๋ฃจํ”„ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉ์‹œ์ผœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์˜ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด์™€ ๊ถค์  ์ถ”์ข… ์ œ์–ด๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด์™€ ์•ž์„œ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•œ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์˜๋„์— ๋งž๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‚ด๋Š”์ง€ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ž์ด๋กœ ์‹คํ—˜์žฅ์น˜๋ฅผ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋‹น ์‹คํ—˜์žฅ์น˜๋Š” roll, pitch, yaw ์ถ•์œผ๋กœ ํšŒ์ „์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋„๋ก ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์‹คํ—˜์žฅ์น˜ ์ž์ฒด์˜ ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด MDF ์†Œ์žฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ค์—ˆ๋‹ค. roll, pitch, yaw 3์ถ•์ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ 3์ถ•์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” 2๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ƒํ™ฉ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์•ž์„œ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•œ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ํ•ด๋‹น ์‹คํ—˜ ์žฅ์น˜ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์˜๋„์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์ œ์–ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š”์ง€ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ถค์  ์ถ”์ข…์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” 2๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋น„ํ–‰ ์ƒํ™ฉ์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ฒœ์žฅ๊ณผ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด ์ƒ๋‹จ๋ถ€์— ์‹ค์„ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•˜์—ฌ 2D ํ‰๋ฉด์ƒ์—์„œ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ฃผ์›Œ์ง„ ๊ถค์ ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์›€์ง์ด๋Š”์ง€, ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด ์ƒ๋‹จ๋ถ€์— ํ—ฌ๋ฅจ์ด ์ฃผ์ž…๋œ ํ’์„ ์„ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์‹œ์ผœ 3D ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ƒ์—์„œ ์ฃผ์›Œ์ง„ ๊ถค์ ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ถ”์ข… ๋น„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒํ™ฉ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๊ถค์ ์„ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ž˜ ์ถ”์ข…ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋์œผ๋กœ, ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์žฅ์น˜(์‹ค, ํ’์„ )๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณต์ค‘์—์„œ ๋น„ํ–‰์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ œ์ž๋ฆฌ ๋น„ํ–‰์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, 15์ดˆ๊ฐ€๋Ÿ‰ 1m3 ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ œ์ž๋ฆฌ ๋น„ํ–‰์ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.Flapping wing micro air vehicles (FWMAVs) that generate thrust and lift by flapping their wings are regarded as promising flight vehicles because of their advantages in terms of similar appearance and maneuverability to natural creatures. Reducing weight and air resistance, insect-inspired tailless FWMAVs are an attractive aerial vehicle rather than bird-inspired FWMAVs. However, they are challenging platforms to achieve autonomous flight because they have insufficient control surfaces to secure passive stability and a complicated wing mechanism for generating three-axis control moments simultaneously. In this thesis, as preliminary autonomous flight research, I present the study of an attitude regulation and trajectory tracking control of a tailless FWMAV developed. For these tasks, I develop my platform, which includes two DC motors for generating thrust to support its weight and servo motors for generating three-axis control moments to regulate its flight attitude. First, I conduct the force and moment measurement experiment to confirm the magnitude and direction of the lift and moment generated from the wing mechanism. From the measurement test, it is confirmed that the wing mechanism generates enough thrust to float the vehicle and control moments for attitude regulation. Through the dynamic equations in the three-axis direction of the vehicle, a controller for maintaining a stable attitude of the vehicle can be designed. To this end, a dynamic equation related to the rotational motion in the roll, pitch, and yaw axes is derived. Based on the derived dynamic equations, we design a proportional-integral-differential controller (PID) type controller to compensate for the attitude of the vehicle. Besides, we use a multi-loop control structure (inner-loop: attitude control, outer-loop: position control) to track various trajectories. Simulation results show that the designed controller is effective in regulating the platforms attitude and tracking a trajectory. To check whether the developed vehicle and the designed controller are operating effectively to regulate its attitude, I design a lightweight gyroscope apparatus using medium-density-fiberboard (MDF) material. The rig is capable of freely rotating in the roll, pitch, and yaw axes. I consider two situations in which each axis is controlled independently, and all axes are controlled simultaneously. In both cases, attitude regulation is properly performed. Two flight situations are considered for the trajectory tracking experiment. In the first case, a string connects between the ceiling and the top of the platform. In the second case, the helium-filled balloon is connected to the top of the vehicle. In both cases, the platform tracks various types of trajectories well in error by less than 10 cm. Finally, an experiment is conducted to check whether the tailless FWMAV could fly autonomously in place by removing external devices (string, balloon), and the tailless FWMAV flies within 1 m^3 space for about 15 seconds1.Introduction 1 1.1 Background & Motivation 1 1.2 Literature review 3 1.3 Thesis contribution 7 1.4 Thesis outline 8 2.Design of tailless FWMAV 13 2.1 Platform appearance 13 2.2 Flight control system 17 2.3 Principle of actuator mechanism 18 3.Force measurement experiment 28 3.1 Measurement setup 28 3.2 Measurement results 30 4.Dynamics & Controller design 37 4.1 Preliminary 37 4.2 Dynamics & Attitude control 39 4.2.1 Roll direction 41 4.2.2 Pitch direction 43 4.2.3 Yaw direction 45 4.2.4 PID control 47 4.3 Trajectory tracking control 48 5.Attitude regulation experiments 50 5.1 Design of gyroscope testbed 50 5.2 Experimental environment 52 5.3 Roll axis free 53 5.3.1 Simulation 54 5.3.2 Experiment 55 5.4 Pitch axis free 56 5.4.1 Simulation 57 5.4.2 Experiment 58 5.5 Yaw axis free 59 5.5.1 Simulation 59 5.5.2 Experiment 60 5.6 All axes free 60 5.6.1 Simulation 60 5.6.2 Experiment 61 5.7 Design of universal joint testbed & Experiment 64 6.Trajectory tracking 68 6.1 Simulation 68 6.2 Preliminary 69 6.3 Experiment: Tied-to-the-ceiling 70 6.4 Experiment: Hung-to-a-balloon 71 6.5 Summary 72 6.6 Hovering flight 73 7.Conclusion 83 A Appendix: Wing gearbox 85 A.1 4-bar linkage structure 85 B Appendix: Disturbance observer (DOB) 87 B.1 DOB controller 87 B.2 Simulation 89 B.2.1 Step input 89 B.2.2 Sinusoid input 91 B.3 Experiment 92 References 95Docto

    On Aerial Robots with Grasping and Perching Capabilities: A Comprehensive Review

    Get PDF
    Over the last decade, there has been an increased interest in developing aerial robotic platforms that exhibit grasping and perching capabilities not only within the research community but also in companies across different industry sectors. Aerial robots range from standard multicopter vehicles/drones, to autonomous helicopters, and fixed-wing or hybrid devices. Such devices rely on a range of different solutions for achieving grasping and perching. These solutions can be classified as: 1) simple gripper systems, 2) arm-gripper systems, 3) tethered gripping mechanisms, 4) reconfigurable robot frames, 5) adhesion solutions, and 6) embedment solutions. Grasping and perching are two crucial capabilities that allow aerial robots to interact with the environment and execute a plethora of complex tasks, facilitating new applications that range from autonomous package delivery and search and rescue to autonomous inspection of dangerous or remote environments. In this review paper, we present the state-of-the-art in aerial grasping and perching mechanisms and we provide a comprehensive comparison of their characteristics. Furthermore, we analyze these mechanisms by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed technologies and we summarize the significant achievements in these two research topics. Finally, we conclude the review by suggesting a series of potential future research directions that we believe that are promising

    A Survey on Aerial Swarm Robotics

    Get PDF
    The use of aerial swarms to solve real-world problems has been increasing steadily, accompanied by falling prices and improving performance of communication, sensing, and processing hardware. The commoditization of hardware has reduced unit costs, thereby lowering the barriers to entry to the field of aerial swarm robotics. A key enabling technology for swarms is the family of algorithms that allow the individual members of the swarm to communicate and allocate tasks amongst themselves, plan their trajectories, and coordinate their flight in such a way that the overall objectives of the swarm are achieved efficiently. These algorithms, often organized in a hierarchical fashion, endow the swarm with autonomy at every level, and the role of a human operator can be reduced, in principle, to interactions at a higher level without direct intervention. This technology depends on the clever and innovative application of theoretical tools from control and estimation. This paper reviews the state of the art of these theoretical tools, specifically focusing on how they have been developed for, and applied to, aerial swarms. Aerial swarms differ from swarms of ground-based vehicles in two respects: they operate in a three-dimensional space and the dynamics of individual vehicles adds an extra layer of complexity. We review dynamic modeling and conditions for stability and controllability that are essential in order to achieve cooperative flight and distributed sensing. The main sections of this paper focus on major results covering trajectory generation, task allocation, adversarial control, distributed sensing, monitoring, and mapping. Wherever possible, we indicate how the physics and subsystem technologies of aerial robots are brought to bear on these individual areas
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore