Learning to Interpret and Apply Multimodal Descriptions

Han T. Learning to Interpret and Apply Multimodal Descriptions. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld; 2018.Enabling computers to understand natural human communication is a goal researchers have been long aspired to in artificial intelligence. Since the concept demonstration of “Put-That- There” in 1980s, significant achievements have been made in developing multimodal interfaces that can process human communication such as speech, eye gaze, facial emotion, co-verbal hand gestures and pen input. State-of-the-art multimodal interfaces are able to process pointing gestures, symbolic gestures with conventional meanings, as well as gesture commands with pre-defined meanings (e.g., circling for “select”). However, in natural communication, co- verbal gestures/pen input rarely convey meanings via conventions or pre-defined rules, but embody meanings relatable to the accompanying speech. For example, in route given tasks, people often describe landmarks verbally (e.g., two buildings), while demonstrating the relative position with two hands facing each other in the space. Interestingly, when the same gesture is accompanied by the utterance a ball, it may indicate the size of the ball. Hence, the interpretation of such co-verbal hand gestures largely depends on the accompanied verbal content. Similarly, when describing objects, while verbal utterances are most convenient for describing colour and category (e.g., a brown elephant), hand-drawn sketches are often deployed to convey iconic information such as the exact shape of the elephant’s trunk, which is typically difficult to encode in language. This dissertation concerns the task of learning to interpret multimodal descriptions com- posed of verbal utterances and hand gestures/sketches, and apply corresponding interpretations to tasks such as image retrieval. Specifically, we aim to address following research questions: 1) For co-verbal gestures that embody meanings relatable to accompanied verbal content, how can we use natural language information to interpret the semantics of such co-verbal gestures, e.g., does a gesture indicate relative position or size? 2) As an integral system of commu- nication, speech and gestures not only bear close semantic relations, but also close temporal relations. To what degree and on which dimensions can hand gestures benefit the task of inter- preting multimodal descriptions? 3) While it’s obvious that iconic information in hand-drawn sketches enriches verbal content in object descriptions, how to model the joint contributions of such multimodal descriptions and to what degree can verbal descriptions compensate reduced iconic details in hand-drawn sketches? To address the above questions, we first introduce three multimodal description corpora: a spatial description corpus composed of natural language and placing gestures (also referred as abstract deictics), a multimodal object description corpus composed of natural language and hand-drawn sketches, and an existing corpus - the Bielefeld Speech and Gesture Alignment Corpus (SAGA). 3 4 We frame the problem of learning gesture semantics as a multi-label classification task us- ing natural language information and hand gesture features. We conducted an experiment with the SAGA corpus. The results show that natural language is informative for the interpretation of hand gestures. Further more, we describe a system that models the interpretation and application of spatial descriptions and explored three variants of representation methods of the verbal content. When representing the verbal content in the descriptions with a set of automatically learned symbols, the system’s performance is on par with representations with manually defined symbols (e.g., pre-defined object properties). We show that abstract deictic gestures not only lead to better understanding of spatial descriptions, but also result in earlier correct decisions of the system, which can be used to trigger immediate reactions in dialogue systems. Finally, we investigate the interplay of semantics between symbolic (natural language) and iconic (sketches) modes in multimodal object descriptions, where natural language and sketches jointly contribute to the communications. We model the meaning of natural language and sketches two existing models and combine the meanings from both modalities with a late fusion approach. The results show that even adding reduced sketches (30% of full sketches) can help in the retrieval task. Moreover, in current setup, natural language descriptions can compensate around 30% of reduced sketches

Placing Objects in Gesture Space: Toward Real-Time Understanding of Spatial Descriptions

Han T, Kennington C, Schlangen D. Placing Objects in Gesture Space: Toward Real-Time Understanding of Spatial Descriptions. In: Proceedings of the thirty-second AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI18). New Orleans: The association for the advancement of artificial intelligence; 2018

Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluation

This paper surveys the current state of the art in Natural Language Generation (NLG), defined as the task of generating text or speech from non-linguistic input. A survey of NLG is timely in view of the changes that the field has undergone over the past decade or so, especially in relation to new (usually data-driven) methods, as well as new applications of NLG technology. This survey therefore aims to (a) give an up-to-date synthesis of research on the core tasks in NLG and the architectures adopted in which such tasks are organised; (b) highlight a number of relatively recent research topics that have arisen partly as a result of growing synergies between NLG and other areas of artificial intelligence; (c) draw attention to the challenges in NLG evaluation, relating them to similar challenges faced in other areas of Natural Language Processing, with an emphasis on different evaluation methods and the relationships between them.Comment: Published in Journal of AI Research (JAIR), volume 61, pp 75-170. 118 pages, 8 figures, 1 tabl