9 research outputs found

    ECONOMIC MODELS FOR ALLOCATING RESOURCES IN COMPUTER SYSTEMS

    Full text link

    Applications of Repeated Games in Wireless Networks: A Survey

    Full text link
    A repeated game is an effective tool to model interactions and conflicts for players aiming to achieve their objectives in a long-term basis. Contrary to static noncooperative games that model an interaction among players in only one period, in repeated games, interactions of players repeat for multiple periods; and thus the players become aware of other players' past behaviors and their future benefits, and will adapt their behavior accordingly. In wireless networks, conflicts among wireless nodes can lead to selfish behaviors, resulting in poor network performances and detrimental individual payoffs. In this paper, we survey the applications of repeated games in different wireless networks. The main goal is to demonstrate the use of repeated games to encourage wireless nodes to cooperate, thereby improving network performances and avoiding network disruption due to selfish behaviors. Furthermore, various problems in wireless networks and variations of repeated game models together with the corresponding solutions are discussed in this survey. Finally, we outline some open issues and future research directions.Comment: 32 pages, 15 figures, 5 tables, 168 reference

    Resource Allocation for Multiple Access and Broadcast Channels under Quality of Service Requirements Based on Strategy Proof Pricing

    Get PDF
    The efficient allocation of power is a major concern in today’s wireless communications systems. Due to the high demand in data rate and the scarcity of wireless resources such as power, the multi-user communication systems like the multiple access channel (MAC) and broadcast channel (BC) have become highly competitive environments for the users as well as the system itself. Theory of microeconomics and game theory provide the good analytical manner for the selfish and social welfare conflict problems. Instead of maximizing the system sum rate, our proposed system deals with fulfilling the utility (rate) requirement of all the users with efficient power allocation. The users formulate the signal to interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) based quality-of-service (QoS) requirements. We propose the framework to allocate the power to each user with universal pricing mechanisms. The prices act as the control signal and are assumed to be some virtual currency in the wireless system. They can influence the physical layer operating points to meet the desired utility requirements. Centralized and distributed power allocation frameworks are discussed separately in the thesis with different pricing schemes. In wireless systems we have users that are rational in the game theoretic sense of making decisions consistently in pursuit of their own individual objectives. Each user’s objective is to maximize the expected value of its own payoff measured on a certain utility scale. Selfishness or self-interest is an important implication of rationality. Therefore, the mobiles which share the same spectrum have incentives to misinterpret their private information in order to obtain more utility. They might behave selfishly and show also malicious behavior by creating increased interference for other mobiles. Therefore, it is important to supervise and influence the operation of the system by pricing and priority (weights) optimization. In the centralized resource allocation, we study the general MAC and BC (with linear and nonlinear receiver) with three types of agents: the regulator, the system optimizer and the mobile users. The regulator ensures the QoS requirements of all users by clever pricing and prevents cheating. The simple system optimizer solves a certain system utility maximization problem to allocate the power with the given prices and weights (priorities). The linear and nonlinear pricing mechanisms are analyzed, respectively. It is shown that linear pricing is a universal pricing only if successive interference cancellation (SIC) for uplink transmission or dirty paper coding (DPC) for downlink transmission is applied at the base station (BS). For MAC without SIC, nonlinear pricing which is logarithmic in power and linear in prices is a universal pricing scheme. The prices, the resulting cost terms, the optimal power allocation to achieve the QoS requirement of each user in the feasible rate region are derived in closed form solutions for MAC with and without SIC using linear and nonlinear pricing frameworks, respectively. The users are willing to maximize their achievable rate and minimize their cost on power by falsely reporting their channel state information (CSI). By predicting the best cheating strategy of the malicious users, the regulator is able to detect the misbehavior and punish the cheaters. The infinite repeated game (RG) is proposed as a counter mechanism with the trigger strategy using the trigger price. We show that by anticipating the total payoff of the proposed RG, the users have no incentive to cheat and therefore our framework is strategy-proof. In the distributed resource allocation, each user allocates its own power by optimizing the individual utility function. The noncooperative game among the users is formulated. The individual prices are introduced to the utility function of each user to shift the Nash equilibrium (NE) power allocation to the desired point. We show that by implicit control of the proposed prices, the best response (BR) power allocation of each user converges rapidly. The Shannon rate-based QoS requirement of each user is achieved with minimum power at the unique NE point. We analyse different behavior types of the users, especially the malicious behavior of misrepresenting the user utility function. The resulting NE power allocation and achievable rates of all users are derived when malicious behavior exists. The strategy-proof mechanism is designed using the punishment prices when the types of the malicious users are detected. The algorithm of the strategy-proof noncooperative game is proposed. We illustrate the convergence of the BR dynamic and the Price of Malice (PoM) by numerical simulations. The uplink transmission within the single cell of heterogeneous networks is exactly the same model as MAC. Therefore, the results of the pricing-based power allocation for MAC can be implemented into heterogeneous networks. Femtocells deployed in the Macrocell network provide better indoor coverage to the user equipments (UEs) with low power consumption and maintenance cost. The industrial vendors show great interest in the access mode, called the hybrid access, in which the macrocell UEs (MUEs) can be served by the nearby Femtocell Access Point (FAP). By adopting hybrid access in the femtocell, the system energy efficiency is improved due to the short distance between the FAP and MUEs while at the same time, the QoS requirements are better guaranteed. However, both the Macrocell base station (MBS) and the FAP are rational and selfish, who maximize their own utilities. The framework to successively apply the hybrid access in femtocell and fulfill the QoS requirement of each UE is important. We propose two novel compensation frameworks to motivate the hybrid access of femtocells. To save the energy consumption, the MBS is willing to motivate the FAP for hybrid access with compensation. The Stackelberg game is formulated where the MBS serves as the leader and the FAP serves as the follower. The MBS maximizes its utility by choosing the compensation prices. The FAP optimizes its utility by selecting the number of MUEs in hybrid access. By choosing the proper compensation price, the optimal number of MUEs served by the FAP to maximize the utility of the MBS coincides with that to maximize the utility of the FAP. Numerous simulation results are conducted, showing that the proposed compensation frameworks result in a win-win solution. In this thesis, based on game theory, mechanism design and pricing framework, efficient power allocation are proposed to guarantee the QoS requirements of all users in the wireless networks. The results are applicable in the multi-user systems such as heterogeneous networks. Both centralized and distributed allocation schemes are analyzed which are suitable for different communication scenarios.Aufgrund der hohen Nachfrage nach Datenrate und wegen der Knappheit an Ressourcen in Funknetzen ist die effiziente Allokation von Leistung ein wichtiges Thema in den heutigen Mehrnutzer-Kommunikationssystemen. Die Spieltheorie bietet Methoden, um egoistische und soziale Konfliktsituationen zu analysieren. Das vorgeschlagene System befasst sich mit der Erfüllung der auf Signal-zu-Rausch-und-Interferenz-Verhältnis (SINR) basierenden Quality-of-Service (QoS)-Anforderungen aller Nutzer mittels effizienter Leistungsallokation, anstatt die Übertragungsrate zu maximieren. Es wird ein Framework entworfen, um die Leistungsallokation mittels universellen Pricing-Mechanismen umzusetzen. In der Dissertation werden zentralisierte und verteilte Leistungsallokationsalgorithmen unter Verwendung verschiedener Pricing-Ansätze diskutiert. Die Nutzer in Funksystemen handeln rational im spieltheoretischen Sinne, indem sie ihre eigenen Nutzenfunktionen maximieren. Die mobilen Endgeräte, die dasselbe Spektrum nutzen, haben den Anreiz durch bewusste Fehlinterpretation ihrer privaten Informationen das eigene Ergebnis zu verbessern. Daher ist es wichtig, die Funktionalität des Systems zu überwachen und durch Optimierung des Pricings und Priorisierungsgewichte zu beeinflussen. Für den zentralisierten Ressourcenallokationsansatz werden der allgemeine Mehrfachzugriffskanal (Multiple Access Channel, MAC) und der Broadcastkanal (BC) mit linearen bzw. nichtlinearen Empfängern untersucht. Die Preise, die resultierenden Kostenterme und die optimale Leistungsallokation, mit der die QoS-Anforderungen in der zulässigen Ratenregion erfüllt werden, werden in geschlossener Form hergeleitet. Lineare und nichtlineare Pricing-Ansätze werden separat diskutiert. Das unendlich oft wiederholte Spiel wird vorgeschlagen, um Spieler vom Betrügen durch Übermittlung falscher Kanalinformationen abzuhalten. Für die verteilten Ressourcenvergabe wird das nichtkooperative Spiel in Normalform verwendet und formuliert. Die Nutzer wählen ihre Sendeleistung zur Maximierung ihrer eigenen Nutzenfunktion. Individuelle Preise werden eingeführt und so angepasst, dass die QoS-Anforderungen mit der Leistungsallokation im eindeutigen Nash-Gleichgewicht erfüllt werden. Verschiedene Arten des Nutzerverhaltens werden bezüglich der Täuschung ihrer Nutzenfunktion analysiert, und ein Strategy-Proof-Mechanismus mit Strafen wird entwickelt. Die Ergebnisse für den MAC sind anwendbar auf heterogene Netzwerke, wobei zwei neuartige Ansätze zur Kompensation bereitgestellt werden, die den hybriden Zugang zu Femtozell-Netzwerken motivieren. Mithilfe des Stackelberg-Spiels wird gezeigt, dass die vorgeschlagenen Ansätze in einer Win-Win-Situation resultieren

    Game Theory in Communications:a Study of Two Scenarios

    Get PDF
    Multi-user communication theory typically studies the fundamental limits of communication systems, and considers communication schemes that approach or even achieve these limits. The functioning of many such schemes assumes that users always cooperate, even when it is not in their own best interest. In practice, this assumption need not be fulfilled, as rational communication participants are often only interested in maximizing their own communication experience, and may behave in an undesirable manner from the system's point of view. Thus, communication systems may operate differently than intended if the behavior of individual participants is not taken into account. In this thesis, we study how users make decisions in wireless settings, by considering their preferences and how they interact with each other. We investigate whether the outcomes of their decisions are desirable, and, if not, what can be done to improve them. In particular, we focus on two related issues. The first is the decision-making of communication users in the absence of any central authority, which we consider in the context of the Gaussian multiple access channel. The second is the pricing of wireless resources, which we consider in the context of the competition of wireless service providers for users who are not contractually tied to any provider, but free to choose the one offering the best tradeoff of parameters. In the first part of the thesis, we model the interaction of self-interested users in a Gaussian multiple access channel using non-cooperative game theory. We demonstrate that the lack of infrastructure leads to an inefficient outcome for users who interact only once, specifically due to the lack of coordination between users. Using evolutionary game theory, we show that this inefficient outcome would also arise as a result of repeated interaction of many individuals over time. On the other hand, if the users correlate their decoding schedule with the outcome of some publicly observed (pseudo) random variable, the resulting outcome is efficient. This shows that sometimes it takes very little intervention on the part of the system planner to make sure that users choose a desirable operating point. In the second part of the thesis, we consider the competition of wireless service providers for users who are free to choose their service provider based on their channel parameters and the resource price. We model this situation as a two-stage game where the providers announce unit resource prices in the first stage and the users choose how much resource they want to purchase from each provider in the second stage. Under fairly general conditions, we show that the competitive interaction of users and providers results in socially optimal resource allocation. We also provide a decentralized primal-dual algorithm and prove its convergence to the socially optimal outcome

    Allocation et tarification des accès réseaux

    Full text link
    Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal

    Reports to the President

    Get PDF
    A compilation of annual reports for the 1985-1986 academic year, including a report from the President of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, as well as reports from the academic and administrative units of the Institute. The reports outline the year's goals, accomplishments, honors and awards, and future plans

    2007-2008 UNM CATALOG

    Get PDF
    Course catalog for the years 2007-2008.https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/course_catalogs/1022/thumbnail.jp

    2006-2007 UNM CATALOG

    Get PDF
    Course catalog for the years 2006-2007.https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/course_catalogs/1011/thumbnail.jp
    corecore