3,750 research outputs found
An Arithmetic-Based Deterministic Centroid Initialization Method for the k-Means Clustering Algorithm
One of the greatest challenges in k-means clustering is positioning the initial cluster centers, or centroids, as close to optimal as possible, and doing so in an amount of time deemed reasonable. Traditional fc-means utilizes a randomization process for initializing these centroids, and poor initialization can lead to increased numbers of required clustering iterations to reach convergence, and a greater overall runtime. This research proposes a simple, arithmetic-based deterministic centroid initialization method which is much faster than randomized initialization. Preliminary experiments suggest that this collection of methods, referred to herein as the sharding centroid initialization algorithm family, often outperforms random initialization in terms of the required number of iterations for convergence and overall time-related metrics and is competitive or better in terms of the reported mean sum of squared errors (SSE) metric. Surprisingly, the sharding algorithms often manage to report more advantageous mean SSE values in the instances where their performance is slower than random initialization
Inference and Evaluation of the Multinomial Mixture Model for Text Clustering
In this article, we investigate the use of a probabilistic model for
unsupervised clustering in text collections. Unsupervised clustering has become
a basic module for many intelligent text processing applications, such as
information retrieval, text classification or information extraction. The model
considered in this contribution consists of a mixture of multinomial
distributions over the word counts, each component corresponding to a different
theme. We present and contrast various estimation procedures, which apply both
in supervised and unsupervised contexts. In supervised learning, this work
suggests a criterion for evaluating the posterior odds of new documents which
is more statistically sound than the "naive Bayes" approach. In an unsupervised
context, we propose measures to set up a systematic evaluation framework and
start with examining the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm as the basic
tool for inference. We discuss the importance of initialization and the
influence of other features such as the smoothing strategy or the size of the
vocabulary, thereby illustrating the difficulties incurred by the high
dimensionality of the parameter space. We also propose a heuristic algorithm
based on iterative EM with vocabulary reduction to solve this problem. Using
the fact that the latent variables can be analytically integrated out, we
finally show that Gibbs sampling algorithm is tractable and compares favorably
to the basic expectation maximization approach
A Comparative Study of Efficient Initialization Methods for the K-Means Clustering Algorithm
K-means is undoubtedly the most widely used partitional clustering algorithm.
Unfortunately, due to its gradient descent nature, this algorithm is highly
sensitive to the initial placement of the cluster centers. Numerous
initialization methods have been proposed to address this problem. In this
paper, we first present an overview of these methods with an emphasis on their
computational efficiency. We then compare eight commonly used linear time
complexity initialization methods on a large and diverse collection of data
sets using various performance criteria. Finally, we analyze the experimental
results using non-parametric statistical tests and provide recommendations for
practitioners. We demonstrate that popular initialization methods often perform
poorly and that there are in fact strong alternatives to these methods.Comment: 17 pages, 1 figure, 7 table
Linear, Deterministic, and Order-Invariant Initialization Methods for the K-Means Clustering Algorithm
Over the past five decades, k-means has become the clustering algorithm of
choice in many application domains primarily due to its simplicity, time/space
efficiency, and invariance to the ordering of the data points. Unfortunately,
the algorithm's sensitivity to the initial selection of the cluster centers
remains to be its most serious drawback. Numerous initialization methods have
been proposed to address this drawback. Many of these methods, however, have
time complexity superlinear in the number of data points, which makes them
impractical for large data sets. On the other hand, linear methods are often
random and/or sensitive to the ordering of the data points. These methods are
generally unreliable in that the quality of their results is unpredictable.
Therefore, it is common practice to perform multiple runs of such methods and
take the output of the run that produces the best results. Such a practice,
however, greatly increases the computational requirements of the otherwise
highly efficient k-means algorithm. In this chapter, we investigate the
empirical performance of six linear, deterministic (non-random), and
order-invariant k-means initialization methods on a large and diverse
collection of data sets from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. The results
demonstrate that two relatively unknown hierarchical initialization methods due
to Su and Dy outperform the remaining four methods with respect to two
objective effectiveness criteria. In addition, a recent method due to Erisoglu
et al. performs surprisingly poorly.Comment: 21 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables, Partitional Clustering Algorithms
(Springer, 2014). arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with
arXiv:1304.7465, arXiv:1209.196
- …