A Formally Verified Prover for the ALC Description Logic

The Ontology Web Language (OWL) is a language used for the Semantic Web. OWL is based on Description Logics (DLs), a family of logical formalisms for representing and reasoning about conceptual and terminological knowledge. Among these, the logic ALC is a ground DL used in many practical cases. Moreover, the Semantic Web appears as a new field for the application of formal methods, that could be used to increase its reliability. A starting point could be the formal verification of satisfiability provers for DLs. In this paper, we present the PVS specification of a prover for ALC , as well as the proofs of its termination, soundness and completeness. We also present the formalization of the well–foundedness of the multiset relation induced by a well–founded relation. This result has been used to prove the termination and the completeness of the ALC prover.Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia TIN2004–0388

Formally Verified Tableau-Based Reasoners for a Description Logic

Description Logics are a family of logics used to represent and reason about conceptual and terminological knowledge. One of the most basic description logics is ALC , used as a basis from which to obtain others. Description logics are particularly important to provide a logical basis for the web ontology languages (such as OWL) used in the Semantic Web. In order to increase the reliability of the Semantic Web, formal methods can be applied, and in particular formal verification of its reasoning services can be carried out. In this paper, we present the formal verification of a tableau-based satisfiability algorithm for the logic ALC . The verification has been completed in several stages. First, we develop an abstract formalization of satisfiability-checking of ALC -concepts. Secondly, we define and formally verify a tableau-based algorithm in which the order of rule application and branch selection can be flexibly specified, using a methodology of refinements to transfer the main properties from the ALC abstract formalization. Finally, we obtain verified and executable reasoners from the algorithm via a process of instantiation.Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación TIN2009-09492Junta de Andalucía TIC-0606

Verified Decision Procedures for Modal Logics

We describe a formalization of modal tableaux with histories for the modal logics K, KT and S4 in Lean. We describe how we formalized the static and transitional rules, the non-trivial termination and the correctness of loop-checks. The formalized tableaux are essentially executable decision procedures with soundness and completeness proved. Termination is also proved in order to define them as functions in Lean. All of these decision procedures return a concrete Kripke model in cases where the input set of formulas is satisfiable, and a proof constructed via the tableau rules witnessing unsatisfiability otherwise. We also describe an extensible formalization of backjumping and its verified implementation for the modal logic K. As far as we know, these are the first verified decision procedures for these modal logics

Proceedings of the Automated Reasoning Workshop (ARW 2019)

Preface This volume contains the proceedings of ARW 2019, the twenty sixths Workshop on Automated Rea- soning (2nd{3d September 2019) hosted by the Department of Computer Science, Middlesex University, England (UK). Traditionally, this annual workshop which brings together, for a two-day intensive pro- gramme, researchers from different areas of automated reasoning, covers both traditional and emerging topics, disseminates achieved results or work in progress. During informal discussions at workshop ses- sions, the attendees, whether they are established in the Automated Reasoning community or are only at their early stages of their research career, gain invaluable feedback from colleagues. ARW always looks at the ways of strengthening links between academia, industry and government; between theoretical and practical advances. The 26th ARW is affiliated with TABLEAUX 2019 conference. These proceedings contain forteen extended abstracts contributed by the participants of the workshop and assembled in order of their presentations at the workshop. The abstracts cover a wide range of topics including the development of reasoning techniques for Agents, Model-Checking, Proof Search for classical and non-classical logics, Description Logics, development of Intelligent Prediction Models, application of Machine Learning to theorem proving, applications of AR in Cloud Computing and Networking. I would like to thank the members of the ARW Organising Committee for their advice and assis- tance. I would also like to thank the organisers of TABLEAUX/FroCoS 2019, and Andrei Popescu, the TABLEAUX Conference Chair, in particular, for the enormous work related to the organisation of this affiliation. I would also like to thank Natalia Yerashenia for helping in preparing these proceedings. London Alexander Bolotov September 201

A cookbook for temporal conceptual data modelling with description logic

We design temporal description logics suitable for reasoning about temporal conceptual data models and investigate their computational complexity. Our formalisms are based on DL-Lite logics with three types of concept inclusions (ranging from atomic concept inclusions and disjointness to the full Booleans), as well as cardinality constraints and role inclusions. In the temporal dimension, they capture future and past temporal operators on concepts, flexible and rigid roles, the operators `always' and `some time' on roles, data assertions for particular moments of time and global concept inclusions. The logics are interpreted over the Cartesian products of object domains and the flow of time (Z,<), satisfying the constant domain assumption. We prove that the most expressive of our temporal description logics (which can capture lifespan cardinalities and either qualitative or quantitative evolution constraints) turn out to be undecidable. However, by omitting some of the temporal operators on concepts/roles or by restricting the form of concept inclusions we obtain logics whose complexity ranges between PSpace and NLogSpace. These positive results were obtained by reduction to various clausal fragments of propositional temporal logic, which opens a way to employ propositional or first-order temporal provers for reasoning about temporal data models

Proof-theoretic Semantics for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Linear Logic

This work is the first exploration of proof-theoretic semantics for a substructural logic. It focuses on the base-extension semantics (B-eS) for intuitionistic multiplicative linear logic (IMLL). The starting point is a review of Sandqvist’s B-eS for intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL), for which we propose an alternative treatment of conjunction that takes the form of the generalized elimination rule for the connective. The resulting semantics is shown to be sound and complete. This motivates our main contribution, a B-eS for IMLL , in which the definitions of the logical constants all take the form of their elimination rule and for which soundness and completeness are established

Context-Aware Modeling Using Semantic Web and Z Notation

Surveys in user context modeling have shown that the semantic web is one of the promising approach to represent and structure the contextual information captured from user’s surrounding environment in a context-aware application. A benefit of using semantic web language is that it enables application to reason user contextual information in order to get the knowledge of user’s behavior. However, regarding its notation format, semantic web is suitable for implementation level or to be consumed by application run-time. Context-aware application is a part of distributed computing system. In distributed computing system, the language used for specification should be distinguished from the implementation / run-time purpose. This is known as separation of modeling language. Regarding the context-aware application, for those who are concerned with specification of context modeling, the language that is used for specification should also be distinguished from the implementation one. This thesis aims at proposing the use of formal specification technique to develop a generic context ontology model of user’s behavior at the Computer and Information Sciences Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS. Initially, the context ontology was written in OWL semantic web language. The further process is mapping onto a formal specification language, i.e. onto Z notation. As a result, specification of context ontology and its consistency checking have been developed and verified beyond the semantic web language environment. An inconsistency of context model has been detected during the verification of Z model, which cannot be revealed by current OWL DL reasoner. The context-aware designers might benefit from the formal specification of context ontology, where the designers could fully use formal verification technique to check the correctness of context ontology. Thus, the modeling approach in this thesis has shown that it could complement the context ontology development process, where the checking and refinement are performed beyond the semantic web reasone

Proceedings of the Joint Automated Reasoning Workshop and Deduktionstreffen: As part of the Vienna Summer of Logic – IJCAR 23-24 July 2014

Preface For many years the British and the German automated reasoning communities have successfully run independent series of workshops for anybody working in the area of automated reasoning. Although open to the general public they addressed in the past primarily the British and the German communities, respectively. At the occasion of the Vienna Summer of Logic the two series have a joint event in Vienna as an IJCAR workshop. In the spirit of the two series there will be only informal proceedings with abstracts of the works presented. These are collected in this document. We have tried to maintain the informal open atmosphere of the two series and have welcomed in particular research students to present their work. We have solicited for all work related to automated reasoning and its applications with a particular interest in work-in-progress and the presentation of half-baked ideas. As in the previous years, we have aimed to bring together researchers from all areas of automated reasoning in order to foster links among researchers from various disciplines; among theoreticians, implementers and users alike, and among international communities, this year not just the British and German communities