2,505 research outputs found

    Phase Locked Loop Test Methodology

    Get PDF
    Phase locked loops are incorporated into almost every large-scale mixed signal and digital system on chip (SOC). Various types of PLL architectures exist including fully analogue, fully digital, semi-digital, and software based. Currently the most commonly used PLL architecture for SOC environments and chipset applications is the Charge-Pump (CP) semi-digital type. This architecture is commonly used for clock synthesis applications, such as the supply of a high frequency on-chip clock, which is derived from a low frequency board level clock. In addition, CP-PLL architectures are now frequently used for demanding RF (Radio Frequency) synthesis, and data synchronization applications. On chip system blocks that rely on correct PLL operation may include third party IP cores, ADCs, DACs and user defined logic (UDL). Basically, any on-chip function that requires a stable clock will be reliant on correct PLL operation. As a direct consequence it is essential that the PLL function is reliably verified during both the design and debug phase and through production testing. This chapter focuses on test approaches related to embedded CP-PLLs used for the purpose of clock generation for SOC. However, methods discussed will generally apply to CP-PLLs used for other applications

    Hardware simulation of KU-band spacecraft receiver and bit synchronizer, phase 2, volume 1

    Get PDF
    The acquisition behavior of the PN subsystem of an automatically acquiring spacecraft receiver was studied. A symbol synchronizer subsystem was constructed and integrated into the composite simulation of the receiver. The overall performance of the receiver when subjected to anomalies such as signal fades was evaluated. Potential problems associated with PN/carrier sweep interactions were investigated

    ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ๊ฒ€์ถœ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ํด๋ก ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ณต์› ํšŒ๋กœ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก 

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ •๋ณด๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2022. 8. ์ •๋•๊ท .In this thesis, a design of a high-speed, power-efficient, wide-range clock and data recovery (CDR) without a reference clock is proposed. A frequency acquisition scheme using a stochastic frequency detector (SFD) based on the Alexander phase detector (PD) is utilized for the referenceless operation. Pat-tern histogram analysis is presented to analyze the frequency acquisition behavior of the SFD and verified by simulation. Based on the information obtained by pattern histogram analysis, SFD using autocovariance is proposed. With a direct-proportional path and a digital integral path, the proposed referenceless CDR achieves frequency lock at all measurable conditions, and the measured frequency acquisition time is within 7ฮผs. The prototype chip has been fabricated in a 40-nm CMOS process and occupies an active area of 0.032 mm2. The proposed referenceless CDR achieves the BER of less than 10-12 at 32 Gb/s and exhibits an energy efficiency of 1.15 pJ/b at 32 Gb/s with a 1.0 V supply.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ํด๋Ÿญ์ด ์—†๋Š” ๊ณ ์†, ์ €์ „๋ ฅ, ๊ด‘๋Œ€์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๋™์ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” ํด๋Ÿญ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ณต์›ํšŒ๋กœ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์ค€ ํด๋Ÿญ์ด ์—†๋Š” ๋™์ž‘์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์•Œ๋ ‰์‚ฐ๋” ์œ„์ƒ ๊ฒ€์ถœ๊ธฐ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ๊ฒ€์ถœ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ํš๋“ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ๊ฒ€์ถœ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ์ถ”์  ์–‘์ƒ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํŒจํ„ด ํžˆ์Šคํ† ๊ทธ๋žจ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํŒจํ„ด ํžˆ์Šคํ† ๊ทธ๋žจ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์€ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ž๊ธฐ๊ณต๋ถ„์‚ฐ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ๊ฒ€์ถœ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ง์ ‘ ๋น„๋ก€ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์™€ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ ๋ถ„ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ํด๋Ÿญ์ด ์—†๋Š” ํด๋Ÿญ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ณต์›ํšŒ๋กœ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ์ธก์ • ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ์ž ๊ธˆ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณตํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—์„œ ์ธก์ •๋œ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ์ถ”์  ์‹œ๊ฐ„์€ 7ฮผs ์ด๋‚ด์ด๋‹ค. 40-nm CMOS ๊ณต์ •์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ง„ ์นฉ์€ 0.032 mm2์˜ ๋ฉด์ ์„ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ํด๋Ÿญ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ณต์›ํšŒ๋กœ๋Š” 32 Gb/s์˜ ์†๋„์—์„œ ๋น„ํŠธ์—๋Ÿฌ์œจ 10-12 ์ดํ•˜๋กœ ๋™์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํšจ์œจ์€ 32Gb/s์˜ ์†๋„์—์„œ 1.0V ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ „์••์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 1.15 pJ/b์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 MOTIVATION 1 1.2 THESIS ORGANIZATION 13 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUNDS 14 2.1 CLOCKING ARCHITECTURES IN SERIAL LINK INTERFACE 14 2.2 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLOCK AND DATA RECOVERY 24 2.2.1 OVERVIEW 24 2.2.2 JITTER 26 2.2.3 CDR JITTER CHARACTERISTICS 33 2.3 CDR ARCHITECTURES 39 2.3.1 PLL-BASED CDR โ€“ WITH EXTERNAL REFERENCE CLOCK 39 2.3.2 DLL/PI-BASED CDR 44 2.3.3 PLL-BASED CDR โ€“ WITHOUT EXTERNAL REFERENCE CLOCK 47 2.4 FREQUENCY ACQUISITION SCHEME 50 2.4.1 TYPICAL FREQUENCY DETECTORS 50 2.4.1.1 DIGITAL QUADRICORRELATOR FREQUENCY DETECTOR 50 2.4.1.2 ROTATIONAL FREQUENCY DETECTOR 54 2.4.2 PRIOR WORKS 56 CHAPTER 3 DESIGN OF THE REFERENCELESS CDR USING SFD 58 3.1 OVERVIEW 58 3.2 PROPOSED FREQUENCY DETECTOR 62 3.2.1 MOTIVATION 62 3.2.2 PATTERN HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS 68 3.2.3 INTRODUCTION OF AUTOCOVARIANCE TO STOCHASTIC FREQUENCY DETECTOR 75 3.3 CIRCUIT IMPLEMENTATION 83 3.3.1 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED REFERENCELESS CDR 83 3.3.2 CONTINUOUS-TIME LINEAR EQUALIZER (CTLE) 85 3.3.3 DIGITALLY-CONTROLLED OSCILLATOR (DCO) 87 3.4 MEASUREMENT RESULTS 89 CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSION 99 APPENDIX A DETAILED FREQUENCY ACQUISITION WAVEFORMS OF THE PROPOSED SFD 100 BIBLIOGRAPHY 108 ์ดˆ ๋ก 122๋ฐ•

    ๊ณ ์† DRAM ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ „์•• ๋ฐ ์˜จ๋„์— ๋‘”๊ฐํ•œ ํด๋ก ํŒจ์Šค์™€ ์œ„์ƒ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜ ๊ต์ •๊ธฐ ์„ค๊ณ„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ •๋ณด๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021. 2. ์ •๋•๊ท .To cope with problems caused by the high-speed operation of the dynamic random access memory (DRAM) interface, several approaches are proposed that are focused on the clock path of the DRAM. Two delay-locked loop (DLL) based schemes, a forwarded-clock (FC) receiver (RX) with self-tracking loop and a quadrature error corrector, are proposed. Moreover, an open-loop based scheme is presented for drift compensation in the clock distribution. The open-loop scheme consumes less power consumption and reduces design complexity. The FC RX uses DLLs to compensate for voltage and temperature (VT) drift in unmatched memory interfaces. The self-tracking loop consists of two-stage cascaded DLLs to operate in a DRAM environment. With the write training and the proposed DLL, the timing relationship between the data and the sampling clock is always optimal. The proposed scheme compensates for delay drift without relying on data transitions or re-training. The proposed FC RX is fabricated in 65-nm CMOS process and has an active area containing 4 data lanes of 0.0329 mm2. After the write training is completed at the supply voltage of 1 V, the measured timing margin remains larger than 0.31-unit interval (UI) when the supply voltage drifts in the range of 0.94 V and 1.06 V from the training voltage, 1 V. At the data rate of 6.4 Gb/s, the proposed FC RX achieves an energy efficiency of 0.45 pJ/bit. Contrary to the aforementioned scheme, an open-loop-based voltage drift compensation method is proposed to minimize power consumption and occupied area. The overall clock distribution is composed of a current mode logic (CML) path and a CMOS path. In the proposed scheme, the architecture of the CML-to-CMOS converter (C2C) and the inverter is changed to compensate for supply voltage drift. The bias generator provides bias voltages to the C2C and inverters according to supply voltage for delay adjustment. The proposed clock tree is fabricated in 40 nm CMOS process and the active area is 0.004 mm2. When the supply voltage is modulated by a sinusoidal wave with 1 MHz, 100 mV peak-to-peak swing from the center of 1.1 V, applying the proposed scheme reduces the measured root-mean-square (RMS) jitter from 3.77 psRMS to 1.61 psRMS. At 6 GHz output clock, the power consumption of the proposed scheme is 11.02 mW. A DLL-based quadrature error corrector (QEC) with a wide correction range is proposed for the DRAM whose clocks are distributed over several millimeters. The quadrature error is corrected by adjusting delay lines using information from the phase error detector. The proposed error correction method minimizes increased jitter due to phase error correction by setting at least one of the delay lines in the quadrature clock path to the minimum delay. In addition, the asynchronous calibration on-off scheme reduces power consumption after calibration is complete. The proposed QEC is fabricated in 40 nm CMOS process and has an active area of 0.048 mm2. The proposed QEC exhibits a wide correctable error range of 101.6 ps and the remaining phase errors are less than 2.18ยฐ from 0.8 GHz to 2.3 GHz clock. At 2.3 GHz, the QEC contributes 0.53 psRMS jitter. Also, at 2.3 GHz, the power consumption is reduced from 8.89 mW to 3.39 mW when the calibration is off.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋™์  ๋žœ๋ค ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ (DRAM)์˜ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํด๋ก ํŒจ์Šค์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€์ฒ˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํšŒ๋กœ๋“ค์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ํšŒ๋กœ๋“ค ์ค‘ ๋‘ ๋ฐฉ์‹๋“ค์€ ์ง€์—ฐ๋™๊ธฐ๋ฃจํ”„ (delay-locked loop) ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ๋ฉด์ ๊ณผ ์ „๋ ฅ ์†Œ๋ชจ๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์˜คํ”ˆ ๋ฃจํ”„ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. DRAM์˜ ๋น„์ •ํ•ฉ ์ˆ˜์‹ ๊ธฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์—์„œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํŒจ์Šค์™€ ํด๋ก ํŒจ์Šค ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ง€์—ฐ ๋ถˆ์ผ์น˜๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ „์•• ๋ฐ ์˜จ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์…‹์—… ํƒ€์ž„ ๋ฐ ํ™€๋“œ ํƒ€์ž„์ด ์ค„์–ด๋“œ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ง€์—ฐ๋™๊ธฐ๋ฃจํ”„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์ง€์—ฐ๋™๊ธฐ๋ฃจํ”„ ํšŒ๋กœ๋Š” DRAM ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋™์ž‘ํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ง€์—ฐ๋™๊ธฐ๋ฃจํ”„๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์“ฐ๊ธฐ ํ›ˆ๋ จ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ํด๋ก์„ ํƒ€์ด๋ฐ ๋งˆ์ง„ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋‘˜ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ฒœ์ด ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. 65-nm CMOS ๊ณต์ •์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ง„ ์นฉ์€ 6.4 Gb/s์—์„œ 0.45 pJ/bit์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํšจ์œจ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ 1 V์—์„œ ์“ฐ๊ธฐ ํ›ˆ๋ จ ๋ฐ ์ง€์—ฐ๋™๊ธฐ๋ฃจํ”„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ์ •์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  0.94 V์—์„œ 1.06 V๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์ „์••์ด ๋ฐ”๋€Œ์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ํƒ€์ด๋ฐ ๋งˆ์ง„์€ 0.31 UI๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ๊ฐ’์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ํšŒ๋กœ๋Š” ํด๋ก ๋ถ„ํฌ ํŠธ๋ฆฌ์—์„œ ์ „์•• ๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํด๋ก ํŒจ์Šค์˜ ์ง€์—ฐ์ด ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์•ž์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹๊ณผ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ ์˜คํ”ˆ ๋ฃจํ”„ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ํด๋ก ํŒจ์Šค์˜ ์ธ๋ฒ„ํ„ฐ์™€ CML-to-CMOS ๋ณ€ํ™˜๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ”์ด์–ด์Šค ์ƒ์„ฑ ํšŒ๋กœ์—์„œ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์ „์••์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ฐ”๋€Œ๋Š” ๋ฐ”์ด์–ด์Šค ์ „์••์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์ง€์—ฐ์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 40-nm CMOS ๊ณต์ •์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ง„ ์นฉ์˜ 6 GHz ํด๋ก์—์„œ์˜ ์ „๋ ฅ ์†Œ๋ชจ๋Š” 11.02 mW๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. 1.1 V ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ 1 MHz, 100 mV ํ”ผํฌ ํˆฌ ํ”ผํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์‚ฌ์ธํŒŒ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์ „์••์„ ๋ณ€์กฐํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์—์„œ์˜ ์ง€ํ„ฐ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ 3.77 psRMS์—์„œ 1.61 psRMS๋กœ ์ค„์–ด๋“ค์—ˆ๋‹ค. DRAM์˜ ์†ก์‹ ๊ธฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์—์„œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์œ„์ƒ ํด๋ก ๊ฐ„์˜ ์œ„์ƒ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋Š” ์†ก์‹ ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์œ ํšจ ์ฐฝ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ง€์—ฐ๋™๊ธฐ๋ฃจํ”„๋ฅผ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋œ ์ง€์—ฐ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์œ„์ƒ์ด ๊ต์ •๋œ ํด๋ก์—์„œ ์ง€ํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋œ ์ง€ํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์œ„์ƒ ๊ต์ •์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋œ ์ง€์—ฐ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์œ„์ƒ ๊ต์ • ํšŒ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์œ ํœด ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ์ „๋ ฅ ์†Œ๋ชจ๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์œ„์ƒ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๊ต์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ํšŒ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ž…๋ ฅ ํด๋ก๊ณผ ๋น„๋™๊ธฐ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋˜ํ•œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 40-nm CMOS ๊ณต์ •์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ง„ ์นฉ์˜ ์œ„์ƒ ๊ต์ • ๋ฒ”์œ„๋Š” 101.6 ps์ด๊ณ  0.8 GHz ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2.3 GHz๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ๋™์ž‘ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„์—์„œ ์œ„์ƒ ๊ต์ •๊ธฐ์˜ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ํด๋ก์˜ ์œ„์ƒ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋Š” 2.18ยฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž‘๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ์œ„์ƒ ๊ต์ • ํšŒ๋กœ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋œ ์ง€ํ„ฐ๋Š” 2.3 GHz์—์„œ 0.53 psRMS์ด๊ณ  ๊ต์ • ํšŒ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๊ป์„ ๋•Œ ์ „๋ ฅ ์†Œ๋ชจ๋Š” ๊ต์ • ํšŒ๋กœ๊ฐ€ ์ผœ์กŒ์„ ๋•Œ์ธ 8.89 mW์—์„œ 3.39 mW๋กœ ์ค„์–ด๋“ค์—ˆ๋‹ค.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Thesis Organization 4 Chapter 2 Background on DRAM Interface 5 2.1 Overview 5 2.2 Memory Interface 7 Chapter 3 Background on DLL 11 3.1 Overview 11 3.2 Building Blocks 15 3.2.1 Delay Line 15 3.2.2 Phase Detector 17 3.2.3 Charge Pump 19 3.2.4 Loop filter 20 Chapter 4 Forwarded-Clock Receiver with DLL-based Self-tracking Loop for Unmatched Memory Interfaces 21 4.1 Overview 21 4.2 Proposed Separated DLL 25 4.2.1 Operation of the Proposed Separated DLL 27 4.2.2 Operation of the Digital Loop Filter in DLL 31 4.3 Circuit Implementation 33 4.4 Measurement Results 37 4.4.1 Measurement Setup and Sequence 38 4.4.2 VT Drift Measurement and Simulation 40 Chapter 5 Open-loop-based Voltage Drift Compensation in Clock Distribution 46 5.1 Overview 46 5.2 Prior Works 50 5.3 Voltage Drift Compensation Method 52 5.4 Circuit Implementation 57 5.5 Measurement Results 61 Chapter 6 Quadrature Error Corrector with Minimum Total Delay Tracking 68 6.1 Overview 68 6.2 Prior Works 70 6.3 Quadrature Error Correction Method 73 6.4 Circuit Implementation 82 6.5 Measurement Results 88 Chapter 7 Conclusion 96 Bibliography 98 ์ดˆ๋ก 102Docto

    One way Doppler extractor. Volume 1: Vernier technique

    Get PDF
    A feasibility analysis, trade-offs, and implementation for a One Way Doppler Extraction system are discussed. A Doppler error analysis shows that quantization error is a primary source of Doppler measurement error. Several competing extraction techniques are compared and a Vernier technique is developed which obtains high Doppler resolution with low speed logic. Parameter trade-offs and sensitivities for the Vernier technique are analyzed, leading to a hardware design configuration. A detailed design, operation, and performance evaluation of the resulting breadboard model is presented which verifies the theoretical performance predictions. Performance tests have verified that the breadboard is capable of extracting Doppler, on an S-band signal, to an accuracy of less than 0.02 Hertz for a one second averaging period. This corresponds to a range rate error of no more than 3 millimeters per second

    Low jitter phase-locked loop clock synthesis with wide locking range

    Get PDF
    The fast growing demand of wireless and high speed data communications has driven efforts to increase the levels of integration in many communications applications. Phase noise and timing jitter are important design considerations for these communications applications. The desire for highly complex levels of integration using low cost CMOS technologies works against the minimization of timing jitter and phase noise for communications systems which employ a phase-locked loop for frequency and clock synthesis with on-chip VCO. This dictates an integrated CMOS implementation of the VCO with very low phase noise performance. The ring oscillator VCOs based on differential delay cell chains have been used successfully in communications applications, but thermal noise induced phase noise have to be minimized in order not to limit their applicability to some applications which impose stringent timing jitter and phase noise requirements on the PLL clock synthesizer. Obtaining lower timing jitter and phase noise at the PLL output also requires the minimization of noise in critical circuit design blocks as well as the optimization of the loop bandwidth of the PLL. In this dissertation the fundamental performance limits of CMOS PLL clock synthesizers based on ring oscillator VCOs are investigated. The effect of flicker and thermal noise in MOS transistors on timing jitter and phase noise are explored, with particular emphasis on source coupled NMOS differential delay cells with symmetric load elements. Several new circuit architectures are employed for the charge pump circuit and phase-frequency detector (PFD) to minimize the timing jitter due to the finite dead zone in the PFD and the current mismatch in the charge pump circuit. The selection of the optimum PLL loop bandwidth is critical in determining the phase noise performance at the PLL output. The optimum loop bandwidth and the phase noise performance of the PLL is determined using behavioral simulations. These results are compared with transistor level simulated results and experimental results for the PLL clock synthesizer fabricated in a 0.35 ยตm CMOS technology with good agreement. To demonstrate the proposed concept, a fully integrated CMOS PLL clock synthesizer utilizing integer-N frequency multiplier technique to synthesize several clock signals in the range of 20-400 MHz with low phase noise was designed. Implemented in a standard 0.35-ยตm N-well CMOS process technology, the PLL achieves a period jitter of 6.5-ps (rms) and 38-ps (peak-to-peak) at 216 MHz with a phase noise of -120 dBc/Hz at frequency offsets above 10 KHz. The specific research contributions of this work include (1) proposing, designing, and implementing a new charge pump circuit architecture that matches current levels and therefore minimizes one source of phase noise due to fluctuations in the control voltage of the VCO, (2) an improved phase-frequency detector architecture which has improved characteristics in lock condition, (3) an improved ring oscillator VCO with excellent thermal noise induced phase noise characteristics, (4) the application of selfbiased techniques together with fixed bias to CMOS low phase noise PLL clock synthesizer for digital video communications ,and (5) an analytical model that describes the phase noise performance of the proposed VCO and PLL clock synthesizer

    Delay Flip-Flop (DFF) Metastability Impact on Clock and Data Recovery (CDR) and Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) Circuits

    Get PDF
    Modeling delay flip-flops for binary (e.g., Alexander) phase detectors requires paying close attention to three important timing parameters: setup time, hold time, and clock edge-to-output (or briefly C2Q time). These parameters have a critical role in determining the status of the system on the circuit level. This study provided a guideline for designing an optimum DFF for an Alexander phase detector in a clock and data recovery circuit. Furthermore, it indicated DFF timing requirements for a high-speed phase detector in a clock and data recovery circuit. The CDR was also modeled by Verilog-A, and the results were compared with Simulink model achievements. Eventually designed in 45 nm CMOS technology, for 10 Gbps random sequence, the recovered clock contained 0.136 UI and 0.15 UI peak-to-peak jitter on the falling and rising edges respectively, and the lock time was 125 ns. The overall power dissipation was 21 mW from a 1 V supply voltage. Future work includes layout design and manufacturing of the proposed design

    Phase Locked Loop (PLL) based Clock and Data Recovery Circuits (CDR) using Calibrated Delay Flip Flop

    Get PDF
    A Delay Flip Flop (DFF) is used in the phase detector circuit of the clock and data recovery circuit. A DFF consists of the three important timing parameters: setup time, hold time, and clock-to-output delay. These timing parameters play a vital role in designing a system at the transistor level. This thesis paper explains the impact of metastablity on the clock and data recovery (CDR) system and the importance of calibrating the DFF using a metastable circuit to improve a system\u27s lock time and peak-to-peak jitter performance. The DFF was modeled in MATLAB Simulink software and calibrated by adjusting timing parameters. The CDR system was simulated in Simulink for three different cases: 1) equal setup and hold times, 2) setup time greater than the hold time, and 3) hold time greater than the setup time. The Simulink results were then compared with the Cadence simulation results, and it was observed that the calibration of DFF using a metastable circuit improved the CDR system\u27s lock time and jitter tolerance performance. The overall power dissipation of the designed CDR system was 2.4 mW from a 1 volt supply voltage
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore