2,353 research outputs found
Kripke Semantics for Martin-L\"of's Extensional Type Theory
It is well-known that simple type theory is complete with respect to
non-standard set-valued models. Completeness for standard models only holds
with respect to certain extended classes of models, e.g., the class of
cartesian closed categories. Similarly, dependent type theory is complete for
locally cartesian closed categories. However, it is usually difficult to
establish the coherence of interpretations of dependent type theory, i.e., to
show that the interpretations of equal expressions are indeed equal. Several
classes of models have been used to remedy this problem. We contribute to this
investigation by giving a semantics that is standard, coherent, and
sufficiently general for completeness while remaining relatively easy to
compute with. Our models interpret types of Martin-L\"of's extensional
dependent type theory as sets indexed over posets or, equivalently, as
fibrations over posets. This semantics can be seen as a generalization to
dependent type theory of the interpretation of intuitionistic first-order logic
in Kripke models. This yields a simple coherent model theory, with respect to
which simple and dependent type theory are sound and complete
On Irrelevance and Algorithmic Equality in Predicative Type Theory
Dependently typed programs contain an excessive amount of static terms which
are necessary to please the type checker but irrelevant for computation. To
separate static and dynamic code, several static analyses and type systems have
been put forward. We consider Pfenning's type theory with irrelevant
quantification which is compatible with a type-based notion of equality that
respects eta-laws. We extend Pfenning's theory to universes and large
eliminations and develop its meta-theory. Subject reduction, normalization and
consistency are obtained by a Kripke model over the typed equality judgement.
Finally, a type-directed equality algorithm is described whose completeness is
proven by a second Kripke model.Comment: 36 pages, superseds the FoSSaCS 2011 paper of the first author,
titled "Irrelevance in Type Theory with a Heterogeneous Equality Judgement
The Broadest Necessity
In this paper the logic of broad necessity is explored. Definitions of what it means for one modality to be broader than another are formulated, and it is proven, in the context of higher-order logic, that there is a broadest necessity, settling one of the central questions of this investigation. It is shown, moreover, that it is possible to give a reductive analysis of this necessity in extensional language. This relates more generally to a conjecture that it is not possible to define intensional connectives from extensional notions. This conjecture is formulated precisely in higher-order logic, and concrete cases in which it fails are examined. The paper ends with a discussion of the logic of broad necessity. It is shown that the logic of broad necessity is a normal modal logic between S4 and Triv, and that it is consistent with a natural axiomatic system of higher-order logic that it is exactly S4. Some philosophical reasons to think that the logic of broad necessity does not include the S5 principle are given
Critical analysis of the Carmo-Jones system of Contrary-to-Duty obligations
We offer a technical analysis of the contrary to duty system proposed in
Carmo-Jones. We offer analysis/simplification/repair of their system and
compare it with our own related system
- …