2,070 research outputs found
Deciding the value 1 problem for probabilistic leaktight automata
The value 1 problem is a decision problem for probabilistic automata over
finite words: given a probabilistic automaton, are there words accepted with
probability arbitrarily close to 1? This problem was proved undecidable
recently; to overcome this, several classes of probabilistic automata of
different nature were proposed, for which the value 1 problem has been shown
decidable. In this paper, we introduce yet another class of probabilistic
automata, called leaktight automata, which strictly subsumes all classes of
probabilistic automata whose value 1 problem is known to be decidable. We prove
that for leaktight automata, the value 1 problem is decidable (in fact,
PSPACE-complete) by constructing a saturation algorithm based on the
computation of a monoid abstracting the behaviours of the automaton. We rely on
algebraic techniques developed by Simon to prove that this abstraction is
complete. Furthermore, we adapt this saturation algorithm to decide whether an
automaton is leaktight. Finally, we show a reduction allowing to extend our
decidability results from finite words to infinite ones, implying that the
value 1 problem for probabilistic leaktight parity automata is decidable
Recommended from our members
Containment and equivalence of weighted automata: Probabilistic and max-plus cases
This paper surveys some results regarding decision problems for probabilistic and max-plus automata, such as containment and equivalence. Probabilistic and max-plus automata are part of the general family of weighted automata, whose semantics are maps from words to real values. Given two weighted automata, the equivalence problem asks whether their semantics are the same, and the containment problem whether one is point-wise smaller than the other one. These problems have been studied intensively and this paper will review some techniques used to show (un)decidability and state a list of open questions that still remain
When is Containment Decidable for Probabilistic Automata?
The containment problem for quantitative automata is the natural quantitative generalisation of the classical language inclusion problem for Boolean automata. We study it for probabilistic automata, where it is known to be undecidable in general. We restrict our study to the class of probabilistic automata with bounded ambiguity. There, we show decidability (subject to Schanuel's conjecture) when one of the automata is assumed to be unambiguous while the other one is allowed to be finitely ambiguous. Furthermore, we show that this is close to the most general decidable fragment of this problem by proving that it is already undecidable if one of the automata is allowed to be linearly ambiguous
What is known about the Value 1 Problem for Probabilistic Automata?
The value 1 problem is a decision problem for probabilistic automata over
finite words: are there words accepted by the automaton with arbitrarily high
probability? Although undecidable, this problem attracted a lot of attention
over the last few years. The aim of this paper is to review and relate the
results pertaining to the value 1 problem. In particular, several algorithms
have been proposed to partially solve this problem. We show the relations
between them, leading to the following conclusion: the Markov Monoid Algorithm
is the most correct algorithm known to (partially) solve the value 1 problem
Decidable and undecidable problems about quantum automata
We study the following decision problem: is the language recognized by a
quantum finite automaton empty or non-empty? We prove that this problem is
decidable or undecidable depending on whether recognition is defined by strict
or non-strict thresholds. This result is in contrast with the corresponding
situation for probabilistic finite automata for which it is known that strict
and non-strict thresholds both lead to undecidable problems.Comment: 10 page
Probabilistic Opacity for Markov Decision Processes
Opacity is a generic security property, that has been defined on (non
probabilistic) transition systems and later on Markov chains with labels. For a
secret predicate, given as a subset of runs, and a function describing the view
of an external observer, the value of interest for opacity is a measure of the
set of runs disclosing the secret. We extend this definition to the richer
framework of Markov decision processes, where non deterministic choice is
combined with probabilistic transitions, and we study related decidability
problems with partial or complete observation hypotheses for the schedulers. We
prove that all questions are decidable with complete observation and
-regular secrets. With partial observation, we prove that all
quantitative questions are undecidable but the question whether a system is
almost surely non opaque becomes decidable for a restricted class of
-regular secrets, as well as for all -regular secrets under
finite-memory schedulers
Model Checking Probabilistic Pushdown Automata
We consider the model checking problem for probabilistic pushdown automata
(pPDA) and properties expressible in various probabilistic logics. We start
with properties that can be formulated as instances of a generalized random
walk problem. We prove that both qualitative and quantitative model checking
for this class of properties and pPDA is decidable. Then we show that model
checking for the qualitative fragment of the logic PCTL and pPDA is also
decidable. Moreover, we develop an error-tolerant model checking algorithm for
PCTL and the subclass of stateless pPDA. Finally, we consider the class of
omega-regular properties and show that both qualitative and quantitative model
checking for pPDA is decidable
Real-time and Probabilistic Temporal Logics: An Overview
Over the last two decades, there has been an extensive study on logical
formalisms for specifying and verifying real-time systems. Temporal logics have
been an important research subject within this direction. Although numerous
logics have been introduced for the formal specification of real-time and
complex systems, an up to date comprehensive analysis of these logics does not
exist in the literature. In this paper we analyse real-time and probabilistic
temporal logics which have been widely used in this field. We extrapolate the
notions of decidability, axiomatizability, expressiveness, model checking, etc.
for each logic analysed. We also provide a comparison of features of the
temporal logics discussed
On the Complexity of the Equivalence Problem for Probabilistic Automata
Checking two probabilistic automata for equivalence has been shown to be a
key problem for efficiently establishing various behavioural and anonymity
properties of probabilistic systems. In recent experiments a randomised
equivalence test based on polynomial identity testing outperformed
deterministic algorithms. In this paper we show that polynomial identity
testing yields efficient algorithms for various generalisations of the
equivalence problem. First, we provide a randomized NC procedure that also
outputs a counterexample trace in case of inequivalence. Second, we show how to
check for equivalence two probabilistic automata with (cumulative) rewards. Our
algorithm runs in deterministic polynomial time, if the number of reward
counters is fixed. Finally we show that the equivalence problem for
probabilistic visibly pushdown automata is logspace equivalent to the
Arithmetic Circuit Identity Testing problem, which is to decide whether a
polynomial represented by an arithmetic circuit is identically zero.Comment: technical report for a FoSSaCS'12 pape
- …