5,653 research outputs found
On the Relation of Interaction Semantics to Continuations and Defunctionalization
In game semantics and related approaches to programming language semantics,
programs are modelled by interaction dialogues. Such models have recently been
used in the design of new compilation methods, e.g. for hardware synthesis or
for programming with sublinear space. This paper relates such semantically
motivated non-standard compilation methods to more standard techniques in the
compilation of functional programming languages, namely continuation passing
and defunctionalization. We first show for the linear {\lambda}-calculus that
interpretation in a model of computation by interaction can be described as a
call-by-name CPS-translation followed by a defunctionalization procedure that
takes into account control-flow information. We then establish a relation
between these two compilation methods for the simply-typed {\lambda}-calculus
and end by considering recursion
Type-Based Termination, Inflationary Fixed-Points, and Mixed Inductive-Coinductive Types
Type systems certify program properties in a compositional way. From a bigger
program one can abstract out a part and certify the properties of the resulting
abstract program by just using the type of the part that was abstracted away.
Termination and productivity are non-trivial yet desired program properties,
and several type systems have been put forward that guarantee termination,
compositionally. These type systems are intimately connected to the definition
of least and greatest fixed-points by ordinal iteration. While most type
systems use conventional iteration, we consider inflationary iteration in this
article. We demonstrate how this leads to a more principled type system, with
recursion based on well-founded induction. The type system has a prototypical
implementation, MiniAgda, and we show in particular how it certifies
productivity of corecursive and mixed recursive-corecursive functions.Comment: In Proceedings FICS 2012, arXiv:1202.317
Compositional Reasoning for Explicit Resource Management in Channel-Based Concurrency
We define a pi-calculus variant with a costed semantics where channels are
treated as resources that must explicitly be allocated before they are used and
can be deallocated when no longer required. We use a substructural type system
tracking permission transfer to construct coinductive proof techniques for
comparing behaviour and resource usage efficiency of concurrent processes. We
establish full abstraction results between our coinductive definitions and a
contextual behavioural preorder describing a notion of process efficiency
w.r.t. its management of resources. We also justify these definitions and
respective proof techniques through numerous examples and a case study
comparing two concurrent implementations of an extensible buffer.Comment: 51 pages, 7 figure
FunTAL: Reasonably Mixing a Functional Language with Assembly
We present FunTAL, the first multi-language system to formalize safe
interoperability between a high-level functional language and low-level
assembly code while supporting compositional reasoning about the mix. A central
challenge in developing such a multi-language is bridging the gap between
assembly, which is staged into jumps to continuations, and high-level code,
where subterms return a result. We present a compositional stack-based typed
assembly language that supports components, comprised of one or more basic
blocks, that may be embedded in high-level contexts. We also present a logical
relation for FunTAL that supports reasoning about equivalence of high-level
components and their assembly replacements, mixed-language programs with
callbacks between languages, and assembly components comprised of different
numbers of basic blocks.Comment: 15 pages; implementation at https://dbp.io/artifacts/funtal/;
published in PLDI '17, Proceedings of the 38th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on
Programming Language Design and Implementation, June 18 - 23, 2017,
Barcelona, Spai
Work Analysis with Resource-Aware Session Types
While there exist several successful techniques for supporting programmers in
deriving static resource bounds for sequential code, analyzing the resource
usage of message-passing concurrent processes poses additional challenges. To
meet these challenges, this article presents an analysis for statically
deriving worst-case bounds on the total work performed by message-passing
processes. To decompose interacting processes into components that can be
analyzed in isolation, the analysis is based on novel resource-aware session
types, which describe protocols and resource contracts for inter-process
communication. A key innovation is that both messages and processes carry
potential to share and amortize cost while communicating. To symbolically
express resource usage in a setting without static data structures and
intrinsic sizes, resource contracts describe bounds that are functions of
interactions between processes. Resource-aware session types combine standard
binary session types and type-based amortized resource analysis in a linear
type system. This type system is formulated for a core session-type calculus of
the language SILL and proved sound with respect to a multiset-based operational
cost semantics that tracks the total number of messages that are exchanged in a
system. The effectiveness of the analysis is demonstrated by analyzing standard
examples from amortized analysis and the literature on session types and by a
comparative performance analysis of different concurrent programs implementing
the same interface.Comment: 25 pages, 2 pages of references, 11 pages of appendix, Accepted at
LICS 201
On Role Logic
We present role logic, a notation for describing properties of relational
structures in shape analysis, databases, and knowledge bases. We construct role
logic using the ideas of de Bruijn's notation for lambda calculus, an encoding
of first-order logic in lambda calculus, and a simple rule for implicit
arguments of unary and binary predicates. The unrestricted version of role
logic has the expressive power of first-order logic with transitive closure.
Using a syntactic restriction on role logic formulas, we identify a natural
fragment RL^2 of role logic. We show that the RL^2 fragment has the same
expressive power as two-variable logic with counting C^2 and is therefore
decidable. We present a translation of an imperative language into the
decidable fragment RL^2, which allows compositional verification of programs
that manipulate relational structures. In addition, we show how RL^2 encodes
boolean shape analysis constraints and an expressive description logic.Comment: 20 pages. Our later SAS 2004 result builds on this wor
Ontology and Formal Semantics - Integration Overdue
In this note we suggest that difficulties encountered in natural language semantics are, for the most part, due to the use of mere symbol manipulation systems that are devoid of any content. In such systems, where there is hardly any link with our common-sense view of the world, and it is quite difficult to envision how one can formally account for the considerable amount of content that is often implicit, but almost never explicitly stated in our everyday discourse. \ud
The solution, in our opinion, is a compositional semantics grounded in an ontology that reflects our commonsense view of the world and the way we talk about it in ordinary language. In the compositional logic we envision there are ontological (or first-intension) concepts, and logical (or second-intension) concepts, and where the ontological concepts include not only Davidsonian events, but other abstract objects as well (e.g., states, processes, properties, activities, attributes, etc.) \ud
It will be demonstrated here that in such a framework, a number of challenges in the semantics of natural language (e.g., metonymy, intensionality, metaphor, etc.) can be properly and uniformly addressed.\u
- …