360 research outputs found
Modal logics are coalgebraic
Applications of modal logics are abundant in computer science, and a large number of structurally different modal logics have been successfully employed in a diverse spectrum of application contexts. Coalgebraic semantics, on the other hand, provides a uniform and encompassing view on the large variety of specific logics used in particular domains. The coalgebraic approach is generic and compositional: tools and techniques simultaneously apply to a large class of application areas and can moreover be combined in a modular way. In particular, this facilitates a pick-and-choose approach to domain specific formalisms, applicable across the entire scope of application areas, leading to generic software tools that are easier to design, to implement, and to maintain. This paper substantiates the authors' firm belief that the systematic exploitation of the coalgebraic nature of modal logic will not only have impact on the field of modal logic itself but also lead to significant progress in a number of areas within computer science, such as knowledge representation and concurrency/mobility
GSOS for non-deterministic processes with quantitative aspects
Recently, some general frameworks have been proposed as unifying theories for
processes combining non-determinism with quantitative aspects (such as
probabilistic or stochastically timed executions), aiming to provide general
results and tools. This paper provides two contributions in this respect.
First, we present a general GSOS specification format (and a corresponding
notion of bisimulation) for non-deterministic processes with quantitative
aspects. These specifications define labelled transition systems according to
the ULTraS model, an extension of the usual LTSs where the transition relation
associates any source state and transition label with state reachability weight
functions (like, e.g., probability distributions). This format, hence called
Weight Function SOS (WFSOS), covers many known systems and their bisimulations
(e.g. PEPA, TIPP, PCSP) and GSOS formats (e.g. GSOS, Weighted GSOS,
Segala-GSOS, among others).
The second contribution is a characterization of these systems as coalgebras
of a class of functors, parametric on the weight structure. This result allows
us to prove soundness of the WFSOS specification format, and that
bisimilarities induced by these specifications are always congruences.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2014, arXiv:1406.156
A Definition Scheme for Quantitative Bisimulation
FuTS, state-to-function transition systems are generalizations of labeled
transition systems and of familiar notions of quantitative semantical models as
continuous-time Markov chains, interactive Markov chains, and Markov automata.
A general scheme for the definition of a notion of strong bisimulation
associated with a FuTS is proposed. It is shown that this notion of
bisimulation for a FuTS coincides with the coalgebraic notion of behavioral
equivalence associated to the functor on Set given by the type of the FuTS. For
a series of concrete quantitative semantical models the notion of bisimulation
as reported in the literature is proven to coincide with the notion of
quantitative bisimulation obtained from the scheme. The comparison includes
models with orthogonal behaviour, like interactive Markov chains, and with
multiple levels of behavior, like Markov automata. As a consequence of the
general result relating FuTS bisimulation and behavioral equivalence we obtain,
in a systematic way, a coalgebraic underpinning of all quantitative
bisimulations discussed.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2015, arXiv:1509.0816
Modal Ω-Logic: Automata, Neo-Logicism, and Set-Theoretic Realism
This essay examines the philosophical significance of -logic in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with choice (ZFC). The duality between coalgebra and algebra permits Boolean-valued algebraic models of ZFC to be interpreted as coalgebras. The modal profile of -logical validity can then be countenanced within a coalgebraic logic, and -logical validity can be defined via deterministic automata. I argue that the philosophical significance of the foregoing is two-fold. First, because the epistemic and modal profiles of -logical validity correspond to those of second-order logical consequence, -logical validity is genuinely logical, and thus vindicates a neo-logicist conception of mathematical truth in the set-theoretic multiverse. Second, the foregoing provides a modal-computational account of the interpretation of mathematical vocabulary, adducing in favor of a realist conception of the cumulative hierarchy of sets
PSPACE Bounds for Rank-1 Modal Logics
For lack of general algorithmic methods that apply to wide classes of logics,
establishing a complexity bound for a given modal logic is often a laborious
task. The present work is a step towards a general theory of the complexity of
modal logics. Our main result is that all rank-1 logics enjoy a shallow model
property and thus are, under mild assumptions on the format of their
axiomatisation, in PSPACE. This leads to a unified derivation of tight
PSPACE-bounds for a number of logics including K, KD, coalition logic, graded
modal logic, majority logic, and probabilistic modal logic. Our generic
algorithm moreover finds tableau proofs that witness pleasant proof-theoretic
properties including a weak subformula property. This generality is made
possible by a coalgebraic semantics, which conveniently abstracts from the
details of a given model class and thus allows covering a broad range of logics
in a uniform way
A Coalgebraic Approach to Kleene Algebra with Tests
Kleene algebra with tests is an extension of Kleene algebra, the algebra of
regular expressions, which can be used to reason about programs. We develop a
coalgebraic theory of Kleene algebra with tests, along the lines of the
coalgebraic theory of regular expressions based on deterministic automata.
Since the known automata-theoretic presentation of Kleene algebra with tests
does not lend itself to a coalgebraic theory, we define a new interpretation of
Kleene algebra with tests expressions and a corresponding automata-theoretic
presentation. One outcome of the theory is a coinductive proof principle, that
can be used to establish equivalence of our Kleene algebra with tests
expressions.Comment: 21 pages, 1 figure; preliminary version appeared in Proc. Workshop on
Coalgebraic Methods in Computer Science (CMCS'03
A Ghost at
In the final chain of the countable powerset functor, we show that the set at
index , regarded as a transition system, is not strongly extensional
because it contains a "ghost" element that has no successor even though its
component at each successor index is inhabited. The method, adapted from a
construction of Forti and Honsell, also gives ghosts at larger ordinals in the
final chain of other subfunctors of the powerset functor. This leads to a
precise description of which sets in these final chains are strongly
extensional
A coalgebraic semantics for causality in Petri nets
In this paper we revisit some pioneering efforts to equip Petri nets with
compact operational models for expressing causality. The models we propose have
a bisimilarity relation and a minimal representative for each equivalence
class, and they can be fully explained as coalgebras on a presheaf category on
an index category of partial orders. First, we provide a set-theoretic model in
the form of a a causal case graph, that is a labeled transition system where
states and transitions represent markings and firings of the net, respectively,
and are equipped with causal information. Most importantly, each state has a
poset representing causal dependencies among past events. Our first result
shows the correspondence with behavior structure semantics as proposed by
Trakhtenbrot and Rabinovich. Causal case graphs may be infinitely-branching and
have infinitely many states, but we show how they can be refined to get an
equivalent finitely-branching model. In it, states are equipped with
symmetries, which are essential for the existence of a minimal, often
finite-state, model. The next step is constructing a coalgebraic model. We
exploit the fact that events can be represented as names, and event generation
as name generation. Thus we can apply the Fiore-Turi framework: we model causal
relations as a suitable category of posets with action labels, and generation
of new events with causal dependencies as an endofunctor on this category. Then
we define a well-behaved category of coalgebras. Our coalgebraic model is still
infinite-state, but we exploit the equivalence between coalgebras over a class
of presheaves and History Dependent automata to derive a compact
representation, which is equivalent to our set-theoretical compact model.
Remarkably, state reduction is automatically performed along the equivalence.Comment: Accepted by Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programmin
- …