A fresh perspective on canonical extensions for bounded lattices

This paper presents a novel treatment of the canonical extension of a bounded lattice, in the spirit of thetheory of natural dualities. At the level of objects, this can be achieved by exploiting the topological representation due to M. Ploscica, and the canonical extension can be obtained in the same manner as can be done in the distributive case by exploiting Priestley duality. To encompass both objects and morphismsthe Ploscica representation is replaced by a duality due to Allwein and Hartonas, recast in the style of Ploscica's paper. This leads to a construction of canonical extension valid for all bounded lattices,which is shown to be functorial, with the property that the canonical extension functor decomposes asthe composite of two functors, each of which acts on morphisms by composition, in the manner of hom-functors

Canonical extensions and ultraproducts of polarities

J{\'o}nsson and Tarski's notion of the perfect extension of a Boolean algebra with operators has evolved into an extensive theory of canonical extensions of lattice-based algebras. After reviewing this evolution we make two contributions. First it is shown that the failure of a variety of algebras to be closed under canonical extensions is witnessed by a particular one of its free algebras. The size of the set of generators of this algebra can be made a function of a collection of varieties and is a kind of Hanf number for canonical closure. Secondly we study the complete lattice of stable subsets of a polarity structure, and show that if a class of polarities is closed under ultraproducts, then its stable set lattices generate a variety that is closed under canonical extensions. This generalises an earlier result of the author about generation of canonically closed varieties of Boolean algebras with operators, which was in turn an abstraction of the result that a first-order definable class of Kripke frames determines a modal logic that is valid in its so-called canonical frames

Morphisms and Duality for Polarities and Lattices with Operators

Structures based on polarities have been used to provide relational semantics for propositional logics that are modelled algebraically by non-distributive lattices with additional operators. This article develops a first order notion of morphism between polarity-based structures that generalises the theory of bounded morphisms for Boolean modal logics. It defines a category of such structures that is contravariantly dual to a given category of lattice-based algebras whose additional operations preserve either finite joins or finite meets. Two different versions of the Goldblatt-Thomason theorem are derived in this setting

From non-commutative diagrams to anti-elementary classes

Anti-elementarity is a strong way of ensuring that a class of structures , in a given first-order language, is not closed under elementary equivalence with respect to any infinitary language of the form L $\infty$$\lambda$. We prove that many naturally defined classes are anti-elementary, including the following: $\bullet$ the class of all lattices of finitely generated convex {\ell}-subgroups of members of any class of {\ell}-groups containing all Archimedean {\ell}-groups; $\bullet$ the class of all semilattices of finitely generated {\ell}-ideals of members of any nontrivial quasivariety of {\ell}-groups; $\bullet$ the class of all Stone duals of spectra of MV-algebras-this yields a negative solution for the MV-spectrum Problem; $\bullet$ the class of all semilattices of finitely generated two-sided ideals of rings; $\bullet$ the class of all semilattices of finitely generated submodules of modules; $\bullet$ the class of all monoids encoding the nonstable $K_0$-theory of von Neumann regular rings, respectively C*-algebras of real rank zero; $\bullet$ (assuming arbitrarily large Erd"os cardinals) the class of all coordinatizable sectionally complemented modular lattices with a large 4-frame. The main underlying principle is that under quite general conditions, for a functor $\Phi$ : A $\rightarrow$ B, if there exists a non-commutative diagram D of A, indexed by a common sort of poset called an almost join-semilattice, such that $\bullet$ $\Phi$ D^I is a commutative diagram for every set I, $\bullet$ $\Phi$ D is not isomorphic to $\Phi$ X for any commutative diagram X in A, then the range of $\Phi$ is anti-elementary.Comment: 49 pages. Journal of Mathematical Logic, World Scientific Publishing, In pres