284,918 research outputs found
An interpretation of the Sigma-2 fragment of classical Analysis in System T
We show that it is possible to define a realizability interpretation for the
-fragment of classical Analysis using G\"odel's System T only. This
supplements a previous result of Schwichtenberg regarding bar recursion at
types 0 and 1 by showing how to avoid using bar recursion altogether. Our
result is proved via a conservative extension of System T with an operator for
composable continuations from the theory of programming languages due to Danvy
and Filinski. The fragment of Analysis is therefore essentially constructive,
even in presence of the full Axiom of Choice schema: Weak Church's Rule holds
of it in spite of the fact that it is strong enough to refute the formal
arithmetical version of Church's Thesis
Perspectives for proof unwinding by programming languages techniques
In this chapter, we propose some future directions of work, potentially
beneficial to Mathematics and its foundations, based on the recent import of
methodology from the theory of programming languages into proof theory. This
scientific essay, written for the audience of proof theorists as well as the
working mathematician, is not a survey of the field, but rather a personal view
of the author who hopes that it may inspire future and fellow researchers
Applying G\"odel's Dialectica Interpretation to Obtain a Constructive Proof of Higman's Lemma
We use G\"odel's Dialectica interpretation to analyse Nash-Williams' elegant
but non-constructive "minimal bad sequence" proof of Higman's Lemma. The result
is a concise constructive proof of the lemma (for arbitrary decidable
well-quasi-orders) in which Nash-Williams' combinatorial idea is clearly
present, along with an explicit program for finding an embedded pair in
sequences of words.Comment: In Proceedings CL&C 2012, arXiv:1210.289
- …