2,293 research outputs found
Command & Control: Understanding, Denying and Detecting - A review of malware C2 techniques, detection and defences
In this survey, we first briefly review the current state of cyber attacks,
highlighting significant recent changes in how and why such attacks are
performed. We then investigate the mechanics of malware command and control
(C2) establishment: we provide a comprehensive review of the techniques used by
attackers to set up such a channel and to hide its presence from the attacked
parties and the security tools they use. We then switch to the defensive side
of the problem, and review approaches that have been proposed for the detection
and disruption of C2 channels. We also map such techniques to widely-adopted
security controls, emphasizing gaps or limitations (and success stories) in
current best practices.Comment: Work commissioned by CPNI, available at c2report.org. 38 pages.
Listing abstract compressed from version appearing in repor
Malware in the Future? Forecasting of Analyst Detection of Cyber Events
There have been extensive efforts in government, academia, and industry to
anticipate, forecast, and mitigate cyber attacks. A common approach is
time-series forecasting of cyber attacks based on data from network telescopes,
honeypots, and automated intrusion detection/prevention systems. This research
has uncovered key insights such as systematicity in cyber attacks. Here, we
propose an alternate perspective of this problem by performing forecasting of
attacks that are analyst-detected and -verified occurrences of malware. We call
these instances of malware cyber event data. Specifically, our dataset was
analyst-detected incidents from a large operational Computer Security Service
Provider (CSSP) for the U.S. Department of Defense, which rarely relies only on
automated systems. Our data set consists of weekly counts of cyber events over
approximately seven years. Since all cyber events were validated by analysts,
our dataset is unlikely to have false positives which are often endemic in
other sources of data. Further, the higher-quality data could be used for a
number for resource allocation, estimation of security resources, and the
development of effective risk-management strategies. We used a Bayesian State
Space Model for forecasting and found that events one week ahead could be
predicted. To quantify bursts, we used a Markov model. Our findings of
systematicity in analyst-detected cyber attacks are consistent with previous
work using other sources. The advanced information provided by a forecast may
help with threat awareness by providing a probable value and range for future
cyber events one week ahead. Other potential applications for cyber event
forecasting include proactive allocation of resources and capabilities for
cyber defense (e.g., analyst staffing and sensor configuration) in CSSPs.
Enhanced threat awareness may improve cybersecurity.Comment: Revised version resubmitted to journa
Learning Fast and Slow: PROPEDEUTICA for Real-time Malware Detection
In this paper, we introduce and evaluate PROPEDEUTICA, a novel methodology
and framework for efficient and effective real-time malware detection,
leveraging the best of conventional machine learning (ML) and deep learning
(DL) algorithms. In PROPEDEUTICA, all software processes in the system start
execution subjected to a conventional ML detector for fast classification. If a
piece of software receives a borderline classification, it is subjected to
further analysis via more performance expensive and more accurate DL methods,
via our newly proposed DL algorithm DEEPMALWARE. Further, we introduce delays
to the execution of software subjected to deep learning analysis as a way to
"buy time" for DL analysis and to rate-limit the impact of possible malware in
the system. We evaluated PROPEDEUTICA with a set of 9,115 malware samples and
877 commonly used benign software samples from various categories for the
Windows OS. Our results show that the false positive rate for conventional ML
methods can reach 20%, and for modern DL methods it is usually below 6%.
However, the classification time for DL can be 100X longer than conventional ML
methods. PROPEDEUTICA improved the detection F1-score from 77.54% (conventional
ML method) to 90.25%, and reduced the detection time by 54.86%. Further, the
percentage of software subjected to DL analysis was approximately 40% on
average. Further, the application of delays in software subjected to ML reduced
the detection time by approximately 10%. Finally, we found and discussed a
discrepancy between the detection accuracy offline (analysis after all traces
are collected) and on-the-fly (analysis in tandem with trace collection). Our
insights show that conventional ML and modern DL-based malware detectors in
isolation cannot meet the needs of efficient and effective malware detection:
high accuracy, low false positive rate, and short classification time.Comment: 17 pages, 7 figure
- …