7,972 research outputs found
Connectionist simulation of attitude learning: Asymmetries in the acquisition of positive and negative evaluations
Connectionist computer simulation was employed to explore the notion that, if attitudes guide approach and avoidance behaviors, false negative beliefs are likely to remain uncorrected for longer than false positive beliefs. In Study 1, the authors trained a three-layer neural network to discriminate "good" and "bad" inputs distributed across a two-dimensional space. "Full feedback" training, whereby connection weights were modified to reduce error after every trial, resulted in perfect discrimination. "Contingent feedback," whereby connection weights were only updated following outputs representing approach behavior, led to several false negative errors (good inputs misclassified as bad). In Study 2, the network was redesigned to distinguish a system for learning evaluations from a mechanism for selecting actions. Biasing action selection toward approach eliminated the asymmetry between learning of good and bad inputs under contingent feedback. Implications for various attitudinal phenomena and biases in social cognition are discussed
Min Max Generalization for Two-stage Deterministic Batch Mode Reinforcement Learning: Relaxation Schemes
We study the minmax optimization problem introduced in [22] for computing
policies for batch mode reinforcement learning in a deterministic setting.
First, we show that this problem is NP-hard. In the two-stage case, we provide
two relaxation schemes. The first relaxation scheme works by dropping some
constraints in order to obtain a problem that is solvable in polynomial time.
The second relaxation scheme, based on a Lagrangian relaxation where all
constraints are dualized, leads to a conic quadratic programming problem. We
also theoretically prove and empirically illustrate that both relaxation
schemes provide better results than those given in [22]
Navigating Occluded Intersections with Autonomous Vehicles using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Providing an efficient strategy to navigate safely through unsignaled
intersections is a difficult task that requires determining the intent of other
drivers. We explore the effectiveness of Deep Reinforcement Learning to handle
intersection problems. Using recent advances in Deep RL, we are able to learn
policies that surpass the performance of a commonly-used heuristic approach in
several metrics including task completion time and goal success rate and have
limited ability to generalize. We then explore a system's ability to learn
active sensing behaviors to enable navigating safely in the case of occlusions.
Our analysis, provides insight into the intersection handling problem, the
solutions learned by the network point out several shortcomings of current
rule-based methods, and the failures of our current deep reinforcement learning
system point to future research directions.Comment: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2018
Anatomy and computational modeling of networks underlying cognitive-emotional interaction
The classical dichotomy between cognition and emotion equated the first with rationality or logic and the second with irrational behaviors. The idea that cognition and emotion are separable, antagonistic forces competing for dominance of mind has been hard to displace despite abundant evidence to the contrary. For instance, it is now known that a pathological absence of emotion leads to profound impairment of decision making. Behavioral observations of this kind are corroborated at the mechanistic level: neuroanatomical studies reveal that brain areas typically described as underlying either cognitive or emotional processes are linked in ways that imply complex interactions that do not resemble a simple mutual antagonism. Instead, physiological studies and network simulations suggest that top-down signals from prefrontal cortex realize "cognitive control" in part by either suppressing or promoting emotional responses controlled by the amygdala, in a way that facilitates adaptation to changing task demands. Behavioral, anatomical, and physiological data suggest that emotion and cognition are equal partners in enabling a continuum or matrix of flexible behaviors that are subserved by multiple brain regions acting in concert. Here we focus on neuroanatomical data that highlight circuitry that structures cognitive-emotional interactions by directly or indirectly linking prefrontal areas with the amygdala. We also present an initial computational circuit model, based on anatomical, physiological, and behavioral data to explicitly frame the learning and performance mechanisms by which cognition and emotion interact to achieve flexible behavior.R01 MH057414 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01 NS024760 - NINDS NIH HH
Learning Negotiating Behavior Between Cars in Intersections using Deep Q-Learning
This paper concerns automated vehicles negotiating with other vehicles,
typically human driven, in crossings with the goal to find a decision algorithm
by learning typical behaviors of other vehicles. The vehicle observes distance
and speed of vehicles on the intersecting road and use a policy that adapts its
speed along its pre-defined trajectory to pass the crossing efficiently. Deep
Q-learning is used on simulated traffic with different predefined driver
behaviors and intentions. The results show a policy that is able to cross the
intersection avoiding collision with other vehicles 98% of the time, while at
the same time not being too passive. Moreover, inferring information over time
is important to distinguish between different intentions and is shown by
comparing the collision rate between a Deep Recurrent Q-Network at 0.85% and a
Deep Q-learning at 1.75%.Comment: 6 pages, 7 figures, Accepted to IEEE International Conference on
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 201
- …