116,420 research outputs found
A Causality Analysis Framework for Component-Based Real-Time Systems
We propose an approach to enhance the fault diagnosis in black-box component-based systems, in which only events on component interfaces are observable, and assume that causal dependencies between component interface events within components are not known. For such systems, we describe a causality analysis framework that helps us establish the causal relationship between component failures and system failures, given an observed system execution trace. The analysis is based on a formalization of counterfactual reasoning, and applicable to real-time systems. We illustrate the analysis with a case study from the medical device domain
Performance Evaluation of Components Using a Granularity-based Interface Between Real-Time Calculus and Timed Automata
To analyze complex and heterogeneous real-time embedded systems, recent works
have proposed interface techniques between real-time calculus (RTC) and timed
automata (TA), in order to take advantage of the strengths of each technique
for analyzing various components. But the time to analyze a state-based
component modeled by TA may be prohibitively high, due to the state space
explosion problem. In this paper, we propose a framework of granularity-based
interfacing to speed up the analysis of a TA modeled component. First, we
abstract fine models to work with event streams at coarse granularity. We
perform analysis of the component at multiple coarse granularities and then
based on RTC theory, we derive lower and upper bounds on arrival patterns of
the fine output streams using the causality closure algorithm. Our framework
can help to achieve tradeoffs between precision and analysis time.Comment: QAPL 201
Counterfactual Causality from First Principles?
In this position paper we discuss three main shortcomings of existing
approaches to counterfactual causality from the computer science perspective,
and sketch lines of work to try and overcome these issues: (1) causality
definitions should be driven by a set of precisely specified requirements
rather than specific examples; (2) causality frameworks should support system
dynamics; (3) causality analysis should have a well-understood behavior in
presence of abstraction.Comment: In Proceedings CREST 2017, arXiv:1710.0277
Causality in real-time dynamic substructure testing
Causality, in the bond graph sense, is shown to provide a conceptual framework for the design of real-time dynamic substructure testing experiments. In particular, known stability problems with split-inertia substructured systems are reinterpreted as causality issues within the new conceptual framework.
As an example, causality analysis is used to provide a practical solution to a split-inertia substructuring problem and the solution is experimentally verified
Disentangling causal webs in the brain using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A review of current approaches
In the past two decades, functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging has been used
to relate neuronal network activity to cognitive processing and behaviour.
Recently this approach has been augmented by algorithms that allow us to infer
causal links between component populations of neuronal networks. Multiple
inference procedures have been proposed to approach this research question but
so far, each method has limitations when it comes to establishing whole-brain
connectivity patterns. In this work, we discuss eight ways to infer causality
in fMRI research: Bayesian Nets, Dynamical Causal Modelling, Granger Causality,
Likelihood Ratios, LiNGAM, Patel's Tau, Structural Equation Modelling, and
Transfer Entropy. We finish with formulating some recommendations for the
future directions in this area
- …