3,981 research outputs found

    A Geometric Derivation of the Irwin-Hall Distribution

    Get PDF
    The Irwin-Hall distribution is the distribution of the sum of a finite number of independent identically distributed uniform random variables on the unit interval. Many applications arise since round-off errors have a transformed Irwin-Hall distribution and the distribution supplies spline approximations to normal distributions. We review some of the distribution’s history. The present derivation is very transparent, since it is geometric and explicitly uses the inclusion-exclusion principle. In certain special cases, the derivation can be extended to linear combinations of independent uniform random variables on other intervals of finite length.The derivation adds to the literature about methodologies for finding distributions of sums of random variables, especially distributions that have domains with boundaries so that the inclusion-exclusion principle might be employed

    CLT for non-Hermitian random band matrices with variance profiles

    Full text link
    We show that the fluctuations of the linear eigenvalue statistics of a non-Hermitian random band matrix of increasing bandwidth bnb_{n} with a continuous variance profile wν(x)w_{\nu}(x) converges to a N(0,σf2(ν))N(0,\sigma_{f}^{2}(\nu)), where ν=limn(2bn/n)[0,1]\nu=\lim_{n\to\infty}(2b_{n}/n)\in [0,1] and ff is the test function. When ν(0,1]\nu\in (0,1], we obtain an explicit formula for σf2(ν)\sigma_{f}^{2}(\nu), which depends on ff, and variance profile wνw_{\nu}. When ν=1\nu=1, the formula is consistent with Rider, and Silverstein (2006). We also independently compute an explicit formula for σf2(0)\sigma_{f}^{2}(0) i.e., when the bandwidth bnb_{n} grows slower compared to nn. In addition, we show that σf2(ν)σf2(0)\sigma_{f}^{2}(\nu)\to \sigma_{f}^{2}(0) as ν0\nu\downarrow 0.Comment: Typos corrected; a few more explanations and a couple of pictures have been adde

    The SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey. Paper III: Astrometry

    Get PDF
    In this, the third in a series of three papers concerning the SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey, we describe the astrometric properties of the database. We describe the algorithms employed in the derivation of the astrometric parameters of the data, and demonstrate their accuracies by comparison with external datasets using the first release of data, the South Galactic Cap survey. We show that the celestial coordinates, which are tied to the International Celestial Reference Frame via the Tycho-2 reference catalogue, are accurate to better than +/- 0.2 arcsec at J,R=19,18 rising to +/- 0.3 arcsec at J,R=22,21 with positional dependent systematic effects from bright to faint magnitudes at the +/- 0.1 arcsec level. The proper motion measurements are shown to be accurate to typically +/- 10 mas/yr at J,R=19,18 rising to +/- 50 mas/yr at J,R=22,21 and are tied to zero using the extragalactic reference frame. We show that the zeropoint errors in the proper motions are 17 and are no larger than 10 mas/yr for R < 17 mas/yr.Comment: 15 pages, 12 figures; accepted for publication in MNRA

    The total assessment profile, volume 2

    Get PDF
    Appendices are presented which include discussions of interest formulas, factors in regionalization, parametric modeling of discounted benefit-sacrifice streams, engineering economic calculations, and product innovation. For Volume 1, see

    Analysis of Neptune's 2017 Bright Equatorial Storm

    Get PDF
    We report the discovery of a large (\sim8500 km diameter) infrared-bright storm at Neptune's equator in June 2017. We tracked the storm over a period of 7 months with high-cadence infrared snapshot imaging, carried out on 14 nights at the 10 meter Keck II telescope and 17 nights at the Shane 120 inch reflector at Lick Observatory. The cloud feature was larger and more persistent than any equatorial clouds seen before on Neptune, remaining intermittently active from at least 10 June to 31 December 2017. Our Keck and Lick observations were augmented by very high-cadence images from the amateur community, which permitted the determination of accurate drift rates for the cloud feature. Its zonal drift speed was variable from 10 June to at least 25 July, but remained a constant 237.4±0.2237.4 \pm 0.2 m s1^{-1} from 30 September until at least 15 November. The pressure of the cloud top was determined from radiative transfer calculations to be 0.3-0.6 bar; this value remained constant over the course of the observations. Multiple cloud break-up events, in which a bright cloud band wrapped around Neptune's equator, were observed over the course of our observations. No "dark spot" vortices were seen near the equator in HST imaging on 6 and 7 October. The size and pressure of the storm are consistent with moist convection or a planetary-scale wave as the energy source of convective upwelling, but more modeling is required to determine the driver of this equatorial disturbance as well as the triggers for and dynamics of the observed cloud break-up events.Comment: 42 pages, 14 figures, 6 tables; Accepted to Icaru
    corecore