2,528 research outputs found
A Line-Search Algorithm Inspired by the Adaptive Cubic Regularization Framework and Complexity Analysis
Adaptive regularized framework using cubics has emerged as an alternative to line-search and trust-region algorithms for smooth nonconvex optimization, with an optimal complexity amongst second-order methods. In this paper, we propose and analyze the use of an iteration dependent scaled norm in the adaptive regularized framework using cubics. Within such scaled norm, the obtained method behaves as a line-search algorithm along the quasi- Newton direction with a special backtracking strategy. Under appropriate assumptions, the new algorithm enjoys the same convergence and complexity properties as adaptive regularized algorithm using cubics. The complexity for finding an approximate first-order stationary point can be improved to be optimal whenever a second order version of the proposed algorithm is regarded. In a similar way, using the same scaled norm to define the trust-region neighborhood, we show that the trust-region algorithm behaves as a line-search algorithm. The good potential of the obtained algorithms is shown on a set of large scale optimization problems
Adaptive Regularization Algorithms with Inexact Evaluations for Nonconvex Optimization
A regularization algorithm using inexact function values and inexact
derivatives is proposed and its evaluation complexity analyzed. This algorithm
is applicable to unconstrained problems and to problems with inexpensive
constraints (that is constraints whose evaluation and enforcement has
negligible cost) under the assumption that the derivative of highest degree is
-H\"{o}lder continuous. It features a very flexible adaptive mechanism
for determining the inexactness which is allowed, at each iteration, when
computing objective function values and derivatives. The complexity analysis
covers arbitrary optimality order and arbitrary degree of available approximate
derivatives. It extends results of Cartis, Gould and Toint (2018) on the
evaluation complexity to the inexact case: if a th order minimizer is sought
using approximations to the first derivatives, it is proved that a suitable
approximate minimizer within is computed by the proposed algorithm
in at most iterations and at most
approximate
evaluations. An algorithmic variant, although more rigid in practice, can be
proved to find such an approximate minimizer in
evaluations.While
the proposed framework remains so far conceptual for high degrees and orders,
it is shown to yield simple and computationally realistic inexact methods when
specialized to the unconstrained and bound-constrained first- and second-order
cases. The deterministic complexity results are finally extended to the
stochastic context, yielding adaptive sample-size rules for subsampling methods
typical of machine learning.Comment: 32 page
A Generic Approach for Escaping Saddle points
A central challenge to using first-order methods for optimizing nonconvex
problems is the presence of saddle points. First-order methods often get stuck
at saddle points, greatly deteriorating their performance. Typically, to escape
from saddles one has to use second-order methods. However, most works on
second-order methods rely extensively on expensive Hessian-based computations,
making them impractical in large-scale settings. To tackle this challenge, we
introduce a generic framework that minimizes Hessian based computations while
at the same time provably converging to second-order critical points. Our
framework carefully alternates between a first-order and a second-order
subroutine, using the latter only close to saddle points, and yields
convergence results competitive to the state-of-the-art. Empirical results
suggest that our strategy also enjoys a good practical performance
A Subsampling Line-Search Method with Second-Order Results
In many contemporary optimization problems such as those arising in machine
learning, it can be computationally challenging or even infeasible to evaluate
an entire function or its derivatives. This motivates the use of stochastic
algorithms that sample problem data, which can jeopardize the guarantees
obtained through classical globalization techniques in optimization such as a
trust region or a line search. Using subsampled function values is particularly
challenging for the latter strategy, which relies upon multiple evaluations. On
top of that all, there has been an increasing interest for nonconvex
formulations of data-related problems, such as training deep learning models.
For such instances, one aims at developing methods that converge to
second-order stationary points quickly, i.e., escape saddle points efficiently.
This is particularly delicate to ensure when one only accesses subsampled
approximations of the objective and its derivatives.
In this paper, we describe a stochastic algorithm based on negative curvature
and Newton-type directions that are computed for a subsampling model of the
objective. A line-search technique is used to enforce suitable decrease for
this model, and for a sufficiently large sample, a similar amount of reduction
holds for the true objective. By using probabilistic reasoning, we can then
obtain worst-case complexity guarantees for our framework, leading us to
discuss appropriate notions of stationarity in a subsampling context. Our
analysis encompasses the deterministic regime, and allows us to identify
sampling requirements for second-order line-search paradigms. As we illustrate
through real data experiments, these worst-case estimates need not be satisfied
for our method to be competitive with first-order strategies in practice
- …