Tunable Balun Low-Noise Amplifier in 65nm CMOS Technology

The presented paper includes the design and implementation of a 65 nm CMOS low-noise amplifier (LNA) based on inductive source degeneration. The amplifier is realized with an active balun enabling a single-ended input which is an important requirement for low-cost system on chip implementations. The LNA has a tunable bandpass characteristics from 4.7 GHz up to 5.6 GHz and a continuously tunable gain from 22 dB down to 0 dB, which enables the required flexibility for multi-standard, multi-band receiver architectures. The gain and band tuning is realized with an optimized tunable active resistor in parallel to a tunable L-C tank amplifier load. The amplifier achieves an IIP3 linearity of -8dBm and a noise figure of 2.7 dB at the highest gain and frequency setting with a low power consumption of 10 mW. The high flexibility of the proposed LNA structure together with the overall good performance makes it well suited for future multi-standard low-cost receiver front-ends

A 1.2 V and 69 mW 60 GHz Multi-channel Tunable CMOS Receiver Design

A multi-channel receiver operating between 56 GHz and 70 GHz for coverage of different 60 GHz bands worldwide is implemented with a 90 nm Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) process. The receiver containing an LNA, a frequency down-conversion mixer and a variable gain amplifier incorporating a band-pass filter is designed and implemented. This integrated receiver is tested at four channels of centre frequencies 58.3 GHz, 60.5 GHz, 62.6 GHz and 64.8 GHz, employing a frequency plan of an 8 GHz-intermediate frequency (IF). The achieved conversion gain by coarse gain control is between 4.8 dB–54.9 dB. The millimeter-wave receiver circuit is biased with a 1.2V supply voltage. The measured power consumption is 69 mW

A 300-800MHz Tunable Filter and Linearized LNA applied in a Low-Noise Harmonic-Rejection RF-Sampling Receiver

A multiband flexible RF-sampling receiver aimed at software-defined radio is presented. The wideband RF sampling function is enabled by a recently proposed discrete-time mixing downconverter. This work exploits a voltage-sensing LNA preceded by a tunable LC pre-filter with one external coil to demonstrate an RF-sampling receiver with low noise figure (NF) and high harmonic rejection (HR). The second-order LC filter provides voltage pre-gain and attenuates the source noise aliasing, and it also improves the HR ratio of the sampling downconverter. The LNA consists of a simple amplifier topology built from inverters and resistors to improve the third-order nonlinearity via an enhanced voltage mirror technique. The RF-sampling receiver employs 8 times oversampling covering 300 to 800 MHz in two RF sub-bands. The chip is realized in 65 nm CMOS and the measured gain across the band is between 22 and 28 dB, while achieving a NF between 0.8 to 4.3 dB. The IIP2 varies between +38 and +49 dBm and the IIP3 between -14 dBm and -9 dBm, and the third and fifth order HR ratios are more than 60 dB. The LNA and downconverter consumes 6 mW, and the clock generator takes 12 mW at 800 MHz RF.\ud \u

A 0.1–5.0 GHz flexible SDR receiver with digitally assisted calibration in 65 nm CMOS

© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.A 0.1–5.0 GHz flexible software-defined radio (SDR) receiver with digitally assisted calibration is presented, employing a zero-IF/low-IF reconfigurable architecture for both wideband and narrowband applications. The receiver composes of a main-path based on a current-mode mixer for low noise, a high linearity sub-path based on a voltage-mode passive mixer for out-of-band rejection, and a harmonic rejection (HR) path with vector gain calibration. A dual feedback LNA with “8” shape nested inductor structure, a cascode inverter-based TCA with miller feedback compensation, and a class-AB full differential Op-Amp with Miller feed-forward compensation and QFG technique are proposed. Digitally assisted calibration methods for HR, IIP2 and image rejection (IR) are presented to maintain high performance over PVT variations. The presented receiver is implemented in 65 nm CMOS with 5.4 mm2 core area, consuming 9.6–47.4 mA current under 1.2 V supply. The receiver main path is measured with +5 dB m/+5dBm IB-IIP3/OB-IIP3 and +61dBm IIP2. The sub-path achieves +10 dB m/+18dBm IB-IIP3/OB-IIP3 and +62dBm IIP2, as well as 10 dB RF filtering rejection at 10 MHz offset. The HR-path reaches +13 dB m/+14dBm IB-IIP3/OB-IIP3 and 62/66 dB 3rd/5th-order harmonic rejection with 30–40 dB improvement by the calibration. The measured sensitivity satisfies the requirements of DVB-H, LTE, 802.11 g, and ZigBee.Peer reviewedFinal Accepted Versio

Quadrature LC VCO with passive coupling and phase combining network

A circuit and method for generating a signal is disclosed. The circuit includes a set of wide tuning LC tanks, a set of core transistors cross coupled to the set of wide tuning LC tanks, and a combining network coupled to the set of wide tuning LC tanks and the set of core transistors. The combining network further includes a set of inputs connected to the set of wide tuning LC tanks and the set of core transistors, a set of coupling transistors connected to the set of inputs, a set of source inductors connected to the set of coupling transistors, a coupling capacitor connected to the set of source inductors, a load resistor connected to the coupling capacitor. The combining network combines the set of inputs and the signal is delivered to the load resistor as a fourth order harmonic.Board of Regents, University of Texas Syste

Low-Power Wake-Up Receivers

The Internet of Things (IoT) is leading the world to the Internet of Everything (IoE), where things, people, intelligent machines, data and processes will be connected together. The key to enter the era of the IoE lies in enormous sensor nodes being deployed in the massively expanding wireless sensor networks (WSNs). By the year of 2025, more than 42 billion IoT devices will be connected to the Internet. While the future IoE will bring priceless advantages for the life of mankind, one challenge limiting the nowadays IoT from further development is the ongoing power demand with the dramatically growing number of the wireless sensor nodes. To address the power consumption issue, this dissertation is motivated to investigate low-power wake-up receivers (WuRXs) which will significantly enhance the sustainability of the WSNs and the environmental awareness of the IoT. Two proof-of-concept low-power WuRXs with focuses on two different application scenarios have been proposed. The first WuRX, implemented in a cost-effective 180-nm CMOS semiconductor technology, operates at 401−406-MHz band. It is a good candidate for application scenarios, where both a high sensitivity and an ultra-low power consumption are in demand. Concrete use cases are, for instance, medical implantable applications or long-range communications in rural areas. This WuRX does not rely on a further assisting semiconductor technology, such as MEMS which is widely used in state-of-the-art WuRXs operating at similar frequencies. Thus, this WuRX is a promising solution to low-power low-cost IoT. The second WuRX, implemented in a 45-nm RFSOI CMOS technology, was researched for short-range communication applications, where high-density conventional IoT devices should be installed. By investigation of the WuRX for operation at higher frequency band from 5.5 GHz to 7.5 GHz, the nowadays ever more over-traffic issues that arise at low frequency bands such as 2.4 GHz can be substantially addressed. A systematic, analytical research route has been carried out in realization of the proposed WuRXs. The thesis begins with a thorough study of state-of-the-art WuRX architectures. By examining pros and cons of these architectures, two novel architectures are proposed for the WuRXs in accordance with their specific use cases. Thereon, key WuRX parameters are systematically analyzed and optimized; the performance of relevant circuits is modeled and simulated extensively. The knowledge gained through these investigations builds up a solid theoretical basis for the ongoing WuRX designs. Thereafter, the two WuRXs have been analytically researched, developed and optimized to achieve their highest performance. Proof-of-concept circuits for both the WuRXs have been fabricated and comprehensively characterized under laboratory conditions. Finally, measurement results have verified the feasibility of the design concept and the feasibility of both the WuRXs

Design and Analysis of Low-power Millimeter-Wave SiGe BiCMOS Circuits with Application to Network Measurement Systems

Interest in millimeter (mm-) wave frequencies covering the spectrum of 30-300 GHz has been steadily increasing. Advantages such as larger absolute bandwidth and smaller form-factor have made this frequency region attractive for numerous applications, including high-speed wireless communication, sensing, material science, health, automotive radar, and space exploration. Continuous development of silicon-germanium heterojunction bipolar transistor (SiGe HBT) and associated BiCMOS technology has achieved transistors with fT/fmax of 505/720 GHz and integration with 55 nm CMOS. Such accomplishment and predictions of beyond THz performance have made SiGe BiCMOS technology the most competitive candidate for addressing the aforementioned applications. Especially for mobile applications, a critical demand for future mm-wave applications will be low DC power consumption (Pdc), which requires a substantial reduction of supply voltage and current. Conventionally, reducing the supply voltage will lead to HBTs operating close to or in the saturation region, which is typically avoided in mm-wave circuits due to expectated performance degradation and often inaccurate models. However, due to only moderate speed reduction at the forward-biased base-collector voltage (VBC) up to 0.5 V and the accuracy of the compact model HICUM/L2 also in saturation, low-power mm-wave circuits with SiGe HBTs operating in saturation offer intriguing benefits, which have been explored in this thesis based on 130 nm SiGe BiCMOS technologies: • Different low-power mm-wave circuit blocks are discussed in detail, including low-noise amplifiers (LNAs), down-conversion mixers, and various frequency multipliers covering a wide frequency range from V-band (50-75 GHz) to G-band (140-220 GHz). • Aiming at realizing a better trade-off between Pdc and RF performance, a drastic decrease in supply voltage is realized with forward-biased VBC, forcing transistors of the circuits to operate in saturation. • Discussions contain the theoretical analysis of the key figure of merits (FoMs), topology and bias selection, device sizing, and performance enhancement techniques. • A 173-207 GHz low-power amplifier with 23 dB gain and 3.2 mW Pdc, and a 72-108 GHz low-power tunable amplifier with 10-23 dB gain and 4-21 mW Pdc were designed. • A 97 GHz low-power down-conversion mixer was presented with 9.6 dB conversion gain (CG) and 12 mW Pdc. • For multipliers, a 56-66 GHz low-power frequency quadrupler with -3.6 dB peak CG and 12 mW Pdc, and a 172-201 GHz low-power frequency tripler with -4 dB peak CG and 10.5 mW Pdc were realized. By cascading these two circuits, also a 176-193 GHz low-power ×12 multiplier was designed, achieving -11 dBm output power with only 26 mW Pdc. • An integrated 190 GHz low-power receiver was designed as one receiving channel of a G-band frequency extender specifically for a VNA-based measurement system. Another goal of this receiver is to explore the lowest possible Pdc while keeping its highly competitive RF performance for general applications requiring a wide LO tuning range. Apart from the low-power design method of circuit blocks, the careful analysis and distribution of the receiver FoMs are also applied for further reduction of the overall Pdc. Along this line, this receiver achieved a peak CG of 49 dB with a 14 dB tunning range, consuming only 29 mW static Pdc for the core part and 171 mW overall Pdc, including the LO chain. • All designs presented in this thesis were fabricated and characterized on-wafer. Thanks to the accurate compact model HICUM/L2, first-pass access was achieved for all circuits, and simulation results show excellent agreement with measurements. • Compared with recently published work, most of the designs in this thesis show extremely low Pdc with highly competitive key FoMs regarding gain, bandwidth, and noise figure. • The observed excellent measurement-simulation agreement enables the sensitivity analysis of each design for obtaining a deeper insight into the impact of transistor-related physical effects on critical circuit performance parameters. Such studies provide meaningful feedback for process improvement and modeling development.:Table of Contents Kurzfassung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 List of symbols and acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Technology 7 2.1 Fabrication Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.1 SiGe HBT performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.2 B11HFC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.1.3 SG13G2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1.4 SG13D7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.2 Commonly Used Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.1 Grounded-sidewall-shielded microstrip line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.2 Zero-impedance Transmission Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2.3 Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.3.1 Active Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.2.3.2 Passive Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3 Low-power Low-noise Amplifiers 25 3.1 173-207 GHz Ultra-low-power Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1.1 Topology Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1.2 Bias Dependency of the Small-signal Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.1.2.1 Bias . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.1.2.2 Bias vs Gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.1.2.3 Bias vs Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.1.2.4 Bias vs Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.1.3 Bias selection and Device sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3.1 Bias Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3.2 Device Sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.1.4 Performance Enhancement Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.1.4.1 Gm-boosting Inductors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.1.4.2 Stability Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.1.4.3 Noise Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.1.5 Circuit Realization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.1.5.1 Layout Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.1.5.2 Inductors Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.1.5.3 Dual-band Matching Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 3.1.5.4 Circuit Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.1.6 Results and Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.1 Measurement Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.2 Measurement Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.3 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.2 72-108 GHz Low-Power Tunable Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.2.1 Configuration, Sizing, and Bias Tuning Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.2.2 Regional Matching Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.2.2.1 Impedance Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.2.2.2 Regional Matching Network Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.2.3 Circuit Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4 Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4.1 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 4 Low-power Down-conversion Mixers 73 4.1 97 GHz Low-power Down-conversion Mixer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1 Mixer Design and Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1.1 Mixer Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1.2 Bias Selection and Device Sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4.1.1.3 Mixer Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4.1.2 Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.1.2.1 Measurement Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.1.2.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 4.2 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5 Low-power Multipliers 87 5.1 General Design Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2 56-66 GHz Low-power Frequency Quadrupler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.3 172-201 GHz Low-power Frequency Tripler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4 176-193 GHz Low-power ×12 Frequency Multiplier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 6 Low-power Receivers 101 6.1 Receiver Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 6.2 LO Chain (×12) Integrated 190 GHz Low-Power Receiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 6.2.1 Receiver Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.2.2 Low-power Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.2.3 Building Blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.2.3.1 LNA and LO DA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.2.3.2 Tunable Mixer and IF BA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.2.3.3 65 GHz (V-band) Quadrupler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 6.2.3.4 G-band Tripler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 6.2.4 Receiver Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 6.2.5 Measurement Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.2.6 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 7 Conclusions 133 7.1 Summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 7.2 Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 Bibliography 135 List of Figures 149 List of Tables 157 A Derivation of the Gm 159 A.1 Gm of standard cascode stage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 A.2 Gm of cascode stage with Lcas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 A.3 Gm of cascode stage with Lb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 B Derivation of Yin in the stability analysis 163 C Derivation of Zin and Zout 165 C.1 Zin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 C.2 Zout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 D Derivation of the cascaded oP1dB 169 E Table of element values for the designed circuits 17

A Fully-Integrated Reconfigurable Dual-Band Transceiver for Short Range Wireless Communications in 180 nm CMOS

© 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works.A fully-integrated reconfigurable dual-band (760-960 MHz and 2.4-2.5 GHz) transceiver (TRX) for short range wireless communications is presented. The TRX consists of two individually-optimized RF front-ends for each band and one shared power-scalable analog baseband. The sub-GHz receiver has achieved the maximum 75 dBc 3rd-order harmonic rejection ratio (HRR3) by inserting a Q-enhanced notch filtering RF amplifier (RFA). In 2.4 GHz band, a single-ended-to-differential RFA with gain/phase imbalance compensation is proposed in the receiver. A ΣΔ fractional-N PLL frequency synthesizer with two switchable Class-C VCOs is employed to provide the LOs. Moreover, the integrated multi-mode PAs achieve the output P1dB (OP1dB) of 16.3 dBm and 14.1 dBm with both 25% PAE for sub-GHz and 2.4 GHz bands, respectively. A power-control loop is proposed to detect the input signal PAPR in real-time and flexibly reconfigure the PA's operation modes to enhance the back-off efficiency. With this proposed technique, the PAE of the sub-GHz PA is improved by x3.24 and x1.41 at 9 dB and 3 dB back-off powers, respectively, and the PAE of the 2.4 GHz PA is improved by x2.17 at 6 dB back-off power. The presented transceiver has achieved comparable or even better performance in terms of noise figure, HRR, OP1dB and power efficiency compared with the state-of-the-art.Peer reviewe

High performance photonic microwave filters based on a 50GHz optical soliton crystal Kerr micro-comb

We demonstrate a photonic radio frequency (RF) transversal filter based on an integrated optical micro-comb source featuring a record low free spectral range of 49 GHz yielding 80 micro-comb lines across the C-band. This record-high number of taps, or wavelengths for the transversal filter results in significantly increased performance including a QRF factor more than four times higher than previous results. Further, by employing both positive and negative taps, an improved out-of-band rejection of up to 48.9 dB is demonstrated using Gaussian apodization, together with a tunable centre frequency covering the RF spectra range, with a widely tunable 3-dB bandwidth and versatile dynamically adjustable filter shapes. Our experimental results match well with theory, showing that our transversal filter is a competitive solution to implement advanced adaptive RF filters with broad operational bandwidths, high frequency selectivity, high reconfigurability, and potentially reduced cost and footprint. This approach is promising for applications in modern radar and communications systems.Comment: 19 pages, 12 figures, 107 reference