A Guided Neighborhood Search Applied to the Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem

The classic vehicle routing problem considers the distribution of goods to geographically scattered customers from a central depot using a homogeneous fleet of vehicles with finite capacity. Each customer has a known demand and can be visited by exactly one vehicle. Each vehicle services the assigned customers in such a way that all customers are fully supplied and the total service does not exceed the vehicle capacity. In the split delivery vehicle routing problem, a customer can be visited by more than one vehicle, i.e., a customer demand can be split between various vehicles. Allowing split deliveries has been proven to potentially reduce the operational costs of the fleet. This study efficiently solves the split delivery vehicle routing problem using three new approaches. In the first approach, the problem is solved in two stages. During the first stage, an initial solution is found by means of a greedy approach that can produce high quality solutions comparable to those obtained with existing sophisticated approaches. The greedy approach is based on a novel concept called the route angle control measure that helps to produce spatially thin routes and avoids crossing routes. In the second stage, this constructive approach is extended to an iterative approach using adaptive memory concepts, and then a variable neighborhood descent process is added to improve the solution obtained. A new solution diversification scheme is presented in the second approach based on concentric rings centered at the depot that partitions the original problem. The resulting sub-problems are then solved using the greedy approach with route angle control measures. Different ring settings produce varied partitions and thus different solutions to the original problem are obtained and improved via a variable neighborhood descent. The third approach is a learning procedure based on a set or population of solutions. Those solutions are used to find attractive attributes and construct new solutions within a tabu search framework. As the search progresses, the existing population evolves, better solutions are included in it whereas bad solutions are removed from it. The initial set is constructed using the greedy approach with the route angle control measure whereas new solutions are created using an adaptation of the well known savings algorithm of Clarke and Wright (1964) and improved by means of an enhanced version of the variable neighborhood descent process. The proposed approaches are tested on benchmark instances and results are compared with existing implementations

Variable Neighborhood Descent Matheuristic for the Drone Routing Problem with Beehives Sharing

In contemporary urban logistics, drones will become a preferred transportation mode for last-mile deliveries, as they have shown commercial potential and triple-bottom-line performance. Drones, in fact, address many challenges related to congestion and emissions and can streamline the last leg of the supply chain, while maintaining economic performance. Despite the common conviction that drones will reshape the future of deliveries, numerous hurdles prevent practical implementation of this futuristic vision. The sharing economy, referred to as a collaborative business model that foster sharing, exchanging and renting resources, could lead to operational improvements and enhance the cost control ability and the flexibility of companies using drones. For instance, the Amazon patent for drone beehives, which are fulfilment centers where drones can be restocked before flying out again for another delivery, could be established as a shared delivery systems where different freight carriers jointly deliver goods to customers. Only a few studies have addressed the problem of operating such facilities providing services to retail companies. In this paper, we formulate the problem as a deterministic location-routing model and derive its robust counterpart under the travel time uncertainty. To tackle the computational complexity of the model caused by the non-linear energy consumption rates in drone battery, we propose a tailored matheuristic combining variable neighborhood descent with a cut generation approach. The computational experiments show the efficiency of the solution approach especially compared to the Gurobi solver

Distance-constrained vehicle routing problem: exact and approximate solution (mathematical programming)

This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University.The asymmetric distance-constrained vehicle routing problem (ADVRP) looks at finding vehicle tours to connect all customers with a depot, such that the total distance is minimised; each customer is visited once by one vehicle; every tour starts and ends at a depot; and the travelled distance by each vehicle is less than or equal to the given maximum value. We present three basic results in this thesis. In the first one, we present a general flow-based formulation to ADVRP. It is suitable for symmetric and asymmetric instances. It has been compared with the adapted Bus School Routing formulation and appears to solve the ADVRP faster. Comparisons are performed on random test instances with up to 200 customers. We reach a conclusion that our general formulation outperforms the adapted one. Moreover, it finds the optimal solution for small test instances quickly. For large instances, there is a high probability that an optimal solution can be found or at least improve upon the value of the best feasible solution found so far, compared to the other formulation which stops because of the time condition. This formulation is more general than Kara formulation since it does not require the distance matrix to satisfy the triangle inequality. The second result improves and modifies an old branch-and-bound method suggested by Laporte et al. in 1987. It is based on reformulating a distance-constrained vehicle routing problem into a travelling salesman problem and uses the assignment problem as a lower bounding procedure. In addition, its algorithm uses the best-first strategy and new branching rules. Since this method was fast but memory consuming, it would stop before optimality is proven. Therefore, we introduce randomness in choosing the node of the search tree in case we have more than one choice (usually we choose the smallest objective function). If an optimal solution is not found, then restart is required due to memory issues, so we restart our procedure. In that way, we get a multistart branch and bound method. Computational experiments show that we are able to exactly solve large test instances with up to 1000 customers. As far as we know, those instances are much larger than instances considered for other VRP models and exact solution approaches from recent literature. So, despite its simplicity, this proposed algorithm is capable of solving the largest instances ever solved in literature. Moreover, this approach is general and may be used in solving other types of vehicle routing problems. In the third result, we use VNS as a heuristic to find the best feasible solution for groups of instances. We wanted to determine how far the difference is between the best feasible solution obtained by VNS and the value of optimal solution in order to use the output of VNS as an initial feasible solution (upper bound procedure) to improve our multistart method. Unfortunately, based on the search strategy (best first search), using a heuristic to find an initial feasible solution is not useful. The reason for this is because the branch and bound is able to find the first feasible solution quickly. In other words, in our method using a good initial feasible solution as an upper bound will not increase the speed of the search. However, this would be different for the depth first search. However, we found a big gap between VNS feasible solution and an optimal solution, so VNS can not be used alone unless for large test instances when other exact methods are not able to find any feasible solution because of memory or stopping conditions

Profitable Vehicle Routing Problem with Multiple Trips: Modeling and Variable Neighborhood Descent Algorithm

Abstract In this paper, we tackle a new variant of the Veh icle Routing Problem (VRP) which comb ines two known variants namely the Profitable VRP and the VRP with Mult iple Trips. The resulting problem may be called the Profitable Vehicle Routing Problem with Multiple Trips. The main purpose is to cover and solve a more co mplex realistic situation of the distribution transportation. The profitability concept arises when only a subset of customers can be served due to the lack of means or for insufficiency of the offer. In this case, each customer is associated to an economical profit wh ich will be integrated to the objective function. The latter contains at hand the total collected profit minus the transportation costs. Each vehicle is allowed to perform several routes under a strict workday duration limit. This problem has a very practical interest especially for daily distribution schedules with limited vehicle fleets and short course transportation networks. We point out a new discursive approach for p rofits quantificat ion wh ich is mo re significant than those existing in the literature. We propose four equivalent mathematical formu lations for the problem which are tested and compared using CPLEX solver on small-size instances. Optimal solutions are identified. For large-size instance, two constructive heuristics are proposed and enhanced using Hill Climbing and Variable Neighborhood Descent algorithm based on a specific three-arrays-based coding structure. Finally, extensive co mputational experiments are performed including randomly generated instances and an extended and adapted benchmark fro m literature showing very satisfactory results

The stochastic vehicle routing problem : a literature review, part II : solution methods

Building on the work of Gendreau et al. (Oper Res 44(3):469–477, 1996), and complementing the first part of this survey, we review the solution methods used for the past 20 years in the scientific literature on stochastic vehicle routing problems (SVRP). We describe the methods and indicate how they are used when dealing with stochastic vehicle routing problems. Keywords: vehicle routing (VRP), stochastic programmingm, SVRPpublishedVersio