24,028 research outputs found
Class Association Rules Mining based Rough Set Method
This paper investigates the mining of class association rules with rough set
approach. In data mining, an association occurs between two set of elements
when one element set happen together with another. A class association rule set
(CARs) is a subset of association rules with classes specified as their
consequences. We present an efficient algorithm for mining the finest class
rule set inspired form Apriori algorithm, where the support and confidence are
computed based on the elementary set of lower approximation included in the
property of rough set theory. Our proposed approach has been shown very
effective, where the rough set approach for class association discovery is much
simpler than the classic association method.Comment: 10 pages, 2 figure
Covering rough sets based on neighborhoods: An approach without using neighborhoods
Rough set theory, a mathematical tool to deal with inexact or uncertain
knowledge in information systems, has originally described the indiscernibility
of elements by equivalence relations. Covering rough sets are a natural
extension of classical rough sets by relaxing the partitions arising from
equivalence relations to coverings. Recently, some topological concepts such as
neighborhood have been applied to covering rough sets. In this paper, we
further investigate the covering rough sets based on neighborhoods by
approximation operations. We show that the upper approximation based on
neighborhoods can be defined equivalently without using neighborhoods. To
analyze the coverings themselves, we introduce unary and composition operations
on coverings. A notion of homomorphismis provided to relate two covering
approximation spaces. We also examine the properties of approximations
preserved by the operations and homomorphisms, respectively.Comment: 13 pages; to appear in International Journal of Approximate Reasonin
A comprehensive study of implicator-conjunctor based and noise-tolerant fuzzy rough sets: definitions, properties and robustness analysis
© 2014 Elsevier B.V. Both rough and fuzzy set theories offer interesting tools for dealing with imperfect data: while the former allows us to work with uncertain and incomplete information, the latter provides a formal setting for vague concepts. The two theories are highly compatible, and since the late 1980s many researchers have studied their hybridization. In this paper, we critically evaluate most relevant fuzzy rough set models proposed in the literature. To this end, we establish a formally correct and unified mathematical framework for them. Both implicator-conjunctor-based definitions and noise-tolerant models are studied. We evaluate these models on two different fronts: firstly, we discuss which properties of the original rough set model can be maintained and secondly, we examine how robust they are against both class and attribute noise. By highlighting the benefits and drawbacks of the different fuzzy rough set models, this study appears a necessary first step to propose and develop new models in future research.Lynn D’eer has been supported by the Ghent University Special Research Fund, Chris Cornelis was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology under the project TIN2011-28488 and the Andalusian Research Plans P11-TIC-7765 and P10-TIC-6858, and by project PYR-2014-8 of the Genil Program of CEI BioTic GRANADA and Lluis Godo has been partially supported by the Spanish MINECO project EdeTRI TIN2012-39348-C02-01Peer Reviewe
- …