A novel TOPSIS–CBR goal programming approach to sustainable healthcare treatment

Cancer is one of the most common diseases worldwide and its treatment is a complex and time-consuming process. Specifically, prostate cancer as the most common cancer among male population has received the attentions of many researchers. Oncologists and medical physicists usually rely on their past experience and expertise to prescribe the dose plan for cancer treatment. The main objective of dose planning process is to deliver high dose to the cancerous cells and simultaneously minimize the side effects of the treatment. In this article, a novel TOPSIS case based reasoning goal-programming approach has been proposed to optimize the dose plan for prostate cancer treatment. Firstly, a hybrid retrieval process TOPSIS–CBR [technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and case based reasoning (CBR)] is used to capture the expertise and experience of oncologists. Thereafter, the dose plans of retrieved cases are adjusted using goal-programming mathematical model. This approach will not only help oncologists to make a better trade-off between different conflicting decision making criteria but will also deliver a high dose to the cancerous cells with minimal and necessary effect on surrounding organs at risk. The efficacy of proposed method is tested on a real data set collected from Nottingham City Hospital using leave-one-out strategy. In most of the cases treatment plans generated by the proposed method is coherent with the dose plan prescribed by an experienced oncologist or even better. Developed decision support system can assist both new and experienced oncologists in the treatment planning process

Knowledge-light adaptation approaches in case-based reasoning for radiotherapy treatment planning

Objective: Radiotherapy treatment planning aims at delivering a sufficient radiation dose to cancerous tumour cells while sparing healthy organs in the tumour-surrounding area. It is a time-consuming trial-and-error process that requires the expertise of a group of medical experts including oncologists and medical physicists and can take from 2 to 3 h to a few days. Our objective is to improve the performance of our previously built case-based reasoning (CBR) system for brain tumour radiotherapy treatment planning. In this system, a treatment plan for a new patient is retrieved from a case base containing patient cases treated in the past and their treatment plans. However, this system does not perform any adaptation, which is needed to account for any difference between the new and retrieved cases. Generally, the adaptation phase is considered to be intrinsically knowledge-intensive and domain-dependent. Therefore, an adaptation often requires a large amount of domain-specific knowledge, which can be difficult to acquire and often is not readily available. In this study, we investigate approaches to adaptation that do not require much domain knowledge, referred to as knowledge-light adaptation. Methodology: We developed two adaptation approaches: adaptation based on machine-learning tools and adaptation-guided retrieval. They were used to adapt the beam number and beam angles suggested in the retrieved case. Two machine-learning tools, neural networks and naive Bayes classifier, were used in the adaptation to learn how the difference in attribute values between the retrieved and new cases affects the output of these two cases. The adaptation-guided retrieval takes into consideration not only the similarity between the new and retrieved cases, but also how to adapt the retrieved case. Results: The research was carried out in collaboration with medical physicists at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, UK. All experiments were performed using real-world brain cancer patient cases treated with three-dimensional (3D)-conformal radiotherapy. Neural networks-based adaptation improved the success rate of the CBR system with no adaptation by 12%. However, naive Bayes classifier did not improve the current retrieval results as it did not consider the interplay among attributes. The adaptation-guided retrieval of the case for beam number improved the success rate of the CBR system by 29%. However, it did not demonstrate good performance for the beam angle adaptation. Its success rate was 29% versus 39% when no adaptation was performed. Conclusions: The obtained empirical results demonstrate that the proposed adaptation methods improve the performance of the existing CBR system in recommending the number of beams to use. However, we also conclude that to be effective, the proposed adaptation of beam angles requires a large number of relevant cases in the case base

A case-based reasoning system for radiotherapy treatment planning for brain cancer

In this thesis, a novel case-based reasoning (CBR) approach to radiotherapy treatment planning for brain cancer patients is presented. In radiotherapy, tumour cells are destroyed using ionizing radiation. For each patient, a treatment plan is generated that describes how the radiation should be applied in order to deliver a tumouricidal radiation dose while avoiding irradiation of healthy tissue and organs at risk in the vicinity of the tumour. The traditional, manual trial and error approach is a time-consuming process that depends on the experience and intuitive knowledge of medical physicists. CBR is an artificial intelligence methodology, which attempts to solve new problems based on the solutions of previously solved similar problems. In this research work, CBR is used to generate the parameters of a treatment plan by capturing the subjective and intuitive knowledge of expert medical physicists stored intrinsically in the treatment plans of similar patients treated in the past. This work focusses on the retrieval stage of the CBR system, in which given a new patient case, the most similar case in the archived case base is retrieved along with its treatment plan. A number of research issues that arise from using CBR for radiotherapy treatment planning for brain cancer are addressed. Different approaches to similarity calculation between cases are investigated and compared, in particular, the weighted nearest neighbour similarity measure and a novel non-linear, fuzzy similarity measure designed for our CBR system. A local case attribute weighting scheme has been developed that uses rules to assign attribute weights based on the values of the attributes in the new case and is compared to global attribute weighting, where the attribute weights remain constant for all target cases. A multi-phase case retrieval approach is introduced in which each phase considers one part of the solution. In addition, a framework developed for the imputation of missing values in the case base is described. The research was carried out in collaboration with medical physicists at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, UK. The performance of the developed methodologies was tested using brain cancer patient cases obtained from the City Hospital. The results obtained show that the success rate of the retrieval mechanism provides a good starting point for adaptation, the next phase in development for the CBR system. The developed automated CBR system will assist medical physicists in quickly generating treatment plans and can also serve as a teaching and training aid for junior, inexperienced medical physicists. In addition, the developed methods are generic in nature and can be adapted to be used in other CBR or intelligent decision support systems for other complex, real world, problem domains that highly depend on subjective and intuitive knowledge

A novel case-based reasoning approach to radiotherapy dose planning

In this thesis, novel Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) methods were developed to be included in CBRDP (Case-Based Reasoning Dose Planner) -an adaptive decision support system for radiotherapy dose planning. CBR is an artificial intelligence methodology which solves new problems by retrieving solutions to previously solved similar problems stored in a case base. The focus of this research is on dose planning for prostate cancer patients. The records of patients successfully treated in the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, UK, were stored in a case base and were exploited using case-based reasoning for future decision making. After each successful run of the system, a group based Simulated Annealing (SA) algorithm automatically searches for an optimal/near optimal combination of feature weights to be used in the future retrieval process of CBR. A number of research issues associated with the prostate cancer dose planning problem and the use of CBR are addressed including: (a) trade-off between the benefit of delivering a higher dose of radiation to cancer cells and the risk to damage surrounding organs, (b) deciding when and how much to violate the limitations of dose limits imposed to surrounding organs, (c) fusion of knowledge and experience gained over time in treating patients similar to the new one, (d) incorporation of the 5 years Progression Free Probability and success rate in the decision making process and (e) hybridisation of CBR with a novel group based simulated annealing algorithm to update knowledge/experience gained in treating patients over time. The efficiency of the proposed system was validated using real data sets collected from the Nottingham University Hospitals. Experiments based on a leave-one-out strategy demonstrated that for most of the patients, the dose plans generated by our approach are coherent with the dose plans prescribed by an experienced oncologist or even better. This system may play a vital role to assist the oncologist in making a better decision in less time; it incorporates the success rate of previously treated similar patients in the dose planning for a new patient and it can also be used in teaching and training processes. In addition, the developed method is generic in nature and can be used to solve similar non-linear real world complex problems

A case-based reasoning system for radiotherapy treatment planning for brain cancer

In this thesis, a novel case-based reasoning (CBR) approach to radiotherapy treatment planning for brain cancer patients is presented. In radiotherapy, tumour cells are destroyed using ionizing radiation. For each patient, a treatment plan is generated that describes how the radiation should be applied in order to deliver a tumouricidal radiation dose while avoiding irradiation of healthy tissue and organs at risk in the vicinity of the tumour. The traditional, manual trial and error approach is a time-consuming process that depends on the experience and intuitive knowledge of medical physicists. CBR is an artificial intelligence methodology, which attempts to solve new problems based on the solutions of previously solved similar problems. In this research work, CBR is used to generate the parameters of a treatment plan by capturing the subjective and intuitive knowledge of expert medical physicists stored intrinsically in the treatment plans of similar patients treated in the past. This work focusses on the retrieval stage of the CBR system, in which given a new patient case, the most similar case in the archived case base is retrieved along with its treatment plan. A number of research issues that arise from using CBR for radiotherapy treatment planning for brain cancer are addressed. Different approaches to similarity calculation between cases are investigated and compared, in particular, the weighted nearest neighbour similarity measure and a novel non-linear, fuzzy similarity measure designed for our CBR system. A local case attribute weighting scheme has been developed that uses rules to assign attribute weights based on the values of the attributes in the new case and is compared to global attribute weighting, where the attribute weights remain constant for all target cases. A multi-phase case retrieval approach is introduced in which each phase considers one part of the solution. In addition, a framework developed for the imputation of missing values in the case base is described. The research was carried out in collaboration with medical physicists at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, UK. The performance of the developed methodologies was tested using brain cancer patient cases obtained from the City Hospital. The results obtained show that the success rate of the retrieval mechanism provides a good starting point for adaptation, the next phase in development for the CBR system. The developed automated CBR system will assist medical physicists in quickly generating treatment plans and can also serve as a teaching and training aid for junior, inexperienced medical physicists. In addition, the developed methods are generic in nature and can be adapted to be used in other CBR or intelligent decision support systems for other complex, real world, problem domains that highly depend on subjective and intuitive knowledge

A novel combination of Cased-Based Reasoning and Multi Criteria Decision Making approach to radiotherapy dose planning

In this thesis, a set of novel approaches has been developed by integration of Cased-Based Reasoning (CBR) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques. Its purpose is to design a support system to assist oncologists with decision making about the dose planning for radiotherapy treatment with a focus on radiotherapy for prostate cancer. CBR, an artificial intelligence approach, is a general paradigm to reasoning from past experiences. It retrieves previous cases similar to a new case and exploits the successful past solutions to provide a suggested solution for the new case. The case pool used in this research is a dataset consisting of features and details related to successfully treated patients in Nottingham University Hospital. In a typical run of prostate cancer radiotherapy simple CBR, a new case is selected and thereafter based on the features available at our data set the most similar case to the new case is obtained and its solution is prescribed to the new case. However, there are a number of deficiencies associated with this approach. Firstly, in a real-life scenario, the medical team considers multiple factors rather than just the similarity between two cases and not always the most similar case provides with the most appropriate solution. Thus, in this thesis, the cases with high similarity to a new case have been evaluated with the application of the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). This approach takes into account multiple criteria besides similarity to prescribe a final solution. Moreover, the obtained dose plans were optimised through a Goal Programming mathematical model to improve the results. By incorporating oncologists’ experiences about violating the conventionally available dose limits a system was devised to manage the trade-off between treatment risk for sensitive organs and necessary actions to effectively eradicate cancer cells. Additionally, the success rate of the treatment, the 2-years cancer free possibility, has a vital role in the efficiency of the prescribed solutions. To consider the success rate, as well as uncertainty involved in human judgment about the values of different features of radiotherapy Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) based on grey numbers, was used to assess the efficiency of different treatment plans on an input and output based approach. In order to deal with limitations involved in DEA regarding the number of inputs and outputs, we presented an approach for Factor Analysis based on Principal Components to utilize the grey numbers. Finally, to improve the CBR base of the system, we applied Grey Relational Analysis and Gaussian distant based CBR along with features weight selection through Genetic Algorithm to better handle the non-linearity exists within the problem features and the high number of features. Finally, the efficiency of each system has been validated through leave-one-out strategy and the real dataset. The results demonstrated the efficiency of the proposed approaches and capability of the system to assist the medical planning team. Furthermore, the integrated approaches developed within this thesis can be also applied to solve other real-life problems in various domains other than healthcare such as supply chain management, manufacturing, business success prediction and performance evaluation

A novel case-based reasoning approach to radiotherapy dose planning

In this thesis, novel Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) methods were developed to be included in CBRDP (Case-Based Reasoning Dose Planner) -an adaptive decision support system for radiotherapy dose planning. CBR is an artificial intelligence methodology which solves new problems by retrieving solutions to previously solved similar problems stored in a case base. The focus of this research is on dose planning for prostate cancer patients. The records of patients successfully treated in the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, UK, were stored in a case base and were exploited using case-based reasoning for future decision making. After each successful run of the system, a group based Simulated Annealing (SA) algorithm automatically searches for an optimal/near optimal combination of feature weights to be used in the future retrieval process of CBR. A number of research issues associated with the prostate cancer dose planning problem and the use of CBR are addressed including: (a) trade-off between the benefit of delivering a higher dose of radiation to cancer cells and the risk to damage surrounding organs, (b) deciding when and how much to violate the limitations of dose limits imposed to surrounding organs, (c) fusion of knowledge and experience gained over time in treating patients similar to the new one, (d) incorporation of the 5 years Progression Free Probability and success rate in the decision making process and (e) hybridisation of CBR with a novel group based simulated annealing algorithm to update knowledge/experience gained in treating patients over time. The efficiency of the proposed system was validated using real data sets collected from the Nottingham University Hospitals. Experiments based on a leave-one-out strategy demonstrated that for most of the patients, the dose plans generated by our approach are coherent with the dose plans prescribed by an experienced oncologist or even better. This system may play a vital role to assist the oncologist in making a better decision in less time; it incorporates the success rate of previously treated similar patients in the dose planning for a new patient and it can also be used in teaching and training processes. In addition, the developed method is generic in nature and can be used to solve similar non-linear real world complex problems

Improving Retrieval Performance of Case Based Reasoning Systems by Fuzzy Clustering

Case-based reasoning (CBR), which is a classical reasoning methodology, has been put to use. Its application has allowed significant progress in resolving problems related to the diagnosis, therapy, and prediction of diseases. However, this methodology has shown some complicated problems that must be resolved, including determining a representation form for the case (complexity, uncertainty, and vagueness of medical information), preventing the case base from the infinite growth of generated medical information and selecting the best retrieval technique. These limitations have pushed researchers to think about other ways of solving problems, and we are recently witnessing the integration of CBR with other techniques such as data mining. In this article, we develop a new approach integrating clustering (Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) and K-Means) in the CBR cycle. Clustering is one of the crucial challenges and has been successfully used in many areas to develop innate structures and hidden patterns for data grouping [1]. The objective of the proposed approach is to solve the limitations of CBR and improve it, particularly in the search for similar cases (retrieval step). The approach is tested with the publicly available immunotherapy dataset. The results of the experimentations show that the integration of the FCM algorithm in the retrieval step reduces the search space (the large volume of information), resolves the problem of the vagueness of medical information, speeds up the calculation and response time, and increases the search efficiency, which further improves the performance of the retrieval step and, consequently, the CBR system

Fuzzy logic: A “simple” solution for complexities in neurosciences?

Background: Fuzzy logic is a multi-valued logic which is similar to human thinking and interpretation. It has the potential of combining human heuristics into computer-assisted decision making, which is applicable to individual patients as it takes into account all the factors and complexities of individuals. Fuzzy logic has been applied in all disciplines of medicine in some form and recently its applicability in neurosciences has also gained momentum.Methods: This review focuses on the use of this concept in various branches of neurosciences including basic neuroscience, neurology, neurosurgery, psychiatry and psychology.Results: The applicability of fuzzy logic is not limited to research related to neuroanatomy, imaging nerve fibers and understanding neurophysiology, but it is also a sensitive and specific tool for interpretation of EEGs, EMGs and MRIs and an effective controller device in intensive care units. It has been used for risk stratification of stroke, diagnosis of different psychiatric illnesses and even planning neurosurgical procedures.Conclusions: In the future, fuzzy logic has the potential of becoming the basis of all clinical decision making and our understanding of neurosciences