16,763 research outputs found
Multi-domain clinical natural language processing with MedCAT: The Medical Concept Annotation Toolkit
Electronic health records (EHR) contain large volumes of unstructured text, requiring the application of information extraction (IE) technologies to enable clinical analysis. We present the open source Medical Concept Annotation Toolkit (MedCAT) that provides: (a) a novel self-supervised machine learning algorithm for extracting concepts using any concept vocabulary including UMLS/SNOMED-CT; (b) a feature-rich annotation interface for customizing and training IE models; and (c) integrations to the broader CogStack ecosystem for vendor-agnostic health system deployment. We show improved performance in extracting UMLS concepts from open datasets (F1:0.448-0.738 vs 0.429-0.650). Further real-world validation demonstrates SNOMED-CT extraction at 3 large London hospitals with self-supervised training over ∼8.8B words from ∼17M clinical records and further fine-tuning with ∼6K clinician annotated examples. We show strong transferability (F1 > 0.94) between hospitals, datasets and concept types indicating cross-domain EHR-agnostic utility for accelerated clinical and research use cases
Annotating patient clinical records with syntactic chunks and named entities: the Harvey corpus
The free text notes typed by physicians during patient consultations contain valuable information for the study of disease and treatment. These notes are difficult to process by existing natural language analysis tools since they are highly telegraphic (omitting many words), and contain many spelling mistakes, inconsistencies in punctuation, and non-standard word order. To support information extraction and classification tasks over such text, we describe a de-identified corpus of free text notes, a shallow syntactic and named entity annotation scheme for this kind of text, and an approach to training domain specialists with no linguistic background to annotate the text. Finally, we present a statistical chunking system for such clinical text with a stable learning rate and good accuracy, indicating that the manual annotation is consistent and that the annotation scheme is tractable for machine learning
Implementing a Portable Clinical NLP System with a Common Data Model - a Lisp Perspective
This paper presents a Lisp architecture for a portable NLP system, termed
LAPNLP, for processing clinical notes. LAPNLP integrates multiple standard,
customized and in-house developed NLP tools. Our system facilitates portability
across different institutions and data systems by incorporating an enriched
Common Data Model (CDM) to standardize necessary data elements. It utilizes
UMLS to perform domain adaptation when integrating generic domain NLP tools. It
also features stand-off annotations that are specified by positional reference
to the original document. We built an interval tree based search engine to
efficiently query and retrieve the stand-off annotations by specifying
positional requirements. We also developed a utility to convert an inline
annotation format to stand-off annotations to enable the reuse of clinical text
datasets with inline annotations. We experimented with our system on several
NLP facilitated tasks including computational phenotyping for lymphoma patients
and semantic relation extraction for clinical notes. These experiments
showcased the broader applicability and utility of LAPNLP.Comment: 6 pages, accepted by IEEE BIBM 2018 as regular pape
Recommended from our members
Coreference resolution in clinical discharge summaries, progress notes, surgical and pathology reports: a unified lexical approach
We developed a lexical rule-based system that uses a unified approach to resolving coreference across a wide variety of clinical records comprising discharge summaries, progress notes, pathology, radiology and surgical reports from two corpora (Ontology Development and Information Extraction (ODIE) and i2b2/VA) provided for the fifth i2b2/VA shared task. Taking the unweighted mean between 4 coreference metrics, validation of the system against the i2b2/VA corpus attained an overall F-score of 87.7% across all mention classes, with a maximum of 93.1% for coreference of persons, and a minimum of 77.2% for coreference of tests. For the ODIE corpus the overall F-score across all mention classes was 79.4%, with a maximum of 82.0% for coreference of persons and a minimum of 13.1% for coreference of diagnostic reagents. For the ODIE corpus our results are comparable to the mean reported inter-annotator agreement with the gold standard. We discuss the four categories of errors we identified, and how these might be addressed. The system uses a number of reusable modules and techniques that may be of benefit to the research community
- …