1,089 research outputs found

    Strength of linguistic text evidence: A fused forensic text comparison system

    Get PDF
    Compared to other forensic comparative sciences, studies of the efficacy of the likelihood ratio (LR) framework in forensic authorship analysis are lagging. An experiment is described concerning the estimation of strength of linguistic text evidence within that framework. The LRs were estimated by trialling three different procedures: one is based on the multivariate kernel density (MVKD) formula, with each group of messages being modelled as a vector of authorship attribution features; the other two involve N-grams based on word tokens and characters, respectively. The LRs that were separately estimated from the three different procedures are logistic-regression-fused to obtain a single LR for each author comparison. This study used predatory chatlog messages sampled from 115 authors. To see how the number of word tokens affects the performance of a forensic text comparison (FTC) system, token numbers used for modelling each group of messages were progressively increased: 500, 1000, 1500 and 2500 tokens. The performance of the FTC system is assessed using the log-likelihood-ratio cost (Cllr), which is a gradient metric for the quality of LRs, and the strength of the derived LRs is charted as Tippett plots. It is demonstrated in this study that (i) out of the three procedures, the MVKD procedure with authorship attribution features performed best in terms of Cllr, and that (ii) the fused system outperformed all three of the single procedures. When the token length is 1500, for example, the fused system achieved a Cllr value of 0.15. Some unrealistically strong LRs were observed in the results. Reasons for these are discussed, and a possible solution to the problem, namely the empirical lower and upper bound LR (ELUB) method is trialled and applied to the LRs of the best-achieving fusion system

    An investigation of supervector regression for forensic voice comparison on small data

    Get PDF
    International audienceThe present paper deals with an observer design for a nonlinear lateral vehicle model. The nonlinear model is represented by an exact Takagi-Sugeno (TS) model via the sector nonlinearity transformation. A proportional multiple integral observer (PMIO) based on the TS model is designed to estimate simultaneously the state vector and the unknown input (road curvature). The convergence conditions of the estimation error are expressed under LMI formulation using the Lyapunov theory which guaranties bounded error. Simulations are carried out and experimental results are provided to illustrate the proposed observer

    Sample size and the multivariate kernel density likelihood ratio : how many speakers are enough?

    Get PDF
    The likelihood ratio (LR) is now widely accepted as the appropriate framework for evaluating expert evidence. However, an empirical issue in forensic voice comparison is the number of speakers required to generate robust LR output and adequately test system performance. In this study, Monte Carlo simulations were used to synthesise temporal midpoint F1, F2 and F3 values from the hesitation marker um from a set of raw data consisting of 86 male speakers of standard southern British English. Using the multivariate kernel density LR approach, these data were used to investigate: (1) the number of development (training) speakers required for adequate calibration, (2) the number of test speakers needed for robust validity, and (3) the effects of varying the number of reference speakers. The experiments were run over 20 replications to assess the effects of which, as well as how many, speakers are included in each set. Predictably, LR output was most imprecise using small samples. Comparison across the three experiments shows that the greatest variability in LR output was found as a function of the number of development speakers – where stable LR output was only achieved with more than 20 speakers. Thus, it is possible to achieve stable output (in terms of system-level metrics) with small numbers of test and reference speakers, as long as the system is adequately calibrated. Importantly, however, LRs for individual comparisons may still be substantially affected by the inclusion of additional speakers in each set, even when large samples are used

    Formant trajectories in forensic speaker recognition

    Get PDF
    Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht das Leistungsverhalten eines Ansatzes der forensischen Sprechererkennung, der auf parametrischen Repräsentationen von Formantverläufen basiert. Quadratische und kubische Polynomfunktionen werden dabei an Formantverläufe von Diphthongen angenähert. Die resultierenden Koeffizienten sowie die ersten drei bzw. vier Komponenten der Diskreten Kosinustransformation (DCT) werden in Folge verwendet, um die dynamischen Eigenschaften der zugrundeliegenden akustischen Merkmale der Sprache und damit der Sprechercharakteristika zu erfassen. Am Ende steht eine Repräsentation bestehend aus wenigen dekorrelierten Parametern, die für die forensische Sprechererkennung verwendet werden. Die in der Untersuchung durchgeführte Evaluierung beinhaltet die Berechnung von Likelihood-Ratio-Werten für die Anwendung im Bayesschen Ansatz für die Bewertung von forensischen Beweisstücken. Die Vorteile dieses Systems und die derzeitigen Beschränkungen werden behandelt. Für die Berechnung der Likelihood-Ratio-Werte wird eine von Aitken & Lucy (2004) entwickelte multivariate Kernel-Density-Formel verwendet, die sowohl Zwischen-Sprecher- als auch Inner-Sprecher-Variabilität berücksichtigt. Automatische Kalibrierungs- und Fusionstechniken, wie sie in Systemen zur automatischen Sprecheridentifikation verwendet werden, werden auf die Ergebniswerte angewendet. Um die Bedeutung von Längenaspekten von Diphthongen für die forensische Sprechererkennung näher zu untersuchen wird ein Experiment durchgeführt, in dem der Effekt von Zeitnormalisierung sowie die Modellierung der Dauer durch einen expliziten Parameter evaluiert werden. Die Leistungsfähigkeit der parametrischen Repräsentationen verglichen mit anderen Methoden sowie die Effekte der Kalibrierung und Fusion werden unter Verwendung üblicher Bewertungswerkzeuge wie des Erkennungsfehlerabwägungs-(DET)-Diagramms, des Tippett-Diagramms und des angewandten Fehlerwahrscheinlichkeits-(APE)-Diagramms, sowie numerischer Kennziffern wie der Gleichfehlerrate (EER) und der Cllr-Metrik evaluiert.The present work investigates the performance of an approach for forensic speaker recognition that is based on parametric representations of formant trajectories. Quadratic and cubic polynomial functions are fitted to formant contours of diphthongs. The resulting coefficients as well as the first three to four components derived from discrete cosine transform (DCT) are used in order to capture the dynamic properties of the underlying speech acoustics, and thus of the speaker characteristics. This results in a representation based on only a small number of decorrelated parameters that are in turn used for forensic speaker recognition. The evaluation conducted in the study incorporates the calculation of likelihood ratios for use in the Bayesian approach of evidence evaluation. The advantages of this framework and its current limitations are discussed. For the calculation of the likelihood ratios a multivariate kernel density formula developed by Aitken & Lucy (2004) is used which takes both between-speaker and within-speaker variability into account. Automatic calibration and fusion techniques as they are used in automatic speaker identification systems are applied to the resulting scores. To further investigate the importance of duration aspects of the diphthongs for speaker recognition an experiment is undertaken that evaluates the effect of time-normalisation as well as modelling segment durations using an explicit parameter. The performance of the parametric representation approach compared with other methods as well as the effects of calibration and fusion are evaluated using standard evaluation tools like the detection error trade-off (DET) plots, the applied probability of error (APE) plot, the Tippett plot as well as numerical indices like the EER and the Cllr metric

    Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios

    Get PDF
    We describe and validate a feature-based system for calculation of likelihood ratios from 3D digital images of fired cartridge cases. The system includes a database of 3D digital images of the bases of 10 cartridges fired per firearm from approximately 300 firearms of the same class (semi-automatic pistols that fire 9 mm diameter centre-fire Luger-type ammunition, and that have hemispherical firing pins and parallel breech-face marks). The images were captured using Evofinder®, an imaging system that is commonly used by operational forensic laboratories. A key component of the research reported is the comparison of different feature-extraction methods. Feature sets compared include those previously proposed in the literature, plus Zernike-moment based features. Comparisons are also made of using feature sets extracted from the firing-pin impression, from the breech-face region, and from the whole region of interest (firing-pin impression + breech-face region + flowback if present). Likelihood ratios are calculated using a statistical modelling pipeline that is standard in forensic voice comparison. Validation is conducted and results are assessed using validation procedures and validation metrics and graphics that are standard in forensic voice comparison

    Forging a Stable Relationship?: Bridging the Law and Forensic Science Divide in the Academy

    Get PDF
    The marriage of law and science has most often been represented as discordant. While the law/science divide meme is hardly novel, concerns over the potentially deleterious coupling within the criminal justice system may have reached fever pitch. There is a growing chorus of disapproval addressed to ‘forensic science’, accompanied by the denigration of legal professionals for being unable or unwilling to forge a symbiotic relationship with forensic scientists. The 2009 National Academy of Sciences Report on forensic science heralds the latest call for greater collaboration between ‘law’ and ‘science’, particularly in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) yet little reaction has been apparent amid law and science faculties. To investigate the potential for interdisciplinary cooperation, the authors received funding for a project: ‘Lowering the Drawbridges: Forensic and Legal Education in the 21st Century’, hoping to stimulate both law and forensic science educators to seek mutually beneficial solutions to common educational problems and build vital connections in the academy. A workshop held in the UK, attended by academics and practitioners from scientific, policing, and legal backgrounds marked the commencement of the project. This paper outlines some of the workshop conclusions to elucidate areas of dissent and consensus, and where further dialogue is required, but aims to strike a note of optimism that the ‘cultural divide’ should not be taken to be so wide as to be beyond the legal and forensic science academy to bridge. The authors seek to demonstrate that legal and forensic science educators can work cooperatively to respond to critics and forge new paths in learning and teaching, creating an opportunity to take stock and enrich our discipline as well as answer critics. As Latham (2010:34) exhorts, we are not interested in turning lawyers into scientists and vice versa, but building a foundation upon which they can build during their professional lives: “Instead of melding the two cultures, we need to establish conditions of cooperation, mutual respect, and mutual reliance between them.” Law and forensic science educators should, and can assist with the building of a mutual understanding between forensic scientists and legal professionals, a significant step on the road to answering calls for the professions to minimise some of the risks associated with the use of forensic science in the criminal process. REFERENCES Latham, S.R. 2010, ‘Law between the cultures: C.P.Snow’s The Two Cultures and the problem of scientific illiteracy in law’ 32 Technology in Society, 31-34. KEYWORDS forensic science education legal education law/science divid

    The definition of the relevant population and the collection of data for likelihood ratio-based forensic voice comparison

    Get PDF
    Within the field of forensic speech science there is increasing acceptance of the likelihood ratio (LR) as the logically and legally correct framework for evaluating forensic voice comparison (FVC) evidence. However, only a small proportion of experts cur- rently use the numerical LR in casework. This is due primarily to the difficulties involved in accounting for the inherent, and arguably unique, complexity of speech in a fully data-driven, numerical LR analysis. This thesis addresses two such issues: the definition of the relevant population and the amount of data required for system testing. Firstly, experiments are presented which explore the extent to which LRs are affected by different definitions of the relevant population with regard to sources of systematic sociolinguistic between-speaker variation (regional background, socio-economic class and age) using both linguistic-phonetic and ASR variables. Results show that different definitions of the relevant population can have a substantial effect on the magnitude of LRs, depending on the input variable. However, system validity results suggest that narrow controls over sociolinguistic sources of variation should be preferred to general controls. Secondly, experiments are presented which evaluate the effects of development, test and reference sample size on LRs. Consistent with general principles in statistics, more precise results are found using more data across all experiments. There is also considerable evidence of a relationship between sample size sensitivity and the dimensionality and speaker discriminatory power of the input variable. Further, there are potential trade-offs in the size of each set depending on which element of LR output the analyst is interested in. The results in this thesis will contribute towards im- proving the extent to which LR methods account for the linguistic-phonetic complexity of speech evidence. In accounting for this complexity, this work will also increase the practical viability of applying the numerical LR to FVC casework

    Reconocimiento automático de locutor e idioma mediante caracterización acústica de unidades lingüísticas

    Full text link
    Tesis doctoral inédita leída en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Departamento de Tecnología Electrónica y de las Comunicaciones . Fecha de lectura: 30-06-201

    A Likelihood-Ratio Based Forensic Voice Comparison in Standard Thai

    Get PDF
    This research uses a likelihood ratio (LR) framework to assess the discriminatory power of a range of acoustic parameters extracted from speech samples produced by male speakers of Standard Thai. The thesis aims to answer two main questions: 1) to what extent the tested linguistic-phonetic segments of Standard Thai perform in forensic voice comparison (FVC); and 2) how such linguistic-phonetic segments are profitably combined through logistic regression using the FoCal Toolkit (Brümmer, 2007). The segments focused on in this study are the four consonants /s, ʨh, n, m/ and the two diphthongs [ɔi, ai]. First of all, using the alveolar fricative /s/, two different sets of features were compared in terms of their performance in FVC. The first comprised the spectrum-based distributional features of four spectral moments, namely mean, variance, skew and kurtosis; the second consisted of the coefficients of the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCTs) applied to a spectrum. As DCTs were found to perform better, they were subsequently used to model the consonant spectrum of the remaining consonants. The consonant spectrum was extracted at the center point of the /s, ʨh, n, m/ consonants with a Hamming window of 31.25 msec. For the diphthongs [ɔi] - [nɔi L] and [ai] - [mai HL], the cubic polynomials fitted to the F2 and F1-F3 formants were tested separately. The quadratic polynomials fitted to the tonal F0 contours of [ɔi] - [nɔi L] and [ai] - [mai HL] were tested as well. Long-term F0 distribution (LTF0) was also trialed. The results show the promising discriminatory power of the Standard Thai acoustic features and segments tested in this thesis. The main findings are as follows. 1. The fricative /s/ performed better with the DCTs (Cllr = 0.70) than with the spectral moments (Cllr = 0.92). 2. The nasals /n, m/ (Cllr = 0.47) performed better than the affricate /tɕh/ (Cllr = 0.54) and the fricative /s/ (Cllr = 0.70) when their DCT coefficients were parameterized. 3. F1-F3 trajectories (Cllr = 0.42 and Cllr = 0.49) outperformed F2 trajectory (Cllr = 0.69 and Cllr = 0.67) for both diphthongs [ɔi] and [ai]. 4. F1-F3 trajectories of the diphthong [ɔi] (Cllr = 0.42) outperformed those of [ai] (Cllr = 0.49). 5. Tonal F0 (Cllr = 0.52) outperformed LTF0 (Cllr = 0.74). 6. Overall, better results were obtained when DCTs of /n/ - [na: HL] and /n/ - [nɔi L] were fused. (Cllr = 0.40 with the largest consistent-with-fact SSLog10LR = 2.53). In light of the findings, we can conclude that Standard Thai is generally amenable to FVC, especially when linguistic-phonetic segments are being combined; it is recommended that the latter procedure be followed when dealing with forensically realistic casework
    corecore