633 research outputs found
A probabilistic linguistic thermodynamic method based on the water-filling algorithm and regret theory for emergency decision making
Since thermodynamics can describe the energy of matter and its
form of storage or transformation in the system, it is introduced
to resolve the uncertain decision-making problems. The paper
proposes the thermodynamic decision-making method which
considers both the quantity and quality of the probabilistic linguistic
decision information. The analogies for thermodynamical
indicators: energy, exergy and entropy are developed under the
probabilistic linguistic circumstance. The probabilistic linguistic
thermodynamic method combines the regret theory which captures
decision makersâ regret-aversion and the objective weight of
criterion obtained by the water-filling algorithm. The proposed
method is applied to select the optimal solution to respond to
the floods in Chongqing, China. The self-comparison is conducted
to verify the effectiveness of the objective weight obtained by
the water-filling algorithm and regret theory in the probabilistic
linguistic thermodynamic method. The reliability and feasibility of
the proposed method are verified by comparative analysis with
other decision-making methods by some simulation experiments
and non-parametric tests
Dynamic reference point method with probabilistic linguistic information based on the regret theory for public health emergency decision-making
Group emergency decision-making is an uncertain and dynamic
process, in which the decision makers may be bounded rational
and have a risk appetite. To depict the vague qualitative assessments, the probabilistic linguistic term sets are employed to
express the perceptions of decision makers. First, considering the
regret-aversion of the decision makersâ psychological characteristic, the value function and the regret-rejoice function in the regret
theory are modified to adapt the probabilistic linguistic information. Second, the definition and aggregation operators of the
probabilistic linguistic time variable are proposed to describe and
aggregate the dynamic decision information. Third, the probabilistic linguistic models based on the dynamic reference point
method and the regret theory are studied to maximise the
expectation-levels of alternatives at the relative time point. The
proposed method is applied to select the optimal response strategy for the outbreak of COVID-19 in China. Finally, the comparative analysis is designed to verify the applicability and
reasonability of the proposed method
Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decisionmaking based on regret theory for the evaluation of venture capital projects
The selection of venture capital investment projects is one of the
most important decision-making activities for venture capitalists.
Due to the complexity of investment market and the limited cognition
of people, most of the venture capital investment decision
problems are highly uncertain and the venture capitalists are
often bounded rational under uncertainty. To address such problems,
this article presents an approach based on regret theory to
probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making.
Firstly, when the information on the occurrence probabilities of
all the elements in the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy element
(P.H.F.E.) is unknown or partially known, two different mathematical
programming models based on water-filling theory and the
maximum entropy principle are provided to handle these complex
situations. Secondly, to capture the psychological behaviours
of venture capitalists, the regret theory is utilised to solve the
problem of selection of venture capital investment projects.
Finally, comparative analysis with the existing approaches is conducted
to demonstrate the feasibility and applicability of the proposed
method
A systematic review on multi-criteria group decision-making methods based on weights: analysis and classification scheme
Interest in group decision-making (GDM) has been increasing prominently over the last decade. Access to global databases, sophisticated sensors which can obtain multiple inputs or complex problems requiring opinions from several experts have driven interest in data aggregation. Consequently, the field has been widely studied from several viewpoints and multiple approaches have been proposed. Nevertheless, there is a lack of general framework. Moreover, this problem is exacerbated in the case of expertsâ weighting methods, one of the most widely-used techniques to deal with multiple source aggregation. This lack of general classification scheme, or a guide to assist expert knowledge, leads to ambiguity or misreading for readers, who may be overwhelmed by the large amount of unclassified information currently available. To invert this situation, a general GDM framework is presented which divides and classifies all data aggregation techniques, focusing on and expanding the classification of expertsâ weighting methods in terms of analysis type by carrying out an in-depth literature review. Results are not only classified but analysed and discussed regarding multiple characteristics, such as MCDMs in which they are applied, type of data used, ideal solutions considered or when they are applied. Furthermore, general requirements supplement this analysis such as initial influence, or component division considerations. As a result, this paper provides not only a general classification scheme and a detailed analysis of expertsâ weighting methods but also a road map for researchers working on GDM topics or a guide for experts who use these methods. Furthermore, six significant contributions for future research pathways are provided in the conclusions.The first author acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Universities [grant number FPU18/01471]. The second and third author wish to recognize their support from the Serra Hunter program. Finally, this work was supported by the Catalan agency AGAUR through its research group support program (2017SGR00227). This research is part of the R&D project IAQ4EDU, reference no. PID2020-117366RB-I00, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version
Optimization for Decision Making II
In the current context of the electronic governance of society, both administrations and citizens are demanding the greater participation of all the actors involved in the decision-making process relative to the governance of society. This book presents collective works published in the recent Special Issue (SI) entitled âOptimization for Decision Making IIâ. These works give an appropriate response to the new challenges raised, the decision-making process can be done by applying different methods and tools, as well as using different objectives. In real-life problems, the formulation of decision-making problems and the application of optimization techniques to support decisions are particularly complex and a wide range of optimization techniques and methodologies are used to minimize risks, improve quality in making decisions or, in general, to solve problems. In addition, a sensitivity or robustness analysis should be done to validate/analyze the influence of uncertainty regarding decision-making. This book brings together a collection of inter-/multi-disciplinary works applied to the optimization of decision making in a coherent manner
A dynamic multi-attribute group emergency decision making method considering expertsâ hesitation
Multi-attribute group emergency decision making (MAGEDM) has become a valuable research topic in
the last few years due to its effectiveness and reliability in dealing with real-world emergency events
(EEs). Dynamic evolution and uncertain information are remarkable features of EEs. The former means
that information related to EEs is usually changing with time and the development of EEs. To make an
effective and appropriate decision, such an important feature should be addressed during the emergency
decision process; however, it has not yet been discussed in current MAGEDM problems. Uncertain information
is a distinct feature of EEs, particularly in their early stage; hence, experts involved in aMAGEDM
problem might hesitate when they provide their assessments on different alternatives concerning different
criteria. Their hesitancy is a practical and inevitable issue, which plays an important role in dealing with
EEs successfully, and should be also considered in real world MAGEDM problems. Nevertheless, it has
been neglected in existing MAGEDM approaches. To manage such limitations, this study intends to propose
a novel MAGEDM method that deals with not only the dynamic evolution of MAGEDM problems,
but also takes into account uncertain information, including expertsâ hesitation. A case study is provided
and comparisons with current approaches and related discussions are presented to illustrate the feasibility
and validity of the proposed method.This work was partly supported
by the Young Doctoral Dissertation Project of Social
Science Planning Project of Fujian Province (Project
No. FJ2016C202), National Natural Science Foundation
of China (Project No. 71371053, 61773123),
Spanish National Research Project ( Project No.
TIN2015-66524-P), and Spanish Ministry of Economy
and Finance Postdoctoral Fellow (IJCI-2015-
23715)
Investment decision making along the B&R using critic approach in probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment
The Belt and Road (B&R) Initiative receives enthusiastic response, the aim of which is to develop cooperative partnerships with countries along the routes and build a community of common destiny. So far, Chinese companies have invested in many different countries along the B&R. Generally, the investment decision making problems are characterized by high risk and uncertainty. Then how to make an appropriate investment decision will be a thorny issue. In this paper, probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set (PHFS) is used for handling uncertainty in multiple attribute decision making (MADM), and the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) approach is extended to obtain attribute weights, no matter whether the weight information is incompletely known or not. Considering that the existing probabilistic hesitant fuzzy distance measures fail to meet the condition of distance measure, a new distance between PHFSs is proposed and applied to investment decision making for countries along the B&R. In the last, comparative analyses are performed to illustrate the advantages of the presented approach
Fuzzy Techniques for Decision Making 2018
Zadeh's fuzzy set theory incorporates the impreciseness of data and evaluations, by imputting the degrees by which each object belongs to a set. Its success fostered theories that codify the subjectivity, uncertainty, imprecision, or roughness of the evaluations. Their rationale is to produce new flexible methodologies in order to model a variety of concrete decision problems more realistically. This Special Issue garners contributions addressing novel tools, techniques and methodologies for decision making (inclusive of both individual and group, single- or multi-criteria decision making) in the context of these theories. It contains 38 research articles that contribute to a variety of setups that combine fuzziness, hesitancy, roughness, covering sets, and linguistic approaches. Their ranges vary from fundamental or technical to applied approaches
Disaster decision-making with a mixing regret philosophy DDAS method in Fermatean fuzzy number
In this paper, the use of the Fermatean fuzzy number (FFN) in a significant research problem of disaster decision-making by defining operational laws and score function is demonstrated. Generally, decision control authorities need to brand suitable and sensible disaster decisions in the direct conceivable period as unfitting decisions may consequence in enormous financial dead and thoughtful communal costs. To certify that a disaster comeback can be made, professionally, we propose a new disaster decision-making (DDM) technique by the Fermatean fuzzy Schweizer-Sklar environment. First, the Fermatean fuzzy Schweizer-Sklar operators are employed by decision-makers to rapidly analyze their indefinite and vague assessment information on disaster choices. Then, the DDM technique based on the FFN is planned to identify highly devastating disaster choices and the best available choices. Finally, the proposed regret philosophy DDM technique is shown functional to choose the ideal retort explanation for a communal fitness disaster in Pakistan. The dominance and realism of the intended technique are further defensible through a relative study with additional DDM systems
Green Logistic Provider Selection with a Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Thermodynamic Method Integrating Cumulative Prospect Theory and PROMETHEE
In the process of evaluating the green levels of cold-chain logistics providers, experts may
hesitate between several linguistic terms rather than give precise values over the alternatives. Due to the
potential profit and risk of business decisions, decision-making information is often based on expertsâ
expectations of programs and is expressed as hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms. The consistency of evaluation
information of an alternative can reflect the clarity of the alternative in the mind of experts and its own
controversy. This paper proposes a method to use the value transfer function in the cumulative prospect
theory to convert the original hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms into evaluation information based on
reference points. We also introduce the parameters related to the disorder of the systemin the hesitant
fuzzy thermodynamic method to describe the quantity and quality characteristics of the alternatives.
In these kinds of multi-criteria decision-making problems, the weights of criteria are of great importance
for decision-making results. Considering the conflicting cases among criteria, the weights were obtained
by utilizing the PROMETHEE method. An illustrative example concerning green logistics provider
selection was operated to show the practicability of the proposed method.The work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.
71501135, 71771156, and 71771153), the Scientific Research Foundation for Excellent Young Scholars at Sichuan
University (No. 2016SCU04A23), and the Scientific Research Foundation for Scholars at Sichuan University (No.
YJ201535)
- âŠ