An Effective Fixpoint Semantics for Linear Logic Programs

In this paper we investigate the theoretical foundation of a new bottom-up semantics for linear logic programs, and more precisely for the fragment of LinLog that consists of the language LO enriched with the constant 1. We use constraints to symbolically and finitely represent possibly infinite collections of provable goals. We define a fixpoint semantics based on a new operator in the style of Tp working over constraints. An application of the fixpoint operator can be computed algorithmically. As sufficient conditions for termination, we show that the fixpoint computation is guaranteed to converge for propositional LO. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to define an effective fixpoint semantics for linear logic programs. As an application of our framework, we also present a formal investigation of the relations between LO and Disjunctive Logic Programming. Using an approach based on abstract interpretation, we show that DLP fixpoint semantics can be viewed as an abstraction of our semantics for LO. We prove that the resulting abstraction is correct and complete for an interesting class of LO programs encoding Petri Nets.Comment: 39 pages, 5 figures. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programmin

Automatic compile-time parallelization of logic programs for restricted, goal-level, independent and-parallelism.

A framework for the automatic parallelization of (constraint) logic programs is proposed and proved correct. Intuitively, the parallelization process replaces conjunctions of literals with parallel expressions. Such expressions trigger at run-time the exploitation of restricted, goal-level, independent and-parallelism. The parallelization process performs two steps. The first one builds a conditional dependency graph (which can be implified using compile-time analysis information), while the second transforms the resulting graph into linear conditional expressions, the parallel expressions of the &-Prolog language. Several heuristic algorithms for the latter ("annotation") process are proposed and proved correct. Algorithms are also given which determine if there is any loss of parallelism in the linearization process with respect to a proposed notion of maximal parallelism. Finally, a system is presented which implements the proposed approach. The performance of the different annotation algorithms is compared experimentally in this system by studying the time spent in parallelization and the effectiveness of the results in terms of speedups

A comparison of languages which operationalise and formalise {KADS} models of expertise

In the field of Knowledge Engineering, dissatisfaction with the rapid-prototyping approach has led to a number of more principled methodologies for the construction of knowledge-based systems. Instead of immediately implementing the gathered and interpreted knowledge in a given implementation formalism according to the rapid-prototyping approach, many such methodologies centre around the notion of a conceptual model: an abstract, implementation independent description of the relevant problem solving expertise. A conceptual model should describe the task which is solved by the system and the knowledge which is required by it. Although such conceptual models have often been formulated in an informal way, recent years have seen the advent of formal and operational languages to describe such conceptual models more precisely, and operationally as a means for model evaluation. In this paper, we study a number of such formal and operational languages for specifying conceptual models. In order to enable a meaningful comparison of such languages, we focus on languages which are all aimed at the same underlying conceptual model, namely that from the KADS method for building KBS. We describe eight formal languages for KADS models of expertise, and compare these languages with respect to their modelling primitives, their semantics, their implementations and their applications. Future research issues in the area of formal and operational specification languages for KBS are identified as the result of studying these languages. The paper also contains an extensive bibliography of research in this area

Poly-controlled partial evaluation and its application to resource-aware program specialization

La Evaluación Parcial es una técnica automática para la optimización de programas. Su objetivo principal es el de especializar un programa con respecto a parte de sus datos de entrada, los que se conocen como datos estáticos. La calidad del código generado por la evaluación parcial de programas lógicos depende, en gran medida, de la estrategia de control que se haya empleado. Desafortunadamente, aún estamos lejos de contar con una estrategia de control suficientemente sofisticada como para comportarse de manera óptima para cualquier programa. La principal contribución de esta tesis es el desarrollo de la Evaluación Parcial Policontrolada, un novedoso entorno para la evaluación parcial de programas lógicos, el cual es policontrolado en el sentido de que puede tomar en cuenta conjuntos de reglas de control global y local, en lugar de emplear una única combinación predeterminada (como es el caso de la evaluación parcial tradicional). Este entorno es más flexible que los enfoques existentes, ya que permite asignar diferentes reglas de control local y global a diferentes patrones de llamada. De este modo, es posible obtener programas especializados que no pueden ser generados usando evaluación parcial tradicional. En consecuencia, el entorno de evaluación parcial policontrolada puede generar conjuntos de programas especializados, en lugar de un único programa. A través de técnicas auto-ajustables, es posible hacer que este enfoque sea completamente automático. Dichas técnicas permiten medir la calidad de los diferentes programas especializados obtenidos. Este entorno es consciente de los recursos, en el sentido de que cada una de las soluciones obtenidas a través de la evaluación parcial policontrolada es valorada utilizando funciones de adecuación, las que pueden tener en cuenta factores tales como el tamaño de los programas especializados, o la cantidad de memoria que consumen, además de la velocidad del programa especializado que es el factor habitualmente considerado en otros entornos de evaluación parcial. Este entorno de evaluación parcial policontrolada ha sido implementado en el sistema CiaoPP, y evaluado con numerosos programas de prueba. Los resultados experimentales muestran que nuestra propuesta obtiene en muchos casos mejores especializaciones que aquellas generadas usando la evaluación parcial tradicional, especialmente cuando la especialización es consciente de los recursos. Otra de las principales contribuciones de esta tesis es la presentación de una visión unificada del problema de eliminar la polivarianza superflua en la evaluación parcial y en la especialización abstracta múltiple, a través del uso de un paso de minimización, el cual agrupa versiones equivalentes de predicados. Este paso se puede aplicar en la especialización de cualquier programa Prolog, inclusive aquellos que contienen llamadas a predicados predefinidos o predicados externos. Además, ofrecemos la posibilidad de agrupar versiones que no sean estrictamente equivalentes, con el propósito de obtener programas más pequeños