Model Checking an Epistemic mu-calculus with Synchronous and Perfect Recall Semantics

We identify a subproblem of the model-checking problem for the epistemic \mu-calculus which is decidable. Formulas in the instances of this subproblem allow free variables within the scope of epistemic modalities in a restricted form that avoids embodying any form of common knowledge. Our subproblem subsumes known decidable fragments of epistemic CTL/LTL, may express winning strategies in two-player games with one player having imperfect information and non-observable objectives, and, with a suitable encoding, decidable instances of the model-checking problem for ATLiR.Comment: 10 pages, Poster presentation at TARK 2013 (arXiv:1310.6382) http://www.tark.or

The atnext/atprevious hierarchy on the starfree languages

The temporal logic operators atnext and atprevious are alternatives for the operators until and since. P atnext Q has the meaning: at the next position in the future where Q holds it holds P. We define an asymmetric but natural notion of depth for the expressions of this linear temporal logic. The sequence of classes at_n of languages expressible via such depth-n expressions gives a parametrization of the starfree regular languages which we call the atnext/atprevious hierarchy, or simply at hierarchy. It turns out that the at hierarchy equals the hierarchy given by the n-fold weakly iterated block product of DA. It is shown that the at hierarchy is situated properly between the until/since and the dot-depth hierarchy

Temporal Reasoning without Transitive Tables

rapport interneRepresenting and reasoning about qualitative temporal information is an essential part of many artificial intelligence tasks. Lots of models have been proposed in the litterature for representing such temporal information. All derive from a point-based or an interval-based framework. One fundamental reasoning task that arises in applications of these frameworks is given by the following scheme: given possibly indefinite and incomplete knowledge of the binary relationships between some temporal objects, find the consistent scenarii between all these objects. All these models require transitive tables --- or similarly inference rules--- for solving such tasks. We have defined an alternative model, S-languages - to represent qualitative temporal information, based on the only two relations of \emph{precedence} and \emph{simultaneity}. In this paper, we show how this model enables to avoid transitive tables or inference rules to handle this kind of problem

A Branching Distributed Temporal Logic for Reasoning about Quantum State Transformations

The Distributed Temporal Logic DTL allows one to reason about temporal properties of a distributed system from the local point of view of the system's agents, which are assumed to execute independently and to interact by means of event sharing. In this paper, we introduce the Quantum Branching Distributed Temporal Logic QBDTL, a variant of DTL able to represent quantum state transformations in an abstract, qualitative way. In QBDTL, each agent represents a distinct quantum bit (the unit of quantum information theory), which evolves by means of quantum transformations and possibly interacts with other agents, and n-ary quantum operators act as communication/synchronization points between agents. We endow QBDTL with a DTL-style semantics, which fits the intrinsically distributed nature of quantum computing, we formalize a labeled deduction system for QBDTL, and we prove the soundness and completeness of this deduction system with respect to the given semantics. We give a number of examples and, finally, we discuss possible extensions of our logic in order to reason about entangle-ment phenomena