Hybrid VCSPs with crisp and conservative valued templates

A constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) is a problem of computing a homomorphism ${\bf R} \rightarrow {\bf \Gamma}$ between two relational structures. Analyzing its complexity has been a very fruitful research direction, especially for fixed template CSPs, denoted $CSP({\bf \Gamma})$, in which the right side structure ${\bf \Gamma}$ is fixed and the left side structure ${\bf R}$ is unconstrained. Recently, the hybrid setting, written $CSP_{\mathcal{H}}({\bf \Gamma})$, where both sides are restricted simultaneously, attracted some attention. It assumes that ${\bf R}$ is taken from a class of relational structures $\mathcal{H}$ that additionally is closed under inverse homomorphisms. The last property allows to exploit algebraic tools that have been developed for fixed template CSPs. The key concept that connects hybrid CSPs with fixed-template CSPs is the so called "lifted language". Namely, this is a constraint language ${\bf \Gamma}_{{\bf R}}$ that can be constructed from an input ${\bf R}$. The tractability of that language for any input ${\bf R}\in\mathcal{H}$ is a necessary condition for the tractability of the hybrid problem. In the first part we investigate templates ${\bf \Gamma}$ for which the latter condition is not only necessary, but also is sufficient. We call such templates ${\bf \Gamma}$ widely tractable. For this purpose, we construct from ${\bf \Gamma}$ a new finite relational structure ${\bf \Gamma}'$ and define $\mathcal{H}_0$ as a class of structures homomorphic to ${\bf \Gamma}'$. We prove that wide tractability is equivalent to the tractability of $CSP_{\mathcal{H}_0}({\bf \Gamma})$. Our proof is based on the key observation that ${\bf R}$ is homomorphic to ${\bf \Gamma}'$ if and only if the core of ${\bf \Gamma}_{{\bf R}}$ is preserved by a Siggers polymorphism. Analogous result is shown for valued conservative CSPs.Comment: 21 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1504.0706

Minimum Cost Homomorphisms to Reflexive Digraphs

For digraphs $G$ and $H$, a homomorphism of $G$ to $H$ is a mapping $f:\ V(G)\dom V(H)$such that$uv\in A(G)$implies$f(u)f(v)\in A(H)$. If moreover each vertex$u \in V(G)$is associated with costs$c_i(u), i \in V(H)$, then the cost of a homomorphism$f$is$\sum_{u\in V(G)}c_{f(u)}(u)$. For each fixed digraph$H, the {\em minimum cost homomorphism problem} for H$, denoted MinHOM($H$), is the following problem. Given an input digraph$G$, together with costs$c_i(u)$,$u\in V(G)$,$i\in V(H)$, and an integer$k$, decide if$G$admits a homomorphism to$H$of cost not exceeding$k. We focus on the minimum cost homomorphism problem for {\em reflexive} digraphs H$(every vertex of$H$has a loop). It is known that the problem MinHOM($H$) is polynomial time solvable if the digraph$H has a {\em Min-Max ordering}, i.e., if its vertices can be linearly ordered by <$so that$i<j, s<r$and$ir, js \in A(H)$imply that$is \in A(H)$and$jr \in A(H)$. We give a forbidden induced subgraph characterization of reflexive digraphs with a Min-Max ordering; our characterization implies a polynomial time test for the existence of a Min-Max ordering. Using this characterization, we show that for a reflexive digraph$H$ which does not admit a Min-Max ordering, the minimum cost homomorphism problem is NP-complete. Thus we obtain a full dichotomy classification of the complexity of minimum cost homomorphism problems for reflexive digraphs

Approximation for Maximum Surjective Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Maximum surjective constraint satisfaction problems (Max-Sur-CSPs) are computational problems where we are given a set of variables denoting values from a finite domain B and a set of constraints on the variables. A solution to such a problem is a surjective mapping from the set of variables to B such that the number of satisfied constraints is maximized. We study the approximation performance that can be acccchieved by algorithms for these problems, mainly by investigating their relation with Max-CSPs (which are the corresponding problems without the surjectivity requirement). Our work gives a complexity dichotomy for Max-Sur-CSP(B) between PTAS and APX-complete, under the assumption that there is a complexity dichotomy for Max-CSP(B) between PO and APX-complete, which has already been proved on the Boolean domain and 3-element domains

Minimum Cost Homomorphisms to Locally Semicomplete and Quasi-Transitive Digraphs

For digraphs $G$ and $H$, a homomorphism of $G$ to $H$ is a mapping $f:\ V(G)\dom V(H)$such that$uv\in A(G)$implies$f(u)f(v)\in A(H)$. If, moreover, each vertex$u \in V(G)$is associated with costs$c_i(u), i \in V(H)$, then the cost of a homomorphism$f$is$\sum_{u\in V(G)}c_{f(u)}(u)$. For each fixed digraph$H$, the minimum cost homomorphism problem for$H$, denoted MinHOM($H$), can be formulated as follows: Given an input digraph$G$, together with costs$c_i(u)$,$u\in V(G)$,$i\in V(H)$, decide whether there exists a homomorphism of$G$to$H$ and, if one exists, to find one of minimum cost. Minimum cost homomorphism problems encompass (or are related to) many well studied optimization problems such as the minimum cost chromatic partition and repair analysis problems. We focus on the minimum cost homomorphism problem for locally semicomplete digraphs and quasi-transitive digraphs which are two well-known generalizations of tournaments. Using graph-theoretic characterization results for the two digraph classes, we obtain a full dichotomy classification of the complexity of minimum cost homomorphism problems for both classes