650 research outputs found
The Random Oracle Methodology, Revisited
We take a critical look at the relationship between the security of
cryptographic schemes in the Random Oracle Model, and the security of the
schemes that result from implementing the random oracle by so called
"cryptographic hash functions". The main result of this paper is a negative
one: There exist signature and encryption schemes that are secure in the Random
Oracle Model, but for which any implementation of the random oracle results in
insecure schemes.
In the process of devising the above schemes, we consider possible
definitions for the notion of a "good implementation" of a random oracle,
pointing out limitations and challenges.Comment: 31 page
Efficient UC Commitment Extension with Homomorphism for Free (and Applications)
Homomorphic universally composable (UC) commitments allow for the sender to reveal the result of additions and multiplications of values contained in commitments without revealing the values themselves while assuring the receiver of the correctness of such computation on committed values.
In this work, we construct essentially optimal additively homomorphic UC commitments from any (not necessarily UC or homomorphic) extractable commitment. We obtain amortized linear computational complexity in the length of the input messages and rate 1.
Next, we show how to extend our scheme to also obtain multiplicative homomorphism at the cost of asymptotic optimality but retaining low concrete complexity for practical parameters.
While the previously best constructions use UC oblivious transfer as the main building block, our constructions only require extractable commitments and PRGs, achieving better concrete efficiency and offering new insights into the sufficient conditions for obtaining homomorphic UC commitments.
Moreover, our techniques yield public coin protocols, which are compatible with the Fiat-Shamir heuristic.
These results come at the cost of realizing a restricted version of the homomorphic commitment functionality where the sender is allowed to perform any number of commitments and operations on committed messages but is only allowed to perform a single batch opening of a number of commitments.
Although this functionality seems restrictive, we show that it can be used as a building block for more efficient instantiations of recent protocols for secure multiparty computation and zero knowledge non-interactive arguments of knowledge
Lattice-Based Group Signatures: Achieving Full Dynamicity (and Deniability) with Ease
In this work, we provide the first lattice-based group signature that offers
full dynamicity (i.e., users have the flexibility in joining and leaving the
group), and thus, resolve a prominent open problem posed by previous works.
Moreover, we achieve this non-trivial feat in a relatively simple manner.
Starting with Libert et al.'s fully static construction (Eurocrypt 2016) -
which is arguably the most efficient lattice-based group signature to date, we
introduce simple-but-insightful tweaks that allow to upgrade it directly into
the fully dynamic setting. More startlingly, our scheme even produces slightly
shorter signatures than the former, thanks to an adaptation of a technique
proposed by Ling et al. (PKC 2013), allowing to prove inequalities in
zero-knowledge. Our design approach consists of upgrading Libert et al.'s
static construction (EUROCRYPT 2016) - which is arguably the most efficient
lattice-based group signature to date - into the fully dynamic setting.
Somewhat surprisingly, our scheme produces slightly shorter signatures than the
former, thanks to a new technique for proving inequality in zero-knowledge
without relying on any inequality check. The scheme satisfies the strong
security requirements of Bootle et al.'s model (ACNS 2016), under the Short
Integer Solution (SIS) and the Learning With Errors (LWE) assumptions.
Furthermore, we demonstrate how to equip the obtained group signature scheme
with the deniability functionality in a simple way. This attractive
functionality, put forward by Ishida et al. (CANS 2016), enables the tracing
authority to provide an evidence that a given user is not the owner of a
signature in question. In the process, we design a zero-knowledge protocol for
proving that a given LWE ciphertext does not decrypt to a particular message
Naor-Yung paradigm with shared randomness and applications
The Naor-Yung paradigm (Naor and Yung, STOC’90) allows to generically boost security under chosen-plaintext attacks (CPA) to security against chosen-ciphertext attacks (CCA) for public-key encryption (PKE) schemes. The main idea is to encrypt the plaintext twice (under independent public keys), and to append a non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) proof that the two ciphertexts indeed encrypt the same message. Later work by Camenisch, Chandran, and Shoup (Eurocrypt’09) and Naor and Segev (Crypto’09 and SIAM J. Comput.’12) established that the very same techniques can also be used in the settings of key-dependent message (KDM) and key-leakage attacks (respectively). In this paper we study the conditions under which the two ciphertexts in the Naor-Yung construction can share the same random coins. We find that this is possible, provided that the underlying PKE scheme meets an additional simple property. The motivation for re-using the same random coins is that this allows to design much more efficient NIZK proofs. We showcase such an improvement in the random oracle model, under standard complexity assumptions including Decisional Diffie-Hellman, Quadratic Residuosity, and Subset Sum. The length of the resulting ciphertexts is reduced by 50%, yielding truly efficient PKE schemes achieving CCA security under KDM and key-leakage attacks. As an additional contribution, we design the first PKE scheme whose CPA security under KDM attacks can be directly reduced to (low-density instances of) the Subset Sum assumption. The scheme supports keydependent messages computed via any affine function of the secret ke
Security of the Fiat-Shamir Transformation in the Quantum Random-Oracle Model
The famous Fiat-Shamir transformation turns any public-coin three-round
interactive proof, i.e., any so-called sigma-protocol, into a non-interactive
proof in the random-oracle model. We study this transformation in the setting
of a quantum adversary that in particular may query the random oracle in
quantum superposition.
Our main result is a generic reduction that transforms any quantum dishonest
prover attacking the Fiat-Shamir transformation in the quantum random-oracle
model into a similarly successful quantum dishonest prover attacking the
underlying sigma-protocol (in the standard model). Applied to the standard
soundness and proof-of-knowledge definitions, our reduction implies that both
these security properties, in both the computational and the statistical
variant, are preserved under the Fiat-Shamir transformation even when allowing
quantum attacks. Our result improves and completes the partial results that
have been known so far, but it also proves wrong certain claims made in the
literature.
In the context of post-quantum secure signature schemes, our results imply
that for any sigma-protocol that is a proof-of-knowledge against quantum
dishonest provers (and that satisfies some additional natural properties), the
corresponding Fiat-Shamir signature scheme is secure in the quantum
random-oracle model. For example, we can conclude that the non-optimized
version of Fish, which is the bare Fiat-Shamir variant of the NIST candidate
Picnic, is secure in the quantum random-oracle model.Comment: 20 page
- …