2,821 research outputs found
Word Sense Disambiguation: A Structured Learning Perspective
This paper explores the application of structured learning methods (SLMs) to word sense disambiguation (WSD). On one hand, the semantic dependencies between polysemous words in the sentence can be encoded in SLMs. On the other hand, SLMs obtained significant achievements in natural language processing, and so it is a natural idea to apply them to WSD. However, there are many theoretical and practical problems when SLMs are applied to WSD, due to characteristics of WSD. Beginning with the method based on hidden Markov model, this paper proposes for the first time a comprehensive and unified solution for WSD based on maximum entropy Markov model, conditional random field and tree-structured conditional random field, and reduces the time complexity and running time of the proposed methods to a reasonable level by beam search, approximate training, and parallel training. The update of models brings performance improvement, the introduction of one step dependency improves performance by 1--5 percent, the adoption of non-independent features improves performance by 2--3 percent, and the extension of underlying structure to dependency parsing tree improves performance by about 1 percent. On the English all-words WSD dataset of Senseval-2004, the method based on tree-structured conditional random field outperforms the best attendee system significantly. Nevertheless, almost all machine learning methods suffer from data sparseness due to the scarcity of sense tagged data, and so do SLMs. Besides improving structured learning methods according to the characteristics of WSD, another approach to improve disambiguation performance is to mine disambiguation knowledge from all kinds of sources, such as Wikipedia, parallel corpus, and to alleviate knowledge acquisition bottleneck of WSD
Distinguishing Word Senses in Untagged Text
This paper describes an experimental comparison of three unsupervised
learning algorithms that distinguish the sense of an ambiguous word in untagged
text. The methods described in this paper, McQuitty's similarity analysis,
Ward's minimum-variance method, and the EM algorithm, assign each instance of
an ambiguous word to a known sense definition based solely on the values of
automatically identifiable features in text. These methods and feature sets are
found to be more successful in disambiguating nouns rather than adjectives or
verbs. Overall, the most accurate of these procedures is McQuitty's similarity
analysis in combination with a high dimensional feature set.Comment: 11 pages, latex, uses aclap.st
Disambiguation strategies for cross-language information retrieval
This paper gives an overview of tools and methods for Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) that are developed within the Twenty-One project. The tools and methods are evaluated with the TREC CLIR task document collection using Dutch queries on the English document base. The main issue addressed here is an evaluation of two approaches to disambiguation. The underlying question is whether a lot of effort should be put in finding the correct translation for each query term before searching, or whether searching with more than one possible translation leads to better results? The experimental study suggests that the quality of search methods is more important than the quality of disambiguation methods. Good retrieval methods are able to disambiguate translated queries implicitly during searching
Similarity-Based Models of Word Cooccurrence Probabilities
In many applications of natural language processing (NLP) it is necessary to
determine the likelihood of a given word combination. For example, a speech
recognizer may need to determine which of the two word combinations ``eat a
peach'' and ``eat a beach'' is more likely. Statistical NLP methods determine
the likelihood of a word combination from its frequency in a training corpus.
However, the nature of language is such that many word combinations are
infrequent and do not occur in any given corpus. In this work we propose a
method for estimating the probability of such previously unseen word
combinations using available information on ``most similar'' words.
We describe probabilistic word association models based on distributional
word similarity, and apply them to two tasks, language modeling and pseudo-word
disambiguation. In the language modeling task, a similarity-based model is used
to improve probability estimates for unseen bigrams in a back-off language
model. The similarity-based method yields a 20% perplexity improvement in the
prediction of unseen bigrams and statistically significant reductions in
speech-recognition error.
We also compare four similarity-based estimation methods against back-off and
maximum-likelihood estimation methods on a pseudo-word sense disambiguation
task in which we controlled for both unigram and bigram frequency to avoid
giving too much weight to easy-to-disambiguate high-frequency configurations.
The similarity-based methods perform up to 40% better on this particular task.Comment: 26 pages, 5 figure
Distantly Labeling Data for Large Scale Cross-Document Coreference
Cross-document coreference, the problem of resolving entity mentions across
multi-document collections, is crucial to automated knowledge base construction
and data mining tasks. However, the scarcity of large labeled data sets has
hindered supervised machine learning research for this task. In this paper we
develop and demonstrate an approach based on ``distantly-labeling'' a data set
from which we can train a discriminative cross-document coreference model. In
particular we build a dataset of more than a million people mentions extracted
from 3.5 years of New York Times articles, leverage Wikipedia for distant
labeling with a generative model (and measure the reliability of such
labeling); then we train and evaluate a conditional random field coreference
model that has factors on cross-document entities as well as mention-pairs.
This coreference model obtains high accuracy in resolving mentions and entities
that are not present in the training data, indicating applicability to
non-Wikipedia data. Given the large amount of data, our work is also an
exercise demonstrating the scalability of our approach.Comment: 16 pages, submitted to ECML 201
Named Entity Extraction and Disambiguation: The Reinforcement Effect.
Named entity extraction and disambiguation have received much attention in recent years. Typical fields addressing these topics are information retrieval, natural language processing, and semantic web. Although these topics are highly dependent, almost no existing works examine this dependency. It is the aim of this paper to examine the dependency and show how one affects the other, and vice versa. We conducted experiments with a set of descriptions of holiday homes with the aim to extract and disambiguate toponyms as a representative example of named entities. We experimented with three approaches for disambiguation with the purpose to infer the country of the holiday home. We examined how the effectiveness of extraction influences the effectiveness of disambiguation, and reciprocally, how filtering out ambiguous names (an activity that depends on the disambiguation process) improves the effectiveness of extraction. Since this, in turn, may improve the effectiveness of disambiguation again, it shows that extraction and disambiguation may reinforce each other.\u
- …