A Survey of Dataset Refinement for Problems in Computer Vision Datasets

Large-scale datasets have played a crucial role in the advancement of computer vision. However, they often suffer from problems such as class imbalance, noisy labels, dataset bias, or high resource costs, which can inhibit model performance and reduce trustworthiness. With the advocacy of data-centric research, various data-centric solutions have been proposed to solve the dataset problems mentioned above. They improve the quality of datasets by re-organizing them, which we call dataset refinement. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive and structured overview of recent advances in dataset refinement for problematic computer vision datasets. Firstly, we summarize and analyze the various problems encountered in large-scale computer vision datasets. Then, we classify the dataset refinement algorithms into three categories based on the refinement process: data sampling, data subset selection, and active learning. In addition, we organize these dataset refinement methods according to the addressed data problems and provide a systematic comparative description. We point out that these three types of dataset refinement have distinct advantages and disadvantages for dataset problems, which informs the choice of the data-centric method appropriate to a particular research objective. Finally, we summarize the current literature and propose potential future research topics.Comment: 33 pages, 10 figures, to be published in ACM Computing Survey

Cover tree based dynamization of clustering algorithms

openIn questo lavoro, i Cover Tree sono l'obiettivo principale e servono come struttura di dati per memorizzare in modo efficiente i dati. Li utilizziamo per gestire dinamicamente il k-Center problem, sia con che senza outlier. La struttura Cover Tree è progettata per recuperare un coreset, una rappresentazione molto piccola dei dati, che viene poi fornito a un algoritmo di clustering offline per ottenere rapidamente una soluzione per l'intero set di dati. Rispetto alla definizione originale, il Cover Tree implementato viene aumentato con nuovi campi, per mantenere informazioni aggiuntive cruciali per l'estrazione di coreset ragionevoli. Le soluzioni ottenibili per i problemi citati sono approssimazioni (α + ε), dove α rappresenta la migliore approssimazione nota ottenibile in tempo polinomiale nell'impostazione standard offline e ε>0 è un parametro di precisione fornito dall'utente. L'obiettivo principale dell'utilizzo di una struttura dati dinamica è quello di ottenere una soluzione ragionevole, rispetto a quella ottenuta applicando gli algoritmi di clustering da zero a tutti i dati. Per verificare la qualità della nostra soluzione, conduciamo una serie di esperimenti per valutarne le prestazioni e mettere a punto i parametri coinvolti.In this work, cover trees are the main focus, and they serve as a data structure to efficiently store metric data. We utilize them for dynamically handling the k-center problem, both with and without outliers. The cover tree data structure is designed to retrieve a coreset, a very succinct summary of the data, which is then fed to an offline clustering algorithm to quickly obtain a solution for the whole dataset. With respect to the original definition, the cover tree implemented is augmented, to maintain additional information crucial for extracting reasonable coresets. The solutions obtainable for the mentioned problems are (α + ε)-approximations, where α represents the best-known approximation achievable in polynomial time in the standard offline setting, and ε>0 is a user-provided accuracy parameter. The main objective in using a dynamic data structure is to obtain a reasonable solution, in comparison to the solution obtained by applying the clustering algorithms from scratch to all the data points. To ascertain the quality of our solution, we conduct a series of experiments to evaluate its performance and to fine-tune the involved parameters

Data-Efficient Training of CNNs and Transformers with Coresets: A Stability Perspective

Coreset selection is among the most effective ways to reduce the training time of CNNs, however, only limited is known on how the resultant models will behave under variations of the coreset size, and choice of datasets and models. Moreover, given the recent paradigm shift towards transformer-based models, it is still an open question how coreset selection would impact their performance. There are several similar intriguing questions that need to be answered for a wide acceptance of coreset selection methods, and this paper attempts to answer some of these. We present a systematic benchmarking setup and perform a rigorous comparison of different coreset selection methods on CNNs and transformers. Our investigation reveals that under certain circumstances, random selection of subsets is more robust and stable when compared with the SOTA selection methods. We demonstrate that the conventional concept of uniform subset sampling across the various classes of the data is not the appropriate choice. Rather samples should be adaptively chosen based on the complexity of the data distribution for each class. Transformers are generally pretrained on large datasets, and we show that for certain target datasets, it helps to keep their performance stable at even very small coreset sizes. We further show that when no pretraining is done or when the pretrained transformer models are used with non-natural images (e.g. medical data), CNNs tend to generalize better than transformers at even very small coreset sizes. Lastly, we demonstrate that in the absence of the right pretraining, CNNs are better at learning the semantic coherence between spatially distant objects within an image, and these tend to outperform transformers at almost all choices of the coreset size

BigFCM: Fast, Precise and Scalable FCM on Hadoop

Clustering plays an important role in mining big data both as a modeling technique and a preprocessing step in many data mining process implementations. Fuzzy clustering provides more flexibility than non-fuzzy methods by allowing each data record to belong to more than one cluster to some degree. However, a serious challenge in fuzzy clustering is the lack of scalability. Massive datasets in emerging fields such as geosciences, biology and networking do require parallel and distributed computations with high performance to solve real-world problems. Although some clustering methods are already improved to execute on big data platforms, but their execution time is highly increased for large datasets. In this paper, a scalable Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering named BigFCM is proposed and designed for the Hadoop distributed data platform. Based on the map-reduce programming model, it exploits several mechanisms including an efficient caching design to achieve several orders of magnitude reduction in execution time. Extensive evaluation over multi-gigabyte datasets shows that BigFCM is scalable while it preserves the quality of clustering

Applied Randomized Algorithms for Efficient Genomic Analysis

The scope and scale of biological data continues to grow at an exponential clip, driven by advances in genetic sequencing, annotation and widespread adoption of surveillance efforts. For instance, the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) now contains more than 25 petabases of public data, while RefSeq, a collection of reference genomes, recently surpassed 100,000 complete genomes. In the process, it has outgrown the practical reach of many traditional algorithmic approaches in both time and space. Motivated by this extreme scale, this thesis details efficient methods for clustering and summarizing large collections of sequence data. While our primary area of interest is biological sequences, these approaches largely apply to sequence collections of any type, including natural language, software source code, and graph structured data. We applied recent advances in randomized algorithms to practical problems. We used MinHash and HyperLogLog, both examples of Locality- Sensitive Hashing, as well as coresets, which are approximate representations for finite sum problems, to build methods capable of scaling to billions of items. Ultimately, these are all derived from variations on sampling. We combined these advances with hardware-based optimizations and incorporated into free and open-source software libraries (sketch, frp, lib- simdsampling) and practical software tools built on these libraries (Dashing, Minicore, Dashing 2), empowering users to interact practically with colossal datasets on commodity hardware

You Only Condense Once: Two Rules for Pruning Condensed Datasets

Dataset condensation is a crucial tool for enhancing training efficiency by reducing the size of the training dataset, particularly in on-device scenarios. However, these scenarios have two significant challenges: 1) the varying computational resources available on the devices require a dataset size different from the pre-defined condensed dataset, and 2) the limited computational resources often preclude the possibility of conducting additional condensation processes. We introduce You Only Condense Once (YOCO) to overcome these limitations. On top of one condensed dataset, YOCO produces smaller condensed datasets with two embarrassingly simple dataset pruning rules: Low LBPE Score and Balanced Construction. YOCO offers two key advantages: 1) it can flexibly resize the dataset to fit varying computational constraints, and 2) it eliminates the need for extra condensation processes, which can be computationally prohibitive. Experiments validate our findings on networks including ConvNet, ResNet and DenseNet, and datasets including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet. For example, our YOCO surpassed various dataset condensation and dataset pruning methods on CIFAR-10 with ten Images Per Class (IPC), achieving 6.98-8.89% and 6.31-23.92% accuracy gains, respectively. The code is available at: https://github.com/he-y/you-only-condense-once.Comment: Accepted by NeurIPS 202

BlinkML: Efficient Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Probabilistic Guarantees

The rising volume of datasets has made training machine learning (ML) models a major computational cost in the enterprise. Given the iterative nature of model and parameter tuning, many analysts use a small sample of their entire data during their initial stage of analysis to make quick decisions (e.g., what features or hyperparameters to use) and use the entire dataset only in later stages (i.e., when they have converged to a specific model). This sampling, however, is performed in an ad-hoc fashion. Most practitioners cannot precisely capture the effect of sampling on the quality of their model, and eventually on their decision-making process during the tuning phase. Moreover, without systematic support for sampling operators, many optimizations and reuse opportunities are lost. In this paper, we introduce BlinkML, a system for fast, quality-guaranteed ML training. BlinkML allows users to make error-computation tradeoffs: instead of training a model on their full data (i.e., full model), BlinkML can quickly train an approximate model with quality guarantees using a sample. The quality guarantees ensure that, with high probability, the approximate model makes the same predictions as the full model. BlinkML currently supports any ML model that relies on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), which includes Generalized Linear Models (e.g., linear regression, logistic regression, max entropy classifier, Poisson regression) as well as PPCA (Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis). Our experiments show that BlinkML can speed up the training of large-scale ML tasks by 6.26x-629x while guaranteeing the same predictions, with 95% probability, as the full model.Comment: 22 pages, SIGMOD 201